|
|
Post by stokecity4eva on Aug 13, 2016 16:14:16 GMT
Don't know if it's the first use of it in the world or just in the states
Don't know what to make of it personally doesn't seem to take him very long to make the decision however there's surely a better way to do it than just having a bloke walking round the pitch holding a tv.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Aug 13, 2016 16:15:42 GMT
Didn't Zidane get sent off in the World Cup final because the 4th official saw the replay on tv?
|
|
|
|
Post by redandwhitetundra on Aug 13, 2016 16:47:18 GMT
Hang on.
The ref was told he should have been sent off, not that the free kick should have been a penalty..?
Good to see the VAR in play, but not convinced a ref should need assistance to decide between no card and a red card in that manner!?
|
|
|
|
Post by GoBoks on Aug 13, 2016 23:35:55 GMT
Rugby has been doing this for decades. In my opinion a better system - the VAR reviews the tape and tells ref their recommendation just like a linesman does.
The ref running to the sideline looks ridiculous,
|
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Aug 13, 2016 23:41:36 GMT
Didn't Zidane get sent off in the World Cup final because the 4th official saw the replay on tv? That is a huge ongoing bone of discontent from the French. If that happened it shouldn't have been red. They insist the lino told the ref. Not sure myself. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2016 11:43:59 GMT
They just roll the fucking LG out and he watches on the sideline hahah pisser.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on Aug 14, 2016 11:48:11 GMT
Not for me although I understand the desire people have to get a decision tight. But rugby, cricket, tennis etc. are start/stop games whereas football should be far more flowing end to end and none stop.
|
|
