|
|
Post by Vestan Pance on Dec 4, 2007 12:21:30 GMT
Show yourselves!!!!!
Is the rivals board now censoring this one? The only reason people are on here is because the other one is wank, and the alternative is the Oswald Moseley appreciation society on one hand, and GuernseyDave's cornocopia of wank on the other.
Terrible business this.
|
|
|
|
Post by ilforddave on Dec 4, 2007 12:25:30 GMT
I'm "the lurker" I have made myself the invisible user
|
|
|
|
Post by CillaBlacksPissFlaps on Dec 4, 2007 12:33:43 GMT
I'm still lurking but I miss the general banter and chit chat of the old board, this is a very sad day indeed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Dec 4, 2007 12:36:34 GMT
I made it. That NEW????? board is wank.   Oh yeh. I had to stick a 1 on the end of my name though.  |
|
|
|
Post by Vestan Pance on Dec 4, 2007 12:41:06 GMT
Afternoon Staffs.
I hope i'm wrong, but i can see our little "community" fucking disappearing, which would be especially regretful for guys like Joe, who use the board to keep in touch.
You simply cannot put BETA software like that on trial on a board as busy as ours. It's idiocy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Widget123 on Dec 4, 2007 16:46:06 GMT
^beta???...IMO chance would be a fine thing - that abortion of an "update" has got to be alpha and 0.0.3 at that...stupid fools.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Dec 4, 2007 16:50:02 GMT
... So, is that smaller?
*Whoosh, straight over my head*
|
|
|
|
Post by Widget123 on Dec 4, 2007 17:00:40 GMT
most software/websites are developed in house until the release version. early versions are named by the phonetic alphabet usually...alpha then beta then the release v1.0.
v 0.1 alpha - v 1.0 alpha tends to be early development
v 0.1 beta - v 1.0 beta is generally testing, rewriting code to remove bugs etc...
v 1.0 is usually the first live release this is usually well tested, but generally has a few bugs which are picked up in the wild by users and fixed with 1.x fixes until a time when the developer feels total stablility has been reached.
v 2.0+ tends to be new feature releases etc...
|
|
|
|
Post by StoKeith on Dec 4, 2007 17:06:27 GMT
I was lurking but now I'm obviously not!
I kind of want to see if my avatar works too!
I bet it doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by 58Potter on Dec 4, 2007 17:26:35 GMT
You were right re: the avatar keith, more fine tuning methinks  |
|
|
|
Post by realstokebloke on Dec 4, 2007 17:34:57 GMT
Jumping in to test the water.
Old board = dead.
New board = wank.
This board = have to do in the meantime.
On the upside Dixie, it seems others can correct (your) bad spelling in the thread titles
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by DrGonzo on Dec 4, 2007 17:55:12 GMT
I think UNPC's claim of being the shittest Stoke web site on the net is severly under threat
|
|
