|
|
Stoke top
Aug 23, 2017 14:54:06 GMT
via mobile
Post by wingy11 on Aug 23, 2017 14:54:06 GMT
Had a new stoke top worn it twice and its pulling already, last time im buying one under this make absolutely cheap and nasty.
|
|
|
|
Stoke top
Aug 23, 2017 14:57:52 GMT
via mobile
Post by StokieNath on Aug 23, 2017 14:57:52 GMT
Macron has alaways been cheap shit.
Tacky and wank.
Even the 3rd strip is fucking crap.
|
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Aug 23, 2017 15:00:59 GMT
Under consumer law you can take it back as a good has to be of "merchantable quality" and "fit for purpose" If after only two washes there is damage it is neither
|
|
|
|
Stoke top
Aug 23, 2017 15:06:14 GMT
via mobile
Post by wingy11 on Aug 23, 2017 15:06:14 GMT
Under consumer law you can take it back as a good has to be of "merchantable quality" and "fit for purpose" If after only two washes there is damage it is neither Cus its the home one and it looks daft white on the back i signed a disclaimer and had a number on it would that make a difference? |
|
|
|
Post by rosco on Aug 23, 2017 15:57:55 GMT
First year I've not purchased a shirt. The macron quality was awful last year obviously hasnt improved
|
|
|
|
Stoke top
Aug 23, 2017 16:05:06 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2017 16:05:06 GMT
Bought a load for the kids and some of the training kit for myself and there's a marked improvement this season in my opinion.......
|
|
|
|
Stoke top
Aug 23, 2017 16:07:51 GMT
via mobile
Post by mattador78 on Aug 23, 2017 16:07:51 GMT
Had no issues with mine last season but the NB ones were shite
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2017 16:12:24 GMT
"Stoke top"
Thought I was living in a parallel world for a minute where we had played another game and we were top of the league.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokiekris on Aug 23, 2017 16:22:18 GMT
Had last seasons light blue away top
1st one had to be replaced as the press studs fell off
2nd replaced as had a fault in the material
3rd replace as bobbled like fuck
4th sitting in the draw with no macron badges on shoulders and it now says. et 3 5 across the front
|
|
|
|
Post by akstoke93 on Aug 23, 2017 16:29:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Aug 23, 2017 16:36:42 GMT
Under consumer law you can take it back as a good has to be of "merchantable quality" and "fit for purpose" If after only two washes there is damage it is neither If washing the top ruins it, the Vale tops should last for ever.  |
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Aug 23, 2017 17:21:07 GMT
Under consumer law you can take it back as a good has to be of "merchantable quality" and "fit for purpose" If after only two washes there is damage it is neither Cus its the home one and it looks daft white on the back i signed a disclaimer and had a number on it would that make a difference? Not if its the quality of the shirt that has made the shirt defective also the disclaimer can be viewed in law as an unfair contract term and you cant wave away your rights under English law on merchantable quality and fitness for purpose. link |
|
|
|
Stoke top
Aug 23, 2017 17:29:08 GMT
via mobile
Post by johnbutlershair on Aug 23, 2017 17:29:08 GMT
Had last seasons light blue away top 1st one had to be replaced as the press studs fell off 2nd replaced as had a fault in the material 3rd replace as bobbled like fuck 4th sitting in the draw with no macron badges on shoulders and it now says. et 3 5 across the front Yeah bought my away top in March as it was cheap. We're now sponsored by et 3 5. Terrible quality. Bring back the Asics purple kit |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2017 17:31:56 GMT
The last few years I've ended up peeling that sticky transfer stuff off the shirts, which sometimes includes the badge, because it comes loose in the wash anyway. I only ever use the eco setting on my washer which is relatively low heat.
I haven't bought the shirt for a few years, I've taken advantage of a poker site promotion that offers a free premier league shirt if you sign up and deposit + meet qualifying conditions at a site they're affiliated with.
There's no fucking way I'd by a shirt again unless all aspects of the signage are stitched to the shirt. I understand economics and whatnot, but these aren't £15. They cost upwards of 40 notes so for that sort of money you should be getting something that lasts a while, especially considering the majority of customers are from Stoke not bloody Kensington.
|
|
|
|
Stoke top
Aug 23, 2017 20:17:16 GMT
via mobile
Post by choppercherry on Aug 23, 2017 20:17:16 GMT
Must be the way you lot wash them! 😂 All my Macron Stoke shirts are fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boothen on Aug 23, 2017 20:20:20 GMT
This is why I don't pay silly money for replica shirts these days, I'd much rather may the £15 odd for a polo shirt. That in itself throws up a few problems though, because the sizing of clothes from the SCFC shop is fucking retarded.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Aug 23, 2017 20:35:54 GMT
I liked the Adidas kits, I know they didn't do any bespoke shirts for us but the quality was in a different league to the festering tat we have had since.
|
|
|
|
Post by walrus on Aug 23, 2017 20:53:45 GMT
Just bought one. Why not for 13 quid? I'll report back on quality when it arrives in 10-15 days. |
|
|
|
Post by walrus on Aug 23, 2017 20:54:26 GMT
I always thought the Le Coq Sportif ones were great quality.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokemark on Aug 23, 2017 21:05:53 GMT
Just bought one. Why not for 13 quid? I'll report back on quality when it arrives in 10-15 days. Probably because A) It may never turn up B) £13 for a piece of shit that looks wank is still £13 C) Probabky made using child labour D) Not a penny goes to our club and likely goes to Chinese mafia Other than that it's perfect |
|
|
|
Post by Gifton on Aug 23, 2017 21:07:16 GMT
Remember back in the 90's? There was one particular ASICS one that pulled if you just looked at it.
|
|
|
|
Post by chigstoke on Aug 23, 2017 21:53:23 GMT
Just bought one. Why not for 13 quid? I'll report back on quality when it arrives in 10-15 days. Probably because A) It may never turn up B) £13 for a piece of shit that looks wank is still £13 C) Probabky made using child labour D) Not a penny goes to our club and likely goes to Chinese mafia Other than that it's perfect I've ordered from that site before The sellers are pretty good and stuff does turn up The reps use the exact same materials as well I can't comment on the child labour part but if it is children making them, they do a bloody good job |
|
|
|
Post by walrus on Aug 23, 2017 22:11:49 GMT
Just bought one. Why not for 13 quid? I'll report back on quality when it arrives in 10-15 days. Probably because A) It may never turn up B) £13 for a piece of shit that looks wank is still £13 C) Probabky made using child labour D) Not a penny goes to our club and likely goes to Chinese mafia Other than that it's perfect A - I used a credit card so can reverse a transaction that doesn't arrive. B - That's a risk I'm willing to take. iOffer is a reputable site and the reviews of that seller are extremely positive. C - That admittedly makes me uncomfortable, but there's so much messed up stuff in the world that you can't avoid it all all the time. When was the last time you consumed a Nestle product? I don't think there's any more likelihood this was made using child labour than, say, a hat I could buy on the beach on holiday, and I wouldn't think twice about doing that. D - I pay hundreds for my season ticket every year so won't feel guilty about not spending an extra £50 on a shirt that is reportedly poorly made. Also, see point C. |
|
|
|
Stoke top
Aug 23, 2017 22:36:26 GMT
via mobile
Post by samba :) on Aug 23, 2017 22:36:26 GMT
Probably because A) It may never turn up B) £13 for a piece of shit that looks wank is still £13 C) Probabky made using child labour D) Not a penny goes to our club and likely goes to Chinese mafia Other than that it's perfect A - I used a credit card so can reverse a transaction that doesn't arrive. B - That's a risk I'm willing to take. iOffer is a reputable site and the reviews of that seller are extremely positive. C - That admittedly makes me uncomfortable, but there's so much messed up stuff in the world that you can't avoid it all all the time. When was the last time you consumed a Nestle product? I don't think there's any more likelihood this was made using child labour than, say, a hat I could buy on the beach on holiday, and I wouldn't think twice about doing that. D - I pay hundreds for my season ticket every year so won't feel guilty about not spending an extra £50 on a shirt that is reportedly poorly made. Also, see point C. keep me updated i might follow suit |
|
|
|
Stoke top
Aug 23, 2017 22:45:14 GMT
via mobile
Post by Gifton on Aug 23, 2017 22:45:14 GMT
Probably because A) It may never turn up B) £13 for a piece of shit that looks wank is still £13 C) Probabky made using child labour D) Not a penny goes to our club and likely goes to Chinese mafia Other than that it's perfect A - I used a credit card so can reverse a transaction that doesn't arrive. B - That's a risk I'm willing to take. iOffer is a reputable site and the reviews of that seller are extremely positive. C - That admittedly makes me uncomfortable, but there's so much messed up stuff in the world that you can't avoid it all all the time. When was the last time you consumed a Nestle product? I don't think there's any more likelihood this was made using child labour than, say, a hat I could buy on the beach on holiday, and I wouldn't think twice about doing that. D - I pay hundreds for my season ticket every year so won't feel guilty about not spending an extra £50 on a shirt that is reportedly poorly made. Also, see point C. Looks fairly accurate to the original but the bet365 text just doesn't look quite right. Makes you wonder how they can get the macron logo/Stoke badge pretty much spot on but can't get the correct text for the bet365 logo. |
|
|
|
Post by walrus on Aug 23, 2017 22:54:21 GMT
A - I used a credit card so can reverse a transaction that doesn't arrive. B - That's a risk I'm willing to take. iOffer is a reputable site and the reviews of that seller are extremely positive. C - That admittedly makes me uncomfortable, but there's so much messed up stuff in the world that you can't avoid it all all the time. When was the last time you consumed a Nestle product? I don't think there's any more likelihood this was made using child labour than, say, a hat I could buy on the beach on holiday, and I wouldn't think twice about doing that. D - I pay hundreds for my season ticket every year so won't feel guilty about not spending an extra £50 on a shirt that is reportedly poorly made. Also, see point C. keep me updated i might follow suit Will do. My only concern is the size. I'm average height and of slender build, but a lot of the reviews were saying they came back smaller than expected, so I went for XL. Hopefully that will be right. |
|
|
|
Post by akstoke93 on Aug 24, 2017 8:19:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2017 8:41:16 GMT
Just bought one. Why not for 13 quid? I'll report back on quality when it arrives in 10-15 days. Probably because A) It may never turn up B) £13 for a piece of shit that looks wank is still £13 C) Probabky made using child labour D) Not a penny goes to our club and likely goes to Chinese mafia Other than that it's perfect The fact that he accepts PAYPAL makes your comments nonsense. You have 180 days to raise a dispute with PAYPAL , as they do not release the money until that time has passed. And that can be for any reason, goods not arrived, not as per description, poor quality... |
|
|
|
Stoke top
Aug 24, 2017 8:47:15 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2017 8:47:15 GMT
You only have to look at them to see they're no more than cheap tat sold at extortionate prices I'll be buying the white long sleeved one next home game |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2017 8:47:37 GMT
I had a shirt that pulled.
Well, so it seemed, every Fri Night at Queens in Basford, never failed in that shirt.
|
|
