|
|
Post by numpty40 on Feb 2, 2016 22:10:58 GMT
can we have it back please.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beloved Monkfish on Feb 2, 2016 22:11:41 GMT
All of our current strikers are false number 9s.
|
|
|
|
Post by paulvictoria on Feb 2, 2016 22:24:06 GMT
exactly what I posted why change it and go backwards
|
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Feb 2, 2016 22:26:47 GMT
Remember this guy?..  |
|
|
|
Post by stokiemarc on Feb 2, 2016 22:28:44 GMT
----Imbula---Whelan
Shaq----Affellay----Arnie
---------Bojan----------
This HAS got to be the way forward
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2016 22:29:32 GMT
Remember this guy?.. Is that Walters? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2016 22:30:23 GMT
False number 9 was perfect for tonight.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokeoptimist on Feb 2, 2016 22:31:27 GMT
Remember this guy?.. Yes he's not been playing very well so he has been dropped! |
|
|
|
Post by dieguito88 on Feb 2, 2016 22:31:30 GMT
False number 9 was perfect for tonight. Pacey striker was perfect tonight. We didn't have a shot on target. Adam too for me was a good shout for tonight. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2016 22:33:10 GMT
A false 9 wouldn't stop us conceding shit goals though.
|
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Feb 2, 2016 22:33:25 GMT
Remember this guy?.. Yes he's not been playing very well so he has been dropped! Missed a couple of chances against West Ham then hung out to dry on the wing ever since then? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 2, 2016 22:33:41 GMT
False number 9 was perfect for tonight. Pacey striker was perfect tonight. We didn't have a shot on target. Adam too for me was a good shout for tonight. Our movement at times pulled utd about a bit. We got in some good positions but shooting was awful. False number 9 would have had them pulling there hair out. Especially shaq against that clown of a left back. But yet again scfc charity turned up |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Feb 2, 2016 22:34:21 GMT
False number 9 was perfect for tonight. Pacey striker was perfect tonight. We didn't have a shot on target. Adam too for me was a good shout for tonight. Adam is injured,out for a while |
|
|
|
Post by dieguito88 on Feb 2, 2016 22:36:34 GMT
Pacey striker was perfect tonight. We didn't have a shot on target. Adam too for me was a good shout for tonight. Our movement at times pulled utd about a bit. We got in some good positions but shooting was awful. False number 9 would have had them pulling there hair out. Especially shaq against that clown of a left back. But yet again scfc charity turned up False 9 or pace striker: movements upfront and not a static front striker giving them a big advantage in defence |
|
|
|
Post by chrisparker on Feb 3, 2016 3:02:25 GMT
exactly what I posted why change it and go backwards Um because ti wasn't working? |
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Feb 3, 2016 5:51:27 GMT
Yes he's not been playing very well so he has been dropped! Missed a couple of chances against West Ham then hung out to dry on the wing ever since then? Much closer to the truth. If we're dropping people for not playing well I expect quite a few changes for the next match. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 3, 2016 6:50:21 GMT
Can we not?
It got found out good and proper.
So so easy to defend against.
Hopefully Imbula can change that.
|
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Feb 3, 2016 7:06:32 GMT
Can we not? It got found out good and proper. So so easy to defend against. Hopefully Imbula can change that. He'll help. The opposition will have something to worry about from our midfield for once. |
|
|
|
Post by bathstoke on Feb 3, 2016 15:51:44 GMT
can we have it back please. Is it similar to the Hateful 8 |
|
|
|
Post by jezzascfc on Feb 3, 2016 16:53:35 GMT
can we have it back please. Is it similar to the Hateful 8 We're all hoping, with Imbula to add to BMX, it will be more like the Fantastic Four! |
|
|
|
Post by numpty40 on Feb 3, 2016 18:57:12 GMT
exactly what I posted why change it and go backwards Um because ti wasn't working? Six games with the 'false 9', won 3, drew 1, lost 2, scored 10 and 7 against Six games after, won 2, drew 1, lost 3, scored 4 and conceded 8. Not an exact science I admit but I wouldn't describe it as not working. |
|
|
|
Post by chrisparker on Feb 3, 2016 19:00:45 GMT
Um because ti wasn't working? Six games with the 'false 9', won 3, drew 1, lost 2, scored 10 and 7 against Six games after, won 2, drew 1, lost 3, scored 4 and conceded 8. Not an exact science I admit but I wouldn't describe it as not working. After those godawful performances against Wes Brom & Liverpool (at home), everyone on this board was calling for a change in formation. And that's what happened. And btw Shaqiri was injured against Norwich & Arsenal so false 9 wasn't an option. |
|
|
|
Post by numpty40 on Feb 6, 2016 21:03:39 GMT
Um because ti wasn't working? Six games with the 'false 9', won 3, drew 1, lost 2, scored 10 and 7 against Six games after, won 2, drew 1, lost 3, scored 4 and conceded 8. Not an exact science I admit but I wouldn't describe it as not working. Update: Six games with the 'false 9', won 3, drew 1, lost 2, scored 10 and 7 against Seven games after, won 2, drew 1, lost 4, scored 4 and conceded 11. Read more: oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/253734/false-number-9#ixzz3zQLc3tHs |
|
