|
|
Post by nott1 on May 15, 2016 16:48:15 GMT
By Whelan, what a stop, about 95% over the line. This is something we've not been doing all season. Well done man.
|
|
|
|
Post by foxysgloves on May 15, 2016 17:05:02 GMT
It was a thing of beauty.
I luuuuurrrrrvvvveeee Glenn.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on May 15, 2016 17:05:55 GMT
Good job he did something today. He was diabolical.
|
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on May 15, 2016 17:06:17 GMT
Them goal line scrambles were great. Nothing like hanging on by the skin of your teeth to galvanise belief that you can nick it  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2016 17:08:04 GMT
Superb
|
|
|
|
Post by chrisparker on May 15, 2016 17:10:57 GMT
Whelan was poor for the majority of the game but that was a moment of huge significance. We should always have men on the post from now on.
|
|
|
|
Post by estrangedsonoffaye on May 15, 2016 17:17:10 GMT
Men on the posts, as applicable at grass roots as it is at the top table.
|
|
|
|
Post by nutterpotter on May 15, 2016 17:17:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on May 15, 2016 17:19:40 GMT
Good job he did something today. He was diabolical. And that being nice! |
|
|
|
Post by foxysgloves on May 15, 2016 17:20:26 GMT
Good job he did something today. He was diabolical. I'm amazed. How did we manage to beat a side going flat out for the top six when two of our players were apparently so poor?? |
|
|
|
Post by ysc1 on May 15, 2016 17:21:52 GMT
Good job he did something today. He was diabolical. Was he? |
|
|
|
Post by WhyDelilah on May 15, 2016 17:22:49 GMT
Whelan was utterly atrocious today.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gods on May 15, 2016 17:24:05 GMT
The £1.2 million goal line clearance you might say, being the difference in prize money between 9th and 10th  |
|
|
|
Post by callas12 on May 15, 2016 17:25:03 GMT
That little spell was PROPER Stoke City defending like we're usually used to from the boys in red & white. Still think that Given save on the 1 on 1 helped us on our way to the 3pts today. Game was gone if that had gone in..
|
|
|
|
Post by no1972 on May 15, 2016 17:28:48 GMT
Whelan was utterly atrocious today. He was no better or worse than any of the midfield today,but it must be hard when the other two don't like tackling or chasing back after they have lost the ball,but he must be wank he didn't cost 18 million or play for Barca. |
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on May 15, 2016 17:29:16 GMT
The £1.2 million goal line clearance you might say, being the difference in prize money between 9th and 10th Or shay's £1.2 million save.? Or Diouf's £1.2 million header. Or Charlie's £1.2 million corner. |
|
|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on May 15, 2016 17:31:03 GMT
Whelan was utterly atrocious today. He was no better or worse than any of the midfield today,but it must be hard when the other two don't like tackling or chasing back after they have lost the ball,but he must be wank he didn't cost 18 million or play for Barca. No,he was wank because he was wank. ..that simple. |
|
|
|
Post by WhyDelilah on May 15, 2016 17:33:20 GMT
Whelan was utterly atrocious today. He was no better or worse than any of the midfield today,but it must be hard when the other two don't like tackling or chasing back after they have lost the ball,but he must be wank he didn't cost 18 million or play for Barca. He was just shit today. No need to get precious. |
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on May 15, 2016 17:33:50 GMT
Whelan was utterly atrocious today. He was no better or worse than any of the midfield today,but it must be hard when the other two don't like tackling or chasing back after they have lost the ball,but he must be wank he didn't cost 18 million or play for Barca. So that's the crux of it then? It's ok for him to have a stinker. |
|
|
|
Post by no1972 on May 15, 2016 17:36:47 GMT
He was no better or worse than any of the midfield today,but it must be hard when the other two don't like tackling or chasing back after they have lost the ball,but he must be wank he didn't cost 18 million or play for Barca. So that's the crux of it then? It's ok for him to have a stinker. No I agree he was poor today but they all were so why pick on one. |
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on May 15, 2016 17:39:19 GMT
So that's the crux of it then? It's ok for him to have a stinker. No I agree he was poor today but they all were so why pick on one. Yes they were, but obviously it's ok to single out other players for criticism? |
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on May 15, 2016 17:40:45 GMT
He came out of the womb backwards ffs.
|
|
|
|
Post by block23 on May 15, 2016 17:44:07 GMT
Good job he did something today. He was diabolical. All about opinions I guess. With the ball he was poor, no worse than most though. However, his work rate was excellent, made numerous tackles, and at times was the only player doing anything in midfield. Poor, but not diabolical in my opinion |
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on May 15, 2016 17:45:08 GMT
If we could merge Imbula with Whelan, we'd have some player!!
|
|
|
|
Post by no1972 on May 15, 2016 17:51:03 GMT
If we could merge Imbula with Whelan, we'd have some player!! We agree. |
|
|
|
Post by silverdollar on May 15, 2016 17:56:49 GMT
Good job he did something today. He was diabolical. ????????????????????????????????????? Knob! |
|
|
|
Post by iloveglennwhelan on May 15, 2016 18:09:55 GMT
WHEN I GET THAT FEELING!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2016 18:41:31 GMT
There were two of them within 10 minutes or so of each other.
Great resilience, hopefully we can carry this over into next season.
|
|
|
|
Post by passtheoatcakes on May 15, 2016 19:01:24 GMT
He was no better or worse than any of the midfield today,but it must be hard when the other two don't like tackling or chasing back after they have lost the ball,but he must be wank he didn't cost 18 million or play for Barca. He was just shit today. No need to get precious. No he wasn't...next..... |
|
|
|
Post by passtheoatcakes on May 15, 2016 19:02:00 GMT
He was no better or worse than any of the midfield today,but it must be hard when the other two don't like tackling or chasing back after they have lost the ball,but he must be wank he didn't cost 18 million or play for Barca. No,he was wank because he was wank. ..that simple. No he wasn't...next.... |
|
