|
Post by bathstoke on Apr 8, 2016 18:50:13 GMT
These are a peculiarity of British Law. Usually the V rich & famous attempting to circumvent freedom of speech to protect their public image. This current one doing the rounds has children's protection as it's legitimacy. Obviously there was the whole Ryan Giggs debacle, but where does this leave the freedom of speech/press...
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Apr 8, 2016 19:02:47 GMT
I don't get how it's child protection though, they're saying that it's ok to cheat and lie by having the 3some in the first place - these are not the correct morals and stand against the justice systems main point in promoting the truth.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Apr 8, 2016 19:56:02 GMT
It does smack of double/triple standards
|
|
|
Post by lastoftheldk on Apr 8, 2016 21:27:15 GMT
Clue
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Apr 8, 2016 21:55:15 GMT
These are a peculiarity of British Law. Usually the V rich & famous attempting to circumvent freedom of speech to protect their public image. This current one doing the rounds has children's protection as it's legitimacy. Obviously there was the whole Ryan Giggs debacle, but where does this leave the freedom of speech/press... the problem is that the perceived truth comes out first and overshadows the real case. A delicate balance. It's great we have the Internet. The likes of ryan Higgs always comes out Where a story with no famous people will usually keep the confidentiality that case needs
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Apr 8, 2016 21:55:48 GMT
I don't get how it's child protection though, they're saying that it's ok to cheat and lie by having the 3some in the first place - these are not the correct morals and stand against the justice systems main point in promoting the truth. what case is this
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Apr 8, 2016 21:57:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by desman2 on Apr 8, 2016 21:58:29 GMT
This shows how stupid these people are. They seem to forget that with the internet there is always a way. They also fail to understand that when they do something like this they are sending out an invitation for anyone to find out who they are.
|
|
|
Post by lastoftheldk on Apr 8, 2016 22:00:53 GMT
Typical
|
|
|
Post by richie22 on Apr 8, 2016 23:15:45 GMT
If the 'rocket man' leaves himself open to be exposed in the press he deserves everything he gets. Just behave , rumours of security guards getting felt up, flats being bought for personal trainers , 'super injunctions' when Youve done nowt wrong . This won't end well for him
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Apr 9, 2016 6:54:04 GMT
If the 'rocket man' leaves himself open to be exposed in the press he deserves everything he gets. Just behave , rumours of security guards getting felt up, flats being bought for personal trainers , 'super injunctions' when Youve done nowt wrong . This won't end well for him It's tame compared to what Freddie Murcury used to get upto, but Freddy wasn't so deceitful as to cunjour up a fabricated persona, using other people as part of his pantomime
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Apr 9, 2016 7:03:23 GMT
I don't give a flying fook about which celebrity is knobbing or being knobbed, as long as Kylie is still a virgin then I have hope.
As for the injunctions, they are there to stop people's indiscretions getting out, if anybody tries to fabricate a story on somebody, they can be taken to the cleaners by rich peoples lawyers.
|
|
|
Post by starkiller on Apr 9, 2016 16:52:44 GMT
Nothing compared to the amount 'D-notices' about government.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2016 17:38:49 GMT
I don't get how it's child protection though, they're saying that it's ok to cheat and lie by having the 3some in the first place - these are not the correct morals and stand against the justice systems main point in promoting the truth. Based on that link posted further down, the two have an open relationship, and so the the cheating and lying comes on the part of the person who is trying to sell the story. I presume it's implied that discretion would be a prerequisite for him to have participated else he wouldn't be seeking the injunction now. It'd be nice if the press were more interested in exposing corruption rather than peddling salacious rubbish. I don't see how that is newsworthy enough to justify a front page.
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Apr 15, 2016 6:43:17 GMT
Looks like this injunction maybe over today, as it's going back before the Judge. If it gets lifted, how long do you give the marriage...
|
|
|
Post by bringmesunshine on Apr 15, 2016 8:52:34 GMT
Tantrums and Tiaras
|
|
|
Post by ihaveadream on Apr 15, 2016 12:56:57 GMT
When people found out they laughed so much that not many could claim afterwards they were still standing
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Apr 15, 2016 13:24:58 GMT
He's certainly having a tantrum now everyone knows about his dirty little secret lol
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Apr 23, 2016 17:14:36 GMT
The super injunction maybe shirt-lifted nxt week
|
|