|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2019 18:23:53 GMT
Why should any of the happenings over the last couple of years come as any surprise? I know that they have, but as things unfold now - it all should have been perfectly obvious. Remain are very keen to inform me that I didn't understand the question in the first place. I must have become frightened about the level of immigration. Or some "European Army" that might be formed. I have probably changed my mind now having been struck by a lightening bolt from some pro EU God. The fact is that the EU is anti democratic. Having held a referendum, why should we be surprised that Remainers (anti democratic followers) will not honour the result? Why should they? They are themselves anti democratic. Should we hold another referendum, and Remain win - loe and behold they will all be preaching the value of democracy and the fight that took place to retain it over two world wars. At this moment, we are not a democratic nation. Might I suggest that we stop behaving like one? Make of that what you will.
If you think that immigration was not a topic during the Referendum, either you were asleep then, or you are in denial now. Oh it was a topic alright. It wasn't an issue of importance for every person that voted Leave however. We are all being tarred with the same brush.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Oct 22, 2019 18:26:02 GMT
Finally. It doesn't mean mutch though if 16 MP'S vote differently on the programme motion. Which I think they will Thinking about it, 15 would provide a tie. That'd be interesting!
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 22, 2019 18:26:53 GMT
Thinking about it, 15 would provide a tie. That'd be interesting! Bercow deciding vote
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Oct 22, 2019 18:28:39 GMT
Thinking about it, 15 would provide a tie. That'd be interesting! Bercow deciding vote Indeed but he wouldn't do it.😁
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 22, 2019 18:31:36 GMT
Bercow deciding vote Indeed but he wouldn't do it.😁 Oh he would. With a big fucking smile
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 22, 2019 18:32:45 GMT
Shameless cunts.
|
|
|
Post by RedandWhite90 on Oct 22, 2019 19:05:10 GMT
Not to sure how anyone can disagree with that second vote tonight.
Leaver or remainer, now is not the time to be rushing through something so important.
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Oct 22, 2019 19:27:57 GMT
No compromise Boris use every trick in the book and then some, take us out. My stance has changed I was open to doing a deal but I've seen and read all the objections none of which have any legitimacy. I'm sick of it and I'll be honest I don't care about anyone anymore I'm fine come what may. I just hope all the remainers can manage too... nah I don't really I'll laugh my bollocks off. If you've got any... which I doubt. You are the remainer type who I hope gets shafted and ends up homeless that's assuming you have a job or home.
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 22, 2019 19:35:19 GMT
When it’s in their interests they will then through bills to hell with time
Proven time and again.
The “we need scrutiny” Is bollocks. They have had enough time to scrutinise May deal which is near enough the same.
The reason for the scrutiny is to add amendments that delay brexit and ask for stuff the EU won’t negotiate again to delay brexit
It’s a withdrawal agreement they have months in transition to agree future relationship and bring in any needed laws to cover the gaps.
Shameless cunts.
It will eventually back fire on them
|
|
|
Post by henry on Oct 22, 2019 19:49:46 GMT
Have any MP's come out and said how much time they need ? Do they need 7 days, 4 weeks, 6 months ? what ?
|
|
|
Post by RedandWhite90 on Oct 22, 2019 19:50:50 GMT
If you've got any... which I doubt. You are the remainer type who I hope gets shafted and ends up homeless that's assuming you have a job or home. I think both of you need to go and give your heads a wobble. Just look at how were now behaving. Over Politics! Sad, sad times.
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Oct 22, 2019 19:54:29 GMT
When it’s in their interests they will then through bills to hell with time Proven time and again. The “we need scrutiny” Is bollocks. They have had enough time to scrutinise May deal which is near enough the same. The reason for the scrutiny is to add amendments that delay brexit and ask for stuff the EU won’t negotiate again to delay brexit It’s a withdrawal agreement they have months in transition to agree future relationship and bring in any needed laws to cover the gaps. Shameless cunts. It will eventually back fire on them They shoukd split it between a set of research teams, 10 pages each team who will highlight the main points in a day. Cull the fookin lot of them.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Oct 22, 2019 20:32:58 GMT
The EU provig for a third tine that they will do anything to avoid no deal. It was always our best negotiating lever. 31st January it is. What excuse could Jezzbollah use this time to avoid a general election? For a third time.
|
|
|
Post by henry on Oct 22, 2019 21:03:12 GMT
A delay into next year, what a fucking piss take.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Oct 22, 2019 21:13:31 GMT
When it’s in their interests they will then through bills to hell with time Proven time and again. The “we need scrutiny” Is bollocks. They have had enough time to scrutinise May deal which is near enough the same. The reason for the scrutiny is to add amendments that delay brexit and ask for stuff the EU won’t negotiate again to delay brexit It’s a withdrawal agreement they have months in transition to agree future relationship and bring in any needed laws to cover the gaps. Shameless cunts. It will eventually back fire on them To be fair, Stephen Barclay the BREXIT MINISTER, made a complete fool of himself at that parlimentary committee meeting yesterday because he clearly didn't understand the deal he'd negotiated. If the Brexit minister himself is struggling with fundamental aspects of the deal, it's hardly surprising if MP's who were only allowed to see the bill for the first time last night, want to have sufficient time to digest it. Johnson could request a technical extension of just two or three weeks and have an extremely good chance of getting the blooming thing passed, indeed we're closer now than we've ever been but he just can't bring himself to do it. October 31st has gone now anyway, so why cut off your nose to spite your face?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2019 21:15:28 GMT
Irrespective of how anyone voted, can somebody hit that F'ing bloke with a shovel, who keeps shouting stop Brexit on the news! F'ing pillock!
|
|
|
Post by henry on Oct 22, 2019 21:17:39 GMT
Irrespective of how anyone voted, can somebody hit that F'ing bloke with a shovel, who keeps shouting stop Brexit on the news! F'ing pillock! He's going to be there for another 3 months at least
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Oct 22, 2019 21:53:18 GMT
Irrespective of how anyone voted, can somebody hit that F'ing bloke with a shovel, who keeps shouting stop Brexit on the news! F'ing pillock! He's paid to be there by remoaners.
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Oct 22, 2019 21:53:44 GMT
Nice to see The Sun's Political Editor is up to speed on the Benn Act.
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Oct 22, 2019 22:03:22 GMT
Nice to see The Sun's Political Editor is up to speed on the Benn Act. Which in section 3 gives a flexible approach to the exit date by the HoC if they vote to change it. Just so you can get up to speed: Section 3 obliges the Prime Minister to accept an extension to 31 January 2020, and allows the Prime Minister to either accept an offer or ask the House of Commons to accept an offer of any other date.
|
|
|
Post by RedandWhite90 on Oct 22, 2019 22:28:44 GMT
3 month "flextension" which leads to an immediate GE seems logical moving forward.
If I was still a strong Leave voter I would be happy with this decision as the amount of delusion around Boris Johnson is huge. He will fly in with his "deal" ready to go.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2019 22:52:52 GMT
Irrespective of how anyone voted, can somebody hit that F'ing bloke with a shovel, who keeps shouting stop Brexit on the news! F'ing pillock! He's paid to be there by remoaners. Who are these " remoaners" who are paying him? I have had similar thoughts but cannot see where the money is coming from.
|
|
|
Post by franklin66 on Oct 22, 2019 22:57:10 GMT
He's paid to be there by remoaners. Who are these " remoaners" who are paying him? I have had similar thoughts but cannot see where the money is coming from. He's being paid £85 a day to protest.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2019 23:15:14 GMT
Who are these " remoaners" who are paying him? I have had similar thoughts but cannot see where the money is coming from. He's being paid £85 a day to protest. Where did you hear this and who is paying him?
|
|
|
Post by Absolution on Oct 22, 2019 23:36:28 GMT
He's being paid £85 a day to protest. Where did you hear this and who is paying him?The BBC.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Oct 23, 2019 6:08:36 GMT
Irrespective of how anyone voted, can somebody hit that F'ing bloke with a shovel, who keeps shouting stop Brexit on the news! F'ing pillock! He's paid to be there by remoaners. The Brexitier protesters are being pay rolled...
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Oct 23, 2019 7:15:49 GMT
Nice to see The Sun's Political Editor is up to speed on the Benn Act. Which in section 3 gives a flexible approach to the exit date by the HoC if they vote to change it. Just so you can get up to speed: Section 3 obliges the Prime Minister to accept an extension to 31 January 2020, and allows the Prime Minister to either accept an offer or ask the House of Commons to accept an offer of any other date. He can't turn down anything the EU offers.
|
|
|
Post by maxplonk on Oct 23, 2019 7:26:34 GMT
The people who complained about Cameron spending taxpayers' money on the Government leaflet during the 2016 campaign are the same people spending taxpayers' money on "get ready for Brexit on 31 October" ads.
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on Oct 23, 2019 7:28:16 GMT
Which in section 3 gives a flexible approach to the exit date by the HoC if they vote to change it. Just so you can get up to speed: Section 3 obliges the Prime Minister to accept an extension to 31 January 2020, and allows the Prime Minister to either accept an offer or ask the House of Commons to accept an offer of any other date. He can't turn down anything the EU offers. Ain’t much of substance likely now before the extension is in place other than a whole lot of hot air from all sides. Once that extension happens there has to be an election pronto because this current Parliament will just waste the extension time bickering and end up needing a further extension.
|
|
|
Post by foster on Oct 23, 2019 7:32:37 GMT
If you've got any... which I doubt. You are the remainer type who I hope gets shafted and ends up homeless that's assuming you have a job or home. Classy.
|
|