|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2019 16:14:04 GMT
The most recent one - obviously the one before that was already wrapped up as, correctly, the relevant people were convicted. So, did the plod give a cursory glance because there was nothing to see? Well we will never know will we But I would like to think the local labour activists are reformed people Who no longer believe in rigging ballots Actually we do know. They investigated, and there was nothing by way of evidence to bring about charges. Unless you have evidence to the contrary of course in which case send it to the IPCC so they can look into it.........
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Oct 15, 2019 16:23:35 GMT
Well we will never know will we But I would like to think the local labour activists are reformed people Who no longer believe in rigging ballots Actually we do know. They investigated, and there was nothing by way of evidence to bring about charges. Unless you have evidence to the contrary of course in which case send it to the IPCC so they can look into it......... That investigation was after the 400 postal votes were rejected for counterfeit signatures and/or wrong date of births matching records Get rid of the evidence then investigate
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Oct 15, 2019 17:29:02 GMT
Employees have a right to union representation. So in the spirit of demarcation of duties, when they represent the employee they are working for the union, even though they are also an employee of the employer. Surely you don’t to do away with that...
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Oct 15, 2019 18:54:55 GMT
Employees have a right to union representation. So in the spirit of demarcation of duties, when they represent the employee they are working for the union, even though they are also an employee of the employer. Surely you don’t to do away with that... Thats a quick about turn from something you don't recognise as happening only a post before I am fine with unions and employees having representation perhaps the union should pay for this or employ people themselves rather than expecting the taxpayer to pick up the bill for their staff.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Oct 15, 2019 20:39:25 GMT
Employees have a right to union representation. So in the spirit of demarcation of duties, when they represent the employee they are working for the union, even though they are also an employee of the employer. Surely you don’t to do away with that... Thats a quick about turn from something you don't recognise as happening only a post before I am fine with unions and employees having representation perhaps the union should pay for this or employ people themselves rather than expecting the taxpayer to pick up the bill for their staff. No, You were on about paid leave being given to union reps. I was saying that as a union rep, the take time out of their normal duties as an employee of the company, to represent another employee as their union representative. It’s hardly paid leave. It’s just helping an employee to get a fair hearing.
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Oct 16, 2019 8:13:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Oct 16, 2019 8:32:09 GMT
If Brexit is delayed, it will be interesting to see the reaction of politician like this one and the voters generally. Labour will hoping to see a Tory collapse in the polls - but that ain’t certain by a long way.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Oct 16, 2019 10:27:55 GMT
Thats a quick about turn from something you don't recognise as happening only a post before I am fine with unions and employees having representation perhaps the union should pay for this or employ people themselves rather than expecting the taxpayer to pick up the bill for their staff. No, You were on about paid leave being given to union reps. I was saying that as a union rep, the take time out of their normal duties as an employee of the company, to represent another employee as their union representative. It’s hardly paid leave. It’s just helping an employee to get a fair hearing. Again that is not what I am talking about in local and national government there are employees paid for by the taxpayer who spend all their time on union work why should the taxpayer fund this ?
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 16, 2019 11:46:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Oct 16, 2019 13:06:12 GMT
No, You were on about paid leave being given to union reps. I was saying that as a union rep, the take time out of their normal duties as an employee of the company, to represent another employee as their union representative. It’s hardly paid leave. It’s just helping an employee to get a fair hearing. Again that is not what I am talking about in local and national government there are employees paid for by the taxpayer who spend all their time on union work why should the taxpayer fund this ? No, No, No. If you’re talking about a union leader, they will be paid for by the union out of members subscriptions. If you’re talking about a representative, then their hours to actually facilitate a union member in a dispute are virtually 0%. You are living in an antiquated notion of union rules...
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Oct 16, 2019 17:46:11 GMT
But only one rose to the top she was no rose more a stapelia gigantean link We'll have no sexisum on here from the likes of you
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Oct 16, 2019 17:49:44 GMT
Whatever happened to the Labour Party? Does it exist anymore?
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Oct 16, 2019 20:37:05 GMT
No, You were on about paid leave being given to union reps. I was saying that as a union rep, the take time out of their normal duties as an employee of the company, to represent another employee as their union representative. It’s hardly paid leave. It’s just helping an employee to get a fair hearing. Again that is not what I am talking about in local and national government there are employees paid for by the taxpayer who spend all their time on union work why should the taxpayer fund this ? no there not they are paid for by the union members out of the subscriptions no money comes from public funds
|
|
|
Post by Eggybread on Oct 17, 2019 8:36:17 GMT
The hypocrisy of the 'Corbyn is a terrorist supporter' right wing memes beggars belief. This bunch - the literal mirror image of the people Corbyn is alleged to have supported as a powerless backbencher - are in GOVERNMENT with the Tories and currently being BEGGED with another huge bribe to support Johnson's Brexit deal. Imagine the media outrage if Labour had been the biggest party at the last election and Corbyn had offered Sinn Fein £1billion to take up their seats and keep a Labour Government in power and another huge bung to support Labour's Brexit plans. This is the price we pay for having four unelected press billionaires stuffing their evil bias and bigotry down people's throats!
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Oct 17, 2019 9:46:12 GMT
Again that is not what I am talking about in local and national government there are employees paid for by the taxpayer who spend all their time on union work why should the taxpayer fund this ? no there not they are paid for by the union members out of the subscriptions no money comes from public funds Mate I even posted a link from the government website saying union reps get paid leave for undertaking union business, sometimes its a good idea to know what you are talking about
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Oct 19, 2019 18:15:52 GMT
How many votes has this shambles of a government now lost ?? not sure if Johnson has won one yet!
I hope he likes prison food if he doesn't sign that letter by 11!!
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Oct 20, 2019 11:49:11 GMT
How many votes has this shambles of a government now lost ?? not sure if Johnson has won one yet! I hope he likes prison food if he doesn't sign that letter by 11!! “Pick up that soap Joris”
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Oct 21, 2019 9:39:56 GMT
How many votes has this shambles of a government now lost ?? not sure if Johnson has won one yet! I hope he likes prison food if he doesn't sign that letter by 11!! They will lose them all with this shower of remain MP's, anybody who thinks these are normal political times is clearly in cloud cuckoo land, this is all down to Theresa May and her needless GE and the Eu backed remain MP's who all have their snouts in the trough's. Shows how useless this lot are when there was just a dozen MP's in the house debating democracy !
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Oct 23, 2019 7:41:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2019 7:45:58 GMT
Great article from that Corbyn loving Commie Peter Osborne about the absolute state of our media at the moment with regards to this pitiful Johnson government....
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2019 19:13:39 GMT
But but but.....benefit cheats.
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 24, 2019 20:09:35 GMT
But but but.....benefit cheats. Well let’s get rid of them then. Give jezza a chance What’s stopping him?
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Oct 25, 2019 7:41:32 GMT
But but but.....benefit cheats. let's tackle both then
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2019 7:46:07 GMT
But but but.....benefit cheats. let's tackle both then Of course. In order of priority, meaning this takes priority for the next 20 years.....
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Oct 25, 2019 8:25:59 GMT
Of course. In order of priority, meaning this takes priority for the next 20 years..... 1 day, capital punishment for Corporate tax avoidance finance directors and accountants who push it and benefit cheats milking the system You've got to be thick to be claiming invalidity benefits and then complete the London marathon as a normal runner and post it on Facebook
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Oct 26, 2019 9:07:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Oct 26, 2019 9:41:43 GMT
All while being in the EU. Which rights are they protecting?
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Oct 26, 2019 10:12:44 GMT
All while being in the EU. Which rights are they protecting? A vision of the future horrors of a post Brexit Tory Government, trick. The only reason you take rights out of guaranteed legislation is if you want to reduce them not increase them. Johnson's deal is a blueprint for deregulation and should be opposed at every single turn.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Oct 26, 2019 10:40:53 GMT
All while being in the EU. Which rights are they protecting? A vision of the future horrors of a post Brexit Tory Government, trick. The only reason you take rights out of guaranteed legislation is if you want to reduce them not increase them. Johnson's deal is a blueprint for deregulation and should be opposed at every single turn. Momo this has nothing to do with Boris Johnson. Tricky's right. Asda operate under workers rights set by the EU don't they? The very rights that Labour are bleating about. It's all bollocks. I've posted before that EU workers rights are among the lowest in the world. They have to be to accommodate developing countries in new trade deals.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Oct 26, 2019 10:42:15 GMT
All while being in the EU. Which rights are they protecting? A vision of the future horrors of a post Brexit Tory Government, trick. The only reason you take rights out of guaranteed legislation is if you want to reduce them not increase them. Johnson's deal is a blueprint for deregulation and should be opposed at every single turn. "opposed at every single turn" except at a general election eh comrade?
|
|