|
Post by jeycov on Aug 27, 2016 12:48:34 GMT
Tottenham looking shaky- hopefully this will carry over to next weekend
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2016 12:49:50 GMT
Not surprised in the slightest but very naively disappointed.
|
|
|
Post by ryan4england on Aug 27, 2016 12:50:09 GMT
Tottenham looking shaky- hopefully this will carry over to next weekend its a good job they are boarding the charity bus
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Aug 27, 2016 12:50:18 GMT
I don't think Dean fucked up on the Ryan decision, he was clearly grappling. I do think that he felt pressured to even it up though as the Sterling incident proved. Sorry if this upsets those that feel we're somehow victims because Ryan is a serial offender... Nail on head time but it won`t go down well with some? at least he did try to make amend`s with our penalty which is progress i suppose. Making amends? The stonewall penalty was the foul on Allen
|
|
|
Post by skemstokie on Aug 27, 2016 12:54:42 GMT
So far there's been two, one for us and one against, how are we being victimised? We had one last season and the only reason he gave them one is because he missed the pen on Allen. The first pen completely changed the game. The first goal is usually the most important even more so away from home as it put`s more pressure (crowd) on the home team so i agree.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2016 12:57:57 GMT
Is that dissent from Firmino?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2016 13:08:30 GMT
100% correct. Our penalty was given to even things up by a ref who knew he had fucked up. I don't think Dean fucked up on the Ryan decision, he was clearly grappling. I do think that he felt pressured to even it up though as the Sterling incident proved. Sorry if this upsets those that feel we're somehow victims because Ryan is a serial offender... I said the other day that the more I see the Shawcross incident the more i think it was a penalty. I don't have a problem with it being given at all as long as their is consistency. For me,the Sterling incident isn't a penalty at all and I felt Dean only gave that because he didn't give a clear penalty on Joe Allen in the first half for whatever reason, and I believe that after time to reflect on his decision to give the one against Ryan instead of issuing a warning first he wanted to even things up so he couldn't be accused of bias.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2016 13:08:40 GMT
I see our old mate Danny has just equalised for Spuds
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 27, 2016 13:18:21 GMT
Given the rules he didn't need to right a wrong, he got it right, so how were we victimised? So where have the other 83 penalties been this season then? Amazing how we were the first victims 18 months ago as well when the Swansea penalty was going to trigger a massive purge on grappling in the box. Fast forward to the ManUre v Chelsea game a few days later when both teams were assaulting each other in the box. Fuck all was done. I'm not saying there's a conspiracy against us per se, but anyone who thinks there isn't a big club bias whether it be conscious or sub-consciously is kidding themselves....,, Are Man City being victimised then too?
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Aug 27, 2016 13:40:51 GMT
If it was Stoke playing we'd have had 3 red cards. Mane should've gone and so should Matip. Gouranga.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2016 13:57:28 GMT
So where have the other 83 penalties been this season then? Amazing how we were the first victims 18 months ago as well when the Swansea penalty was going to trigger a massive purge on grappling in the box. Fast forward to the ManUre v Chelsea game a few days later when both teams were assaulting each other in the box. Fuck all was done. I'm not saying there's a conspiracy against us per se, but anyone who thinks there isn't a big club bias whether it be conscious or sub-consciously is kidding themselves....,, Are Man City being victimised then too? I give up fella. Can't try and explain the difference for a 3rd time....,
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 27, 2016 13:59:35 GMT
Are Man City being victimised then too? I give up fella. Can't try and explain the difference for a 3rd time...., No some have said or hinted at us being victims because we got a pen against us because of holding, which would be fine if we were the only ones, we weren't so it completely voids that nonsense opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2016 14:06:39 GMT
I give up fella. Can't try and explain the difference for a 3rd time...., No some have said or hinted at us being victims because we got a pen against us because of holding, which would be fine if we were the only ones, we weren't so it completely voids that nonsense opinion. Not when one is given after your team goes 2-0 down and has a clear cut penalty turned down. Chalk and cheese.....
|
|