|
|
Post by silverdollar on Oct 27, 2017 18:28:48 GMT
I have looked at this because Mr Hughes and Mr Coates I do not want to be seen to be making a snap judgement. Also Mr Hughes your remit was to move this club forward from what was a reasonably secure position.
Played 47. Won 13 drawn 13 Lost 21 added to this are poor performances in the cup competitions. If that is not all you can add the very poor success rate with money spent in the transfer market. Thank goodness for the very poor sides that have taken up relegation places. We have only won 27% of our games
Has Mark Hughes fulfilled his role
|
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Oct 27, 2017 18:32:09 GMT
A LOT of premier league managers get sacked on 50% win rate.
Think this answers your question
|
|
|
|
Post by geoff321 on Oct 27, 2017 18:34:59 GMT
I have looked at this because Mr Hughes and Mr Coates I do not want to be seen to be making a snap judgement. Also Mr Hughes your remit was to move this club forward from what was a reasonably secure position. Played 47. Won 13 drawn 13 Lost 21 added to this are poor performances in the cup competitions. If that is not all you can add the very poor success rate with money spent in the transfer market. Thank goodness for the very poor sides that have taken up relegation places. We have only won 27% of our games Has Mark Hughes fulfilled his role He has moved the club forward! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2017 18:37:17 GMT
I have looked at this because Mr Hughes and Mr Coates I do not want to be seen to be making a snap judgement. Also Mr Hughes your remit was to move this club forward from what was a reasonably secure position. Played 47. Won 13 drawn 13 Lost 21 added to this are poor performances in the cup competitions. If that is not all you can add the very poor success rate with money spent in the transfer market. Thank goodness for the very poor sides that have taken up relegation places. We have only won 27% of our games Has Mark Hughes fulfilled his role He has moved the club forward! Has.....not is mate I fear he's lost his mojo 😕 |
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Oct 27, 2017 19:05:39 GMT
I have looked at this because Mr Hughes and Mr Coates I do not want to be seen to be making a snap judgement. Also Mr Hughes your remit was to move this club forward from what was a reasonably secure position. Played 47. Won 13 drawn 13 Lost 21 added to this are poor performances in the cup competitions. If that is not all you can add the very poor success rate with money spent in the transfer market. Thank goodness for the very poor sides that have taken up relegation places. We have only won 27% of our games Has Mark Hughes fulfilled his role He has moved the club forward! He definitely moved the club forward ( past tense ) but it is doubtful that the momentum continues, I'd say. I guess, ultimately, we'll have to wait on the assessment of the owners regarding this....... I know where I currently stand, though |
|
|
|
Post by harrysburrow on Oct 27, 2017 19:26:19 GMT
Hang on - these stats can't be right? Sparky says we've only had 2 bad games?
|
|
|
|
Post by stuammo on Oct 27, 2017 21:11:44 GMT
A LOT of premier league managers get sacked on 50% win rate. Think this answers your question I’m not defending LMH here at all but that fact is wrong. Not many clubs at all even win 50% of games never mind get sacked for doing so! |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Oct 27, 2017 21:21:53 GMT
The decline started the second he took over.
Yes, he bought some fancy furniture for the lounge and dining room when he first arrived, but he ignored the foundations, the structural integrity of the walls and the leaky roof.
Now the whole thing is collapsing around his ears.
|
|
|
|
Post by GreaterGlasgowstokie on Oct 27, 2017 21:43:16 GMT
The decline started the second he took over. Yes, he bought some fancy furniture for the lounge and dining room when he first arrived, but he ignored the foundations, the structural integrity of the walls and the leaky roof. Now the whole thing is collapsing around his ears. Not as bad as that fella who came round and did the foundations, walls and roof, but then kept promising he had a plan to do the decorating, put in a nice floor with underfloor heating, instal that luxury bathroom suite and the marble kitchen, but always downed tools at 1 in the afternoon and fucked off home early |
|
|
|
Post by PB1863 on Oct 27, 2017 21:56:00 GMT
Points gained in 55% of his games.
He seems to have runs of losses followed by runs of wins. I hope he can start one of those winning runs now otherwise I fear the Palace game will be his last.
|
|
|
|
Post by uknorse on Oct 28, 2017 6:16:29 GMT
dont come on here providing facts ....the hughes lovers will accuse you of fabricating them ;-).... ...his record from january 2017 alone would have seen him fired at any other club in the league, hes a very lucky man , the owners have stood by him throughout it all, but i think the defeat today, will set him up with a win or bust game nxt week at the bet365
|
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Oct 28, 2017 8:17:24 GMT
A LOT of premier league managers get sacked on 50% win rate. Think this answers your question I've had a quick look and found the following for the last few to go: Koeman was 41% at Everton Shakespeare 42% at Leicester De Boer 20% at Everton Puel 37.7% at Southampton Even Karanka at Borough was below 50% even with time in the championship, Ranieri at 42% plus others from last season all below 50%. Pelligrini was at 59% with Citeh, Van Gaal at 52.5% & Jose at 58% (Rodgers was 49.4% so doesn't qualify) - so for 15/16 that's 3 out of 11 sacked managers (not included Unsworth or Koeman in the 11). About 28%. |
|
|
|
Post by mozzer on Oct 28, 2017 8:59:03 GMT
I've seen plenty of the wins and draws and just a few losses. My seasons have been going well except for the last two matches. How flat last week game was really was annoying. We the supporters want the Entertainment value. The results are the necessity for our club. Win equals a good game ? Where we finish in the table is of importance to the club. Totally agree but... Let's finish 10th or 11th with some pride instead of these grey boring shit shattered performances with regular embarrising score line defeats |
|
|
|
Post by ohbottom on Oct 28, 2017 9:11:32 GMT
approximately 1.1064pts per game. Strong and stable....
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2017 11:21:24 GMT
approximately 1.1064pts per game. Strong and stable.... Boring and dreadful |
|
|
|
Post by Edward Tattsyrup on Oct 28, 2017 11:44:05 GMT
There are a lot of stats being trotted out to make one point or another, the long and short of it for me is, both me and my son were dreading the Bournemouth game in a similar way to those last 6 months of TP, in fact, my son would happily have stayed at home.
It not about the lack of defensive ability.
It's not the fact that we obviously don't work on any free kicks.
It's not the fact that we are toothless in the final third.
Or even the fact pointless subs are made on 60 mins.
It's not the fact that he can't motivate a team to start on the refs whistle.
It's not the fact that he has no plan b, if indeed there is a plan a.
It all of it and the fact match days have again become tedious and dull.
I'm not sure what the answer is, only that something has to change.
|
|
