|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Mar 13, 2004 22:37:14 GMT
just seen his goal on premiership that was disallowed, worst decision i have seen in ages, suppose he made up for it with the quality free-kick that wasnt disallowed
|
|
|
|
Post by haj23scfc on Mar 13, 2004 22:46:40 GMT
yeah was a goal as it had left friedel's hands, will Souness ever admit that Blackburn are shit?! hes such a wanker!
Arsenal to remain unbeaten in the league at 3/1, surely a bargain!
haha those goals on the premiership!
|
|
|
|
Post by Trout_Licker on Mar 13, 2004 22:47:40 GMT
Cant wait to see Henry at the Brit next season ;D
It was defo a goal
|
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Mar 13, 2004 22:48:28 GMT
yeah i think i might put a few quid on them remaining unbeaten, i was considering it earlier on in the season, i can remeber at one point being able to get 7-1 and prob a lot longer odds than that  |
|
|
|
Post by haj23scfc on Mar 13, 2004 22:50:50 GMT
I love watching Arsenal, they are so entertaining unlike Man U!
Treble at 7/1?
|
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Mar 13, 2004 22:55:09 GMT
no i meant a few months ago they were offering 7-1 on arsenal remaining unbeaten
|
|
|
|
Post by haj23scfc on Mar 13, 2004 22:56:51 GMT
yeah i know mate
i was questioning your opinion on 7/1 for arsenal to win the treble! well they were the odds on wednesday, prob gone down now!
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Mar 13, 2004 22:59:53 GMT
Can't see them winning the treble. Must have been a fix that draw, cause they don't like England. Arsenal Chelski and the winner v Madrid. Too obvious ???  |
|
|
|
Post by haj23scfc on Mar 13, 2004 23:01:44 GMT
Real won't win! Arsenal would go through their defence like a knife through butter!
|
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Mar 13, 2004 23:08:22 GMT
yeah treble looks a good bet ive just had an accumulator for tomorrow
wolves bt villa
man city bt man ure
spurs bt newcastle
southampton bt liverpool
thought its worth a quid
ive also had
same as above but the away teams instead except man ure
|
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Mar 13, 2004 23:10:54 GMT
Real Madrids defence could prove their undoing. Monaco are good attacking and will make problems for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by haj23scfc on Mar 13, 2004 23:11:56 GMT
man city to draw with man u then mark!
villa SHOULD nail wolves!
|
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Mar 13, 2004 23:23:15 GMT
never realised that okocka hasnt scored a prem goal this season |
|
maucek
Academy Starlet
Posts: 151
|
Post by maucek on Mar 14, 2004 0:49:40 GMT
Perhaps it should have been allowed technically looking at the rules of the game, but if that is legal, then it shouldn't be.
It's not football played in the sporting manner that it should be played. He didn't do anything that actually deserved a goal through skillful play, he just kicked the ball out of the keepers hands.
What's more, not everyone is as skillful as Henry, and if that sort of play is encouraged, someone's leg is going to get broken.
|
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Mar 14, 2004 1:18:37 GMT
I wish we had Real Madrid's defence. |
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Mar 14, 2004 1:21:31 GMT
If we did staffs we'd do well against Reading or Coventry but as soon as we get that League Cup game away to Milan or Benfica we'd struggle!! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Mar 14, 2004 1:27:45 GMT
Joe,your starting to sound like stokief. |
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Mar 14, 2004 1:33:04 GMT
Yeah good point Staffs. Only when I storm off it comes from the heart!  |
|
|
|
Post by northstokie on Mar 14, 2004 11:52:21 GMT
maucek, he didn't kick the ball out of the keeper's hands, the ball had already been released, the ball was in play and Henry didn't dangerously win it either. Should have been allowed, and if you think it is not skillful play, would you begrudge Oulare's deflected 'arse goal'........ i think not
|
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Mar 14, 2004 12:06:06 GMT
The ref was right to disallow it.
It was dangerous play and unsporting behaviour.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pricey on Mar 14, 2004 13:40:45 GMT
Dangerous my arse, this is football not knitting. Unsporting yes; very. If that kind of thing would be allowed, a goalkeeper would no longer be able to kick out of their hands would they? Time for a slight rule change to say that a 'keeper is still in control of the ball between it leaving his hands and him kicking it (in that situation). Another thing. When Dion Dublin and Robbie Keane have done the old trick of going off behind the goal, waiting until the keeper has thrown the ball on the floor, and then dashed around and scored, why have the goals stood?! Staying off the field of play in order to gain an advantage isn't allowed is it? And you are meant to ask the referee's permission before coming back on if you have gone off deliberately are you not? There is clearly a loop-hole there if a players momentum takes him off the pitch, and also goalkeepers shouldn't be so stupid, but how unsporting is that?!  |
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Mar 14, 2004 13:44:55 GMT
If you go off the field of play, you should not be allowed back on until a set piece (eg throw in, goal kick, free kick, peno etc)
|
|
|
|
Post by BigDick on Mar 14, 2004 15:56:24 GMT
The Ref was quite right NOT to allow that goal (cor I sound like Rex!). Keepers have 6 seconds to release the ball, if players are allowed to baulk their kicks it will be mayhem, and DaveF is right, somebody will get hurt!
OK the ball was not in his hands, how else is he going to kick it ???. If he had rolled it out it would have been a totally different matter. Same applies to AA at Reading - both Ade & Henry were lucky npot to get yellow cards, harsh as that might have been.
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Mar 14, 2004 16:02:21 GMT
If that was in reference to what i said, i meant when players go off the pitch (out of the boundary of play)
That is the bit about 'had he rolled it in front of himself'
|
|
|
|
Post by lurcherthelurker on Mar 14, 2004 16:04:42 GMT
The Ref was quite right NOT to allow that goal (cor I sound like Rex!). Keepers have 6 seconds to release the ball, if players are allowed to baulk their kicks it will be mayhem, and DaveF is right, somebody will get hurt! OK the ball was not in his hands, how else is he going to kick it ???. If he had rolled it out it would have been a totally different matter. Same applies to AA at Reading - both Ade & Henry were lucky npot to get yellow cards, harsh as that might have been. Alright Junior? ;D and it is covered in the laws of the game as well, Did Henry get cautioned? cos he should of done, as should of Ade !! |
|
|
|
Post by BigDick on Mar 14, 2004 16:12:07 GMT
I have you as my mentor ;D and I learn quick. Caused quite a 'tiff' in my household last night as my 17 year old reckoned it was fair game - ah, callow youth  |
|
|
|
Post by lurcherthelurker on Mar 14, 2004 16:31:24 GMT
Ok Junior remember this bit to tell your boy.
Law 12.
An indirect free kcik is also awarded to the opposing team if a player, in the opinion of the referee:
Plays in a dangerous manner
Impedes the progress of an opponent
;D
Waits patiently for the shit to hit the fan
|
|
|
|
Post by Pricey on Mar 14, 2004 18:27:57 GMT
He didn't prevent the goalkeeper from releasing the ball from his hands though did he Rex?
|
|
|
|
Post by lurcherthelurker on Mar 14, 2004 18:40:51 GMT
By kicking the ball away as the keeper was releasing the ball from his hands is in fact Impeding the goalkeeper is it not?
|
|
