|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 16:16:21 GMT
"The family".
"The Chinese".
So glad he's been moved on. Turd.
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Feb 13, 2017 16:59:35 GMT
Having discussions about this issue on the Oatcake is one thing, but why Stoke have decided to escalate this relatively unimportant story is beyond me, it's simply making all parties look unprofessional. There's a difference. Stoke may be dealing with the PR clumsily but Pulis has shown himself up as the spiteful, vindictive bastard we know he is. What he objects to is the growing number of people who can see it. As for it being unimportant, if any other manager had leaked confidential details of a player before a game then left a phone message taunting the opposition club captain, you wouldn't be saying that. You're just one of the people who think Pulis is bigger than Stoke City.
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Feb 13, 2017 17:07:16 GMT
"The family". "The Chinese". So glad he's been moved on. Turd. "the Icelandics"
|
|
|
Post by claytonscrubs on Feb 13, 2017 17:07:23 GMT
6 weeks later....Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
|
|
|
Post by richardparker on Feb 13, 2017 17:26:17 GMT
Now ask him why he's bosom buddies with the twat who almost single handedly ruined his skipper's career at the very top while he's talking about how much respect he has for Ryan. As I've said previously, I don't give a fuck about a bastard voicemail but I do care about how Ryan was vilified by Wenger and the press after the tackle on Ramsay, which most knowledgeable pundits said was accidental and six of one and half a dozen of the other. Let him squirm on the end of that question. No doubt he'll come up with some platitudes like 'Let Bygones be bygones', but it's too late for Ryan to see it that way. The lad will never again get a second chance to make up for what Wenger and the press did to him. For that alone I despise Pulis as being lower than a snake's belly. OS. Pulis is one slimey excuse for a human being. He is full of nasty excrement. See below: Loves our area and our people. (Keep your friends close and your enemies closer). 'I'm still raising £1000s of pounds for the Donna Louise Trust'. (How wonderful I am, doing a lot of great work for charity). He turned up for the 2nd half of the match just after his mum had died. (That's how he chose to deal with it! Doesn't mean he loves us, just himself). And there's no doubt plenty more... I'll thank him for helping to get us into the premier league, as I will all the players involved in that promotion season; along with how they established us as a top flight over the next 3 seasons. Apart form that, Pulis is history. He is the proverbial stone in the shoe of each and every one of us. It's time to let him know loud and clear that we don't like him anymore! (If we ever did).
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Feb 13, 2017 17:41:20 GMT
Having discussions about this issue on the Oatcake is one thing, but why Stoke have decided to escalate this relatively unimportant story is beyond me, it's simply making all parties look unprofessional. There's a difference. Stoke may be dealing with the PR clumsily but Pulis has shown himself up as the spiteful, vindictive bastard we know he is. What he objects to is the growing number of people who can see it. As for it being unimportant, if any other manager had leaked confidential details of a player before a game then left a phone message taunting the opposition club captain, you wouldn't be saying that. You're just one of the people who think Pulis is bigger than Stoke City. Do we know that then? I've only been following this casually but is that a known fact? Only that I would be amazed if anyone at WBA in a senior official capacity such as the manager or the chairman leaked the story since the drugs offence took place under their watch and so reflects poorly on their club and not us. Conversely I could well imagine a fan of WBA or a former friend of Saido with some inside gen leaking it and I had thought that was a far more likely scenario. I'll happily stand corrected though if we really know that and we have the source.
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Feb 13, 2017 17:45:00 GMT
There's a difference. Stoke may be dealing with the PR clumsily but Pulis has shown himself up as the spiteful, vindictive bastard we know he is. What he objects to is the growing number of people who can see it. As for it being unimportant, if any other manager had leaked confidential details of a player before a game then left a phone message taunting the opposition club captain, you wouldn't be saying that. You're just one of the people who think Pulis is bigger than Stoke City. Do we know that then? I've only been following this casually but is that a known fact? Only that I would be amazed if anyone at WBA in a senior official capacity such as the manager or the chairman leaked the story since the drugs offence took place under their watch and so reflects poorly on their club and not us. Conversely I could well imagine a fan of WBA or a former friend of Saido with some inside gen leaking it and I had thought that was a far more likely scenario. I'll happily stand corrected though if we really know that and we have the source. We can note that Pulis didn't like Stoke leaking the story about his phone message at all. Never said anything about the Saido leak though. Funny, that. The people in the club seem confident they know where the leak came from. That'll do for me.
|
|
|
Post by geoff321 on Feb 13, 2017 18:11:25 GMT
Having discussions about this issue on the Oatcake is one thing, but why Stoke have decided to escalate this relatively unimportant story is beyond me, it's simply making all parties look unprofessional. There's a difference. Stoke may be dealing with the PR clumsily but Pulis has shown himself up as the spiteful, vindictive bastard we know he is. What he objects to is the growing number of people who can see it. As for it being unimportant, if any other manager had leaked confidential details of a player before a game then left a phone message taunting the opposition club captain, you wouldn't be saying that. You're just one of the people who think Pulis is bigger than Stoke City. I'm simply saying that because the story that was leaked to the press about SB was true and not false it was unwise of Stoke to engage in a war of words in public with West Brom, what did they hope to achieve? Regarding the message to Ryan, Pulis has said he used the word loser but not in the context Mark Hughes is alleging, it's in Ryan's power to now clarify this issue beyond any reasonable doubt by responding. Regarding the character of Tony Pulis, I don't know him, have never met him and have only his television interviews and his managerial record to judge him by, in that respect I'm not prepared to go along with the majority on here that he is some sort of villain.
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Feb 13, 2017 18:17:09 GMT
There's a difference. Stoke may be dealing with the PR clumsily but Pulis has shown himself up as the spiteful, vindictive bastard we know he is. What he objects to is the growing number of people who can see it. As for it being unimportant, if any other manager had leaked confidential details of a player before a game then left a phone message taunting the opposition club captain, you wouldn't be saying that. You're just one of the people who think Pulis is bigger than Stoke City. I'm simply saying that because the story that was leaked to the press about SB was true and not false it was unwise of Stoke to engage in a war of words in public with West Brom, what did they hope to achieve? Regarding the message to Ryan, Pulis has said he used the word loser but not in the context Mark Hughes is alleging, it's in Ryan's power to now clarify this issue beyond any reasonable doubt by responding. Regarding the character of Tony Pulis, I don't know him, have never met him and have only his television interviews and his managerial record to judge him by, in that respect I'm not prepared to go along with the majority on here that he is some sort of villain. 1. The question is what did West Brom hope to achieve? 2. Pulis is a liar. Proven fact. I think we can take the response of Kath Shawcross as testament to the context. 3. Don't forget the courts. They think he's some kind of villain too. As for you, If I were admin, you'd be the one person I'd ban permanently from the site. You're on here arguing all the time that Pulis is bigger than the club, and you're not even a Stoke fan.
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Feb 13, 2017 18:23:30 GMT
Do we know that then? I've only been following this casually but is that a known fact? Only that I would be amazed if anyone at WBA in a senior official capacity such as the manager or the chairman leaked the story since the drugs offence took place under their watch and so reflects poorly on their club and not us. Conversely I could well imagine a fan of WBA or a former friend of Saido with some inside gen leaking it and I had thought that was a far more likely scenario. I'll happily stand corrected though if we really know that and we have the source. We can note that Pulis didn't like Stoke leaking the story about his phone message at all. Never said anything about the Saido leak though. Funny, that. The people in the club seem confident they know where the leak came from. That'll do for me. Where the leak came from not who the leak came from. I think it is highly likely/certain it came from someone with some inside knowledge on the WBA side but I would be staggered if it came from the manager of the club, it was their player taking drugs on their watch. I simply don't believe it came from the manager or indeed anyone in a senior position at WBA, the story is embarrassing and rule breaking, for them not us. I repeat far more likely it came from a supporter or one time friend of Berahino with some inside info.
|
|
|
Post by colinroberts1 on Feb 13, 2017 18:24:55 GMT
If Hughes has done it without the nod from ryan,pulis will get his bestestest mate to sign for west brom in the summer don't ya think ??
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Feb 13, 2017 18:28:20 GMT
If Hughes has done it without the nod from ryan,pulis will get his bestestest mate to sign for west brom in the summer don't ya think ?? Walters has nothing to do with this.
|
|
|
Post by colinroberts1 on Feb 13, 2017 18:31:28 GMT
If Hughes has done it without the nod from ryan,pulis will get his bestestest mate to sign for west brom in the summer don't ya think ?? Walters has nothing to do with this. Haha sorry should of put shawcross ya pedantic bitch 😉
|
|
|
Post by dieguito88 on Feb 13, 2017 18:46:06 GMT
There's a difference. Stoke may be dealing with the PR clumsily but Pulis has shown himself up as the spiteful, vindictive bastard we know he is. What he objects to is the growing number of people who can see it. As for it being unimportant, if any other manager had leaked confidential details of a player before a game then left a phone message taunting the opposition club captain, you wouldn't be saying that. You're just one of the people who think Pulis is bigger than Stoke City. I'm simply saying that because the story that was leaked to the press about SB was true and not false it was unwise of Stoke to engage in a war of words in public with West Brom, what did they hope to achieve? Regarding the message to Ryan, Pulis has said he used the word loser but not in the context Mark Hughes is alleging, it's in Ryan's power to now clarify this issue beyond any reasonable doubt by responding. Regarding the character of Tony Pulis, I don't know him, have never met him and have only his television interviews and his managerial record to judge him by, in that respect I'm not prepared to go along with the majority on here that he is some sort of villain. The fact that he is not answear this in pubblic, maybe says more that what u think. Silence speaks louder than stupid words.
|
|
|
Post by terrorofturfmoor on Feb 13, 2017 18:47:58 GMT
If Hughes has done it without the nod from ryan,pulis will get his bestestest mate to sign for west brom in the summer don't ya think ?? It's "BESTERIST" not bestestest...... Jeez, how many more times!!! The intelligence of some on here, sheesh!!!
|
|
|
Post by butlerstbob on Feb 13, 2017 18:56:28 GMT
There's a difference. Stoke may be dealing with the PR clumsily but Pulis has shown himself up as the spiteful, vindictive bastard we know he is. What he objects to is the growing number of people who can see it. As for it being unimportant, if any other manager had leaked confidential details of a player before a game then left a phone message taunting the opposition club captain, you wouldn't be saying that. You're just one of the people who think Pulis is bigger than Stoke City. I'm simply saying that because the story that was leaked to the press about SB was true and not false it was unwise of Stoke to engage in a war of words in public with West Brom, what did they hope to achieve? Regarding the message to Ryan, Pulis has said he used the word loser but not in the context Mark Hughes is alleging, it's in Ryan's power to now clarify this issue beyond any reasonable doubt by responding. Regarding the character of Tony Pulis, I don't know him, have never met him and have only his television interviews and his managerial record to judge him by, in that respect I'm not prepared to go along with the majority on here that he is some sort of villain. How many times does a fine upstanding pillar of the community have to be found guilty in a court of law before he becomes a villain?
|
|
|
Post by pottersrule on Feb 13, 2017 19:03:10 GMT
There's a difference. Stoke may be dealing with the PR clumsily but Pulis has shown himself up as the spiteful, vindictive bastard we know he is. What he objects to is the growing number of people who can see it. As for it being unimportant, if any other manager had leaked confidential details of a player before a game then left a phone message taunting the opposition club captain, you wouldn't be saying that. You're just one of the people who think Pulis is bigger than Stoke City. I'm simply saying that because the story that was leaked to the press about SB was true and not false it was unwise of Stoke to engage in a war of words in public with West Brom, what did they hope to achieve? Regarding the message to Ryan, Pulis has said he used the word loser but not in the context Mark Hughes is alleging, it's in Ryan's power to now clarify this issue beyond any reasonable doubt by responding. Regarding the character of Tony Pulis, I don't know him, have never met him and have only his television interviews and his managerial record to judge him by, in that respect I'm not prepared to go along with the majority on here that he is some sort of villain. He tried to aquire £2.5 million fraudently from Crystal Palace.If he hadn't had the funds to repay it he would of been hauled before a criminal court.He is very much a villain,accept it.
|
|
|
Post by roylandstoke on Feb 13, 2017 19:05:35 GMT
I'm not prepared to go along with the majority on here that he is some sort of villain. No need to go along with the majority on here when you can go along with the courts of law
|
|
|
Post by owdestokie on Feb 13, 2017 19:13:52 GMT
As I write we have had 736 posts on this subject from 36193 views which if my maths is correct is about 2%. I have absolutely no idea of how how many of the posts are from repeat posters.
It really does make me wonder at times whether certain individuals, including members of the admin team have such a depth of hate (sorry couldn't think of another word) for an ex employee (who by the way departed from our club several years ago) that they have to create or add fuel to any post that will prolong personal agendas
Come on guys lets be adult, lets move on and prioritise constructive debate about all things SCFC? This board is being spoilt!!!
|
|
|
Post by Birchesheadpotter on Feb 13, 2017 19:20:40 GMT
As I write we have had 736 posts on this subject from 36193 views which if my maths is correct is about 2%. I have absolutely no idea of how how many of the posts are from repeat posters. It really does make me wonder at times whether certain individuals, including members of the admin team have such a depth of hate (sorry couldn't think of another word) for an ex employee (who by the way departed from our club several years ago) that they have to create or add fuel to any post that will prolong personal agendas Come on guys lets be adult, lets move on and prioritise constructive debate about all things SCFC? This board is being spoilt!!! The subject being debated occurred last week mate.
|
|
|
Post by werrington on Feb 13, 2017 19:21:06 GMT
As I write we have had 736 posts on this subject from 36193 views which if my maths is correct is about 2%. I have absolutely no idea of how how many of the posts are from repeat posters. It really does make me wonder at times whether certain individuals, including members of the admin team have such a depth of hate (sorry couldn't think of another word) for an ex employee (who by the way departed from our club several years ago) that they have to create or add fuel to any post that will prolong personal agendas Come on guys lets be adult, lets move on and prioritise constructive debate about all things SCFC? This board is being spoilt!!! But it does concern SCFC and needs debating As for moving on, there's a reason it's being debated and that reason is Tony Pulis bearing an almighty grudge and it's posters like yourself who just bury their heads and deem his behaviour towards SCFC as acceptable It's him who can't move on
|
|
|
Post by geoff321 on Feb 13, 2017 19:27:34 GMT
I'm simply saying that because the story that was leaked to the press about SB was true and not false it was unwise of Stoke to engage in a war of words in public with West Brom, what did they hope to achieve? Regarding the message to Ryan, Pulis has said he used the word loser but not in the context Mark Hughes is alleging, it's in Ryan's power to now clarify this issue beyond any reasonable doubt by responding. Regarding the character of Tony Pulis, I don't know him, have never met him and have only his television interviews and his managerial record to judge him by, in that respect I'm not prepared to go along with the majority on here that he is some sort of villain. How many times does a fine upstanding pillar of the community have to be found guilty in a court of law before he becomes a villain? The court examined all the FACTS and found him guilty, that is slightly different than deciding someone is guilty on the Internet, before all the facts are available.
|
|
|
Post by manmarking on Feb 13, 2017 19:33:43 GMT
As I write we have had 736 posts on this subject from 36193 views which if my maths is correct is about 2%. I have absolutely no idea of how how many of the posts are from repeat posters. It really does make me wonder at times whether certain individuals, including members of the admin team have such a depth of hate (sorry couldn't think of another word) for an ex employee (who by the way departed from our club several years ago) that they have to create or add fuel to any post that will prolong personal agendas Come on guys lets be adult, lets move on and prioritise constructive debate about all things SCFC? This board is being spoilt!!! I don't think you're appreciating how views work in the online ecosphere mate In this case, geoff321 and polpotter have probably viewed the thread around 17,000 times each. They're both currently sobbing wretched tears into their West Brom replica shirts with each bleak refresh, throwing objects at walls and cursing all these horrible heathen words being blasphemed about their lordly messiah. That actually means the real response rate is quite high
|
|
|
Post by roylandstoke on Feb 13, 2017 19:35:02 GMT
How many times does a fine upstanding pillar of the community have to be found guilty in a court of law before he becomes a villain? The court examined all the FACTS and found him guilty, that is slightly different than deciding someone is guilty on the Internet, before all the facts are available. Pulis was pretty much accused of lying in court. He was labelled deceitful by a judge. Why would anyone believe his word over that of representatives of our club?
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Feb 13, 2017 19:36:04 GMT
As I write we have had 736 posts on this subject from 36193 views which if my maths is correct is about 2%. I have absolutely no idea of how how many of the posts are from repeat posters. It really does make me wonder at times whether certain individuals, including members of the admin team have such a depth of hate (sorry couldn't think of another word) for an ex employee (who by the way departed from our club several years ago) that they have to create or add fuel to any post that will prolong personal agendas Come on guys lets be adult, lets move on and prioritise constructive debate about all things SCFC? This board is being spoilt!!! We have a bloke trying to undermine our players, embarrass SCFC and send derogatory txts to our Captain. But we shouldn't talk about it? Would you like to comment on the 'depth of hate' he has for our club?
|
|
|
Post by geoff321 on Feb 13, 2017 19:37:59 GMT
The court examined all the FACTS and found him guilty, that is slightly different than deciding someone is guilty on the Internet, before all the facts are available. Pulis was pretty much accused of lying in court. He was labelled deceitful by a judge. Why would anyone believe his word over that of representatives of our club? Maybe, but we still need the facts, otherwise we go back to the dark ages.
|
|
|
Post by roylandstoke on Feb 13, 2017 19:48:44 GMT
Pulis was pretty much accused of lying in court. He was labelled deceitful by a judge. Why would anyone believe his word over that of representatives of our club? Maybe, but we still need the facts, otherwise we go back to the dark ages. The facts are a manager of one of our rivals seems to be trying to undermine our football club. Personally, I couldn't give a shiny shit who it is; if someone attacks my club they get abuse.
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Feb 13, 2017 20:05:56 GMT
Pulis was pretty much accused of lying in court. He was labelled deceitful by a judge. Why would anyone believe his word over that of representatives of our club? Maybe, but we still need the facts, otherwise we go back to the dark ages. The facts are that Pulis is a proven liar and crook (read the court transcripts) who is currently actively trying to undermine my club and its players. Another fact is that you're a wind up merchant with no association with this club who I would cheerfully smack in the mouth if I ever met you for the way you've spent years telling us that this man is more important than Stoke City. And I'm not even like that.
|
|
|
Post by owdestokie on Feb 13, 2017 21:16:11 GMT
Maybe, but we still need the facts, otherwise we go back to the dark ages. The facts are that Pulis is a proven liar and crook (read the court transcripts) who is currently actively trying to undermine my club and its players. Another fact is that you're a wind up merchant with no association with this club who I would cheerfully smack in the mouth if I ever met you for the way you've spent years telling us that this man is more important than Stoke City. And I'm not even like that. "Another fact is that you're a wind up merchant with no association with this club" Saw Stan Mathews return in 61, Was there for the Centenary, was there for Stan's benefit game, Travelled to Ajax, Two FA Cup semi finals, 1 league cup final, Autoglass Trophy Final, Promotions and relegations, Boothen stand/The Brit season ticket holder since 74, was accused of inciting Birmingham a riot, travelled to Valencia. So after supporting Stoke City over 50 years I don't need gob shite's like you trying to intimidate or tell me anything.
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Feb 13, 2017 21:30:18 GMT
Maybe, but we still need the facts, otherwise we go back to the dark ages. The facts are that Pulis is a proven liar and crook (read the court transcripts) who is currently actively trying to undermine my club and its players. Another fact is that you're a wind up merchant with no association with this club who I would cheerfully smack in the mouth if I ever met you for the way you've spent years telling us that this man is more important than Stoke City. And I'm not even like that. It's a bastard being a pacifist when there's people you want to give a good thumping to.
|
|