|
|
Post by cheekymatt71 on Mar 19, 2016 16:58:48 GMT
I totally love the guy, and hes our own little link to Leicester winning the title.
Im so made up for him and his old-skool defending style. We are with you Robert, I like to think we sent you out as our own personal agent to win the league and fuck over the big boys!
Keep on winning The Berlin Wall
|
|
|
|
Post by gonk on Mar 19, 2016 17:04:43 GMT
I totally love the guy, and hes our own little link to Leicester winning the title. Im so made up for him and his old-skool defending style. We are with you Robert, I like to think we sent you out as our own personal agent to win the league and fuck over the big boys! Keep on winning The Berlin Wall When he played for us all the pundits made out he was a hatchet man.Now he's top of the Prem he's flavour of the month.  |
|
|
|
Post by Boothen on Mar 19, 2016 17:09:16 GMT
Strange how that simian faced duplicitous cunt, Keown, is gushing praise for Huth today. Yet when he played for us he was nowt but a static thug.
I love Huth, we should never have sold him.
|
|
|
|
Post by fca47 on Mar 19, 2016 17:12:09 GMT
All the sages on here were saying he's not needed at Stoke , and he was being put out to pasture. Who's laughing now. Made up for him, great pro.
|
|
|
|
Post by ryan4england on Mar 19, 2016 17:23:13 GMT
All the sages on here were saying he's not needed at Stoke , and he was being put out to pasture. Who's laughing now. Made up for him, great pro. And to think not too long back we had both him & shawcross in defence. Big bollock dropped |
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Mar 19, 2016 17:33:57 GMT
All the sages on here were saying he's not needed at Stoke , and he was being put out to pasture. Who's laughing now. Made up for him, great pro. And to think not too long back we had both him & shawcross in defence. Big bollock dropped Yeah since he's gone we've let in more goals and finished lower in the league, oh no hang on  |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Mar 19, 2016 19:42:47 GMT
All the sages on here were saying he's not needed at Stoke , and he was being put out to pasture. Who's laughing now. Made up for him, great pro. And to think not too long back we had both him & shawcross in defence. Big bollock dropped Hughes's biggest mistake yet, he must cringe every time he hears his name or how Leicester are romping away with the title, whatever possessed him to let him go and so so cheap is a mystery seems to struggle spotting proper defenders does Mark and his team. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2016 19:44:49 GMT
Is it that time of the week already?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on Mar 19, 2016 19:47:29 GMT
Oh good.
Well done for a great game FOR STOKE CITY PHIL.
|
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Mar 19, 2016 19:48:17 GMT
And to think not too long back we had both him & shawcross in defence. Big bollock dropped Hughes's biggest mistake yet, he must cringe every time he hears his name or how Leicester are romping away with the title, whatever possessed him to let him go and so so cheap is a mystery seems to struggle spotting proper defenders does Mark and his team. It happens to the best, fergie - pogba. |
|
|
|
Post by crownmeking on Mar 19, 2016 19:58:49 GMT
Embarrassing thread of the week.
|
|
|
|
Post by ryan4england on Mar 19, 2016 20:02:15 GMT
And to think not too long back we had both him & shawcross in defence. Big bollock dropped Hughes's biggest mistake yet, he must cringe every time he hears his name or how Leicester are romping away with the title, whatever possessed him to let him go and so so cheap is a mystery seems to struggle spotting proper defenders does Mark and his team. I can see why he chose to do it, Huth probs wanted to be first choice next to Shawcross at his age but Hughes wanted a player better on the ball. It's not a philosophy I agree with, forme your central defenders are supposed to be "defenders", especially withfull backs moving forward. I struggle to get the benefit of not protecting the centre of your own goal with 2 out and out 'stoppers' in the team at the same time |
|
|
|
Post by generationex on Mar 19, 2016 20:06:03 GMT
Unforced fuck up.
But hey ho, no manager is perfect.
Still annoying though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2016 20:14:52 GMT
It's like TP we can't have a reasonable thread on either him or Huth because this forum is chock full of dickheads.
I've said this before but fuck it, Huth is an excellent defender, in the right set-up. Leicester play as deep as any team I've ever seen, in this set up centre halves like Morgan and Huth who are immensely tall, strong and powerful are fantastic because many of them share the same flaw (a lack of pace and the potential to be turned inside out by tricky players) when you have as many men as Leicester do in an around the box and a back line as deep as theirs is these flaws are more of less nullified.
Huth looked wank under Hughes, we were absolutely right to sell him when we did and I'm thrilled he has gone to a set up that suits him to an absolute tee and I think he will have a Premier League winners medal round his neck in a few weeks time, one he thoroughly deserves.
He would be utterly shit for us, but he is far from utterly shit.
|
|
|
|
Post by bigjohnritchie on Mar 19, 2016 20:28:17 GMT
The aerial threat from him and Ryan at set pieces were significant as well
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2016 20:35:13 GMT
I love Huthy, but he's gone.
We're good without him and we'd be good with him. Let it go chaps
|
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Mar 19, 2016 20:40:48 GMT
And to think not too long back we had both him & shawcross in defence. Big bollock dropped Hughes's biggest mistake yet, he must cringe every time he hears his name or how Leicester are romping away with the title, whatever possessed him to let him go and so so cheap is a mystery seems to struggle spotting proper defenders does Mark and his team. Yet his defenders let in less goals than the Pulis back 8 did and finish higher in the league than a pulis team ever has |
|
|
|
Post by ryan4england on Mar 19, 2016 20:46:59 GMT
Hughes's biggest mistake yet, he must cringe every time he hears his name or how Leicester are romping away with the title, whatever possessed him to let him go and so so cheap is a mystery seems to struggle spotting proper defenders does Mark and his team. Yet his defenders let in less goals than the Pulis back 8 did and finish higher in the league than a pulis team ever has We spent half the game in our own half though without the ball under Pulis, now we keep posession(or try too), no idea what it means but it must mean something |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Mar 19, 2016 20:51:10 GMT
Hughes's biggest mistake yet, he must cringe every time he hears his name or how Leicester are romping away with the title, whatever possessed him to let him go and so so cheap is a mystery seems to struggle spotting proper defenders does Mark and his team. Yet his defenders let in less goals than the Pulis back 8 did and finish higher in the league than a pulis team ever has Under the caped rat we seldom had the ball for long enough periods that we were under almost constant pressure at the back, under Hughes we have a lot more possession which means we are not under pressure as much at the back, simple really I believe that if had kept Huth we would not have the -goal difference we have now, he also chips in with a few goals most seasons something our CB's have failed to do so it is a double edged sword. Massive bollock dropped and no amount of excuses/reasons will change the fact that Huth is a better CB than all but one of the CB's we have at our club this season. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Mar 19, 2016 20:53:00 GMT
Yet his defenders let in less goals than the Pulis back 8 did and finish higher in the league than a pulis team ever has We spent half the game in our own half though without the ball under Pulis, now we keep posession(or try too), no idea what it means but it must mean something Beat me to it simple enough reason or so you would have thought, grasping at straws also springs to mind. |
|
|
|
Post by Los Alfareros on Mar 19, 2016 20:53:54 GMT
Cant believe the real reason Huth left hasnt been aired on here, everyone knows right???
|
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Mar 19, 2016 20:54:44 GMT
Yet his defenders let in less goals than the Pulis back 8 did and finish higher in the league than a pulis team ever has Under the caped rat we seldom had the ball for long enough periods that we were under almost constant pressure at the back, under Hughes we have a lot more possession which means we are not under pressure as much at the back, simple really I believe that if had kept Huth we would not have the -goal difference we have now, he also chips in with a few goals most seasons something our CB's have failed to do so it is a double edged sword. Massive bollock dropped and no amount of excuses/reasons will change the fact that Huth is a better CB than all but one of the CB's we have at our club this season. Excellent so you agree Hughes signs better players than TP, how about Hughes playing with 4 in defence instead of 8 |
|
|
|
Post by roostershair on Mar 19, 2016 20:55:38 GMT
Robert Huth, Huth, Huth, he's a a massive German youth. Good on yer big man!
|
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Mar 19, 2016 20:56:22 GMT
Yet his defenders let in less goals than the Pulis back 8 did and finish higher in the league than a pulis team ever has We spent half the game in our own half though without the ball under Pulis, now we keep posession(or try too), no idea what it means but it must mean something If you don't play a back 8 you can play some attacking players and try and win games. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Mar 19, 2016 21:01:36 GMT
We spent half the game in our own half though without the ball under Pulis, now we keep posession(or try too), no idea what it means but it must mean something If you don't play a back 8 you can play some attacking players and try and win games.  you are getting there, we have much more possession under Hughes therefore we are under less defensive pressure hence we should concede less goals, what has that to do with selling the second best defender on our books to a rival club for peanuts ?, are you suggesting Wolly, Muniesa, Wilson or Cameron are better CB's than Huth. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2016 21:02:57 GMT
Cant believe the real reason Huth left hasnt been aired on here, everyone knows right??? It's because he was too good for us, according to the way this lot are gushing. Fucking Maldini on here. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Mar 19, 2016 21:03:21 GMT
Under the caped rat we seldom had the ball for long enough periods that we were under almost constant pressure at the back, under Hughes we have a lot more possession which means we are not under pressure as much at the back, simple really I believe that if had kept Huth we would not have the -goal difference we have now, he also chips in with a few goals most seasons something our CB's have failed to do so it is a double edged sword. Massive bollock dropped and no amount of excuses/reasons will change the fact that Huth is a better CB than all but one of the CB's we have at our club this season. Excellent so you agree Hughes signs better players than TP, how about Hughes playing with 4 in defence instead of 8 Signs better players in general yes, not so sure he signs better defenders though. |
|
|
|
Post by numpty40 on Mar 19, 2016 21:04:06 GMT
I think that if we'd kept Huth we'd have won the league already and then next season we'd have won the Champions league as well as the FA cup and Autoglass Trophy, he really was that good.
|
|
|
|
Post by ryan4england on Mar 19, 2016 21:04:07 GMT
We spent half the game in our own half though without the ball under Pulis, now we keep posession(or try too), no idea what it means but it must mean something If you don't play a back 8 you can play some attacking players and try and win games. What benefits us though in having a lesser (imo) 'defender' in the heart our defence? What have we seen is offered to us this season that justifies having a footballing defender in the side ahead of two primary 'stoppers'? It's a genuine question because all I've seen it do differently is make us pass it around at the back at times like a practice session instead of getting the ball forward? |
|
|
|
Post by sufolkstokie on Mar 19, 2016 21:06:15 GMT
Wolly was again immense today - just thought I would say whilst this thread wanders aimlessly to we let him go should we/shouldn't we = if he was here we would not win the league
|
|
you are getting there, we have much more possession under Hughes therefore we are under less defensive pressure hence we should concede less goals, what has that to do with selling the second best defender on our books to a rival club for peanuts ?, are you suggesting Wolly, Muniesa, Wilson or Cameron are better CB's than Huth. 
