|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Mar 1, 2017 15:25:19 GMT
Which ones do you think we should treat the best? Seems like the answer is criminals. |
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Mar 1, 2017 19:29:43 GMT
The more I hear about prisons the more I think it should be about rehabilitation to break the cycle. Sounds like someone has got it right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2017 21:20:44 GMT
Criminals.....never caused me any bother
Pensioners on the other hand...
|
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Mar 1, 2017 21:29:18 GMT
Which ones do you think we should treat the best? Seems like the answer is criminals. After reading the link, that's just bang wrong. UK laws are far too soft Bollocks to rehabilitation..... shoot the fuckers If people KNEW that if they commit a crime, then the forfeit was their life, crime would tumble. |
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Mar 2, 2017 6:55:03 GMT
Which ones do you think we should treat the best? Seems like the answer is criminals. Why do you separate the two. Although there are still pensioners that need lots of help & even a few that were conscripted/worked in reserved occupation. There are also those on final salary pensions & more money than they can spend. There are plenty pensioners who've lived a life of crime & continue to do so. No doubt you know a few... |
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Mar 2, 2017 7:14:46 GMT
Which ones do you think we should treat the best? Seems like the answer is criminals. After reading the link, that's just bang wrong. UK laws are far too soft Bollocks to rehabilitation..... shoot the fuckers If people KNEW that if they commit a crime, then the forfeit was their life, crime would tumble. a bit harsh to kill somebody for doing 32mph in a 30 zone i agree prisons are too soft and easy for some kill them, kill them all |
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Mar 2, 2017 7:19:52 GMT
After reading the link, that's just bang wrong. UK laws are far too soft Bollocks to rehabilitation..... shoot the fuckers If people KNEW that if they commit a crime, then the forfeit was their life, crime would tumble. a bit harsh to kill somebody for doing 32mph in a 30 zone i agree prisons are too soft and easy for some kill them, kill them all Don't see the problem northwhich. If you knew that if you go over the 30 limit, you've had it, would you do it? Genuinely-would you? I know I wouldn't!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Mar 2, 2017 8:37:17 GMT
a bit harsh to kill somebody for doing 32mph in a 30 zone i agree prisons are too soft and easy for some kill them, kill them all Don't see the problem northwhich. If you knew that if you go over the 30 limit, you've had it, would you do it? Genuinely-would you? I know I wouldn't!!! sometimes its hard to. Few weeks ago i had worked from home for 2 days, didnt go out and when i next went out i spotted a small 20mph sign on a lampost, theyd turned the whole of our village to 20 mph, id been doing nearly 30 for a few hundred yards |
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Mar 2, 2017 8:52:42 GMT
Don't see the problem northwhich. If you knew that if you go over the 30 limit, you've had it, would you do it? Genuinely-would you? I know I wouldn't!!! sometimes its hard to. Few weeks ago i had worked from home for 2 days, didnt go out and when i next went out i spotted a small 20mph sign on a lampost, theyd turned the whole of our village to 20 mph, id been doing nearly 30 for a few hundred yards It's the gallows for you northwhich 😂😂 |
|
|
|
Post by Rick Grimes on Mar 2, 2017 9:09:57 GMT
I think we lock up too many people for things that they don't really need to be put in prison for. Unless they're a genuine danger to society i.e. murderers, rapists etc then do we really need to lock them up or can we look at more rehabilitative methods?
For those that think we are already 'too soft' I'd challenge you to go and look at one of the most punitive countries in the world, the US, and look at the numbers they put in prison and the numbers that continually re-offend which are incredibly high. Then take a look at countries that take a rehabilitative approach like Norway and Sweden and you'll find that the number of criminals that re-offend is very low.
|
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Mar 2, 2017 17:11:54 GMT
sometimes its hard to. Few weeks ago i had worked from home for 2 days, didnt go out and when i next went out i spotted a small 20mph sign on a lampost, theyd turned the whole of our village to 20 mph, id been doing nearly 30 for a few hundred yards It's the gallows for you northwhich 😂😂 Too quick, let him continue to serve time with Mrs Northy  |
|
|
|
Post by robstokie on Mar 2, 2017 17:41:56 GMT
Hopefully, when we get our own powers back, we can look to redress the balance. As long as we delay triggering Article 50, until then (and for the apparent 2 years of negotiation), we will still have to put up with the meddlesome do-gooder middle-class eurocrats cracking their beauracratic whip.
|
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Mar 2, 2017 18:22:54 GMT
Pensioners are looked after fine - especially this generation of pensioners or are still living off the idea that old people fought in WW2 (when in actual fact there are very few of that heroic generation left).
The question should be youngsters or criminals?
|
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Mar 2, 2017 19:22:41 GMT
It's the gallows for you northwhich 😂😂 Too quick, let him continue to serve time with Mrs Northy who ? |
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Mar 2, 2017 19:53:19 GMT
Too quick, let him continue to serve time with Mrs Northy who ? Oh you've escaped darn sarf have you? |
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Mar 2, 2017 20:08:20 GMT
Oh you've escaped darn sarf have you? yep, spicy food at my leisure  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2017 11:41:14 GMT
I think we lock up too many people for things that they don't really need to be put in prison for. Unless they're a genuine danger to society i.e. murderers, rapists etc then do we really need to lock them up or can we look at more rehabilitative methods?
For those that think we are already 'too soft' I'd challenge you to go and look at one of the most punitive countries in the world, the US, and look at the numbers they put in prison and the numbers that continually re-offend which are incredibly high. Then take a look at countries that take a rehabilitative approach like Norway and Sweden and you'll find that the number of criminals that re-offend is very low.
But if you shot them I'll guarantee not many will re-offend^
|
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Mar 3, 2017 11:58:05 GMT
I think we lock up too many people for things that they don't really need to be put in prison for. Unless they're a genuine danger to society i.e. murderers, rapists etc then do we really need to lock them up or can we look at more rehabilitative methods?
For those that think we are already 'too soft' I'd challenge you to go and look at one of the most punitive countries in the world, the US, and look at the numbers they put in prison and the numbers that continually re-offend which are incredibly high. Then take a look at countries that take a rehabilitative approach like Norway and Sweden and you'll find that the number of criminals that re-offend is very low.
But if you shot them I'll guarantee not many will re-offend^
 |
|
