|
|
Post by wrightspies on Aug 30, 2015 11:21:50 GMT
lost then had to play the winning team on the last game of the season who needed a win to get into Europe. We were mathematically safe. Would we purposely lose to get into Europe ourselves?
|
|
|
|
Post by interestedobserver on Aug 30, 2015 11:24:11 GMT
Don't think it works that way anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by wrightspies on Aug 30, 2015 11:34:39 GMT
Forgot about that. Ok so hypothetically if they changed the rule back.
|
|
|
|
Post by marwood on Aug 30, 2015 13:42:00 GMT
No
|
|
|
|
Post by wrightspies on Aug 30, 2015 15:48:30 GMT
And miss out on a Europa League spot? |
|
|
|
Post by marwood on Aug 30, 2015 16:25:40 GMT
Doesn't work like that anymore
|
|
|
|
Post by wrightspies on Aug 31, 2015 10:07:06 GMT
Doesn't work like that anymore Like I said before. Hypothetically if they changed the rule back. |
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Aug 31, 2015 10:11:45 GMT
Depends on how we were doing in the League. If we struggled and scraped 17th with a couple of games left then it wouldn't be worth the pressure for the following season, but it we were comfortably around tenth then I'd like to think another European adventure would be worth the three points.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2015 11:01:13 GMT
Didn't this already happen, or was it just a Bobby Ewing in the shower moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by marwood on Sept 1, 2015 13:46:07 GMT
Doesn't work like that anymore Like I said before. Hypothetically if they changed the rule back. apologies, didnt see that. In this hypothesis, could we go straight to the finals without going through the qualifiers. If so then no |
|
|
|
Post by wrightspies on Sept 1, 2015 14:01:32 GMT
Like I said before. Hypothetically if they changed the rule back. apologies, didnt see that. In this hypothesis, could we go straight to the finals without going through the qualifiers. If so then no I'm going off the old rule. That means we'd need to qualify. Why wouldn't you want to go straight through? |
|
|
|
Post by richardparker on Sept 1, 2015 14:12:33 GMT
Chances of happening anyway?
|
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Sept 1, 2015 14:12:57 GMT
Hypothetically speaking though couldn't we just go straight into the groups?
In that case yes!
|
|
waltersobchak
Lads'n'Dads
F*ck it, Dude. Let's go bowling.
Posts: 64 
|
Post by waltersobchak on Sept 1, 2015 14:22:05 GMT
Hypothetically…if I forced my penis into an angry wasps nest, how swollen would it become before imploding like a neutron star?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 14:27:59 GMT
what a truly bizarre thread
"If the rules were completely different and the situation was completely different to what it all is now, then would we do x?"
sod this, i'm going to start a "If Stoke could enter the World Cup and were allowed to field 20 players instead of 11, but it would mean all the fans having to sleep with Katie Hopkins first, then do you think we all would?" thread
|
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Sept 1, 2015 14:28:33 GMT
Hypothetically…if I forced my penis into an angry wasps nest, how swollen would it become before imploding like a neutron star? European or British Wasps? |
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Sept 1, 2015 14:29:28 GMT
what a truly bizarre thread "If the rules were completely different and the situation was completely different to what it all is now, then would we do x?" sod this, i'm going to start a "If Stoke could enter the World Cup and were allowed to field 20 players instead of 11, but it would mean all the fans having to sleep with Katie Hopkins first, then do you think we all would?" thread Fucking stupid question, of course it's a no. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 14:31:08 GMT
Hypothetically…if I forced my penis into an angry wasps nest, how swollen would it become before imploding like a neutron star? European or British Wasps? laden or unladen?  |
|
|
|
Post by marwood on Sept 1, 2015 14:34:15 GMT
apologies, didnt see that. In this hypothesis, could we go straight to the finals without going through the qualifiers. If so then no I'm going off the old rule. That means we'd need to qualify. Why wouldn't you want to go straight through? ok, apologies, i see your point. In this scenario, if we could go through straight to final himself without playing qualifiers = Yes If we had to play on Thurday =nO (although not sure how to avoid him) If we had to qualify = No If we (in this scenario) can loan players from Championship (ie Ryan Shotton, John Brayford) just to play in the Europa then Yes (not sure this would be allowed) if it was guaranteed to be on TV (Channel 5?) = possibly but not sure I think they have changed the rules on the FA Cup final rule though |
|
|
|
Post by samba :) on Sept 1, 2015 14:42:56 GMT
lost then had to play the winning team on the last game of the season who needed a win to get into Europe. We were mathematically safe. Would we purposely lose to get into Europe ourselves? I don't see west ham or palace in the champions league |
|
|
|
Post by samba :) on Sept 1, 2015 14:43:29 GMT
lost then had to play the winning team on the last game of the season who needed a win to get into Europe. We were mathematically safe. Would we purposely lose to get into Europe ourselves? I don't see west ham or palace in the champions league |
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Sept 1, 2015 14:45:34 GMT
Hypothetically…if I forced my penis into an angry wasps nest, how swollen would it become before imploding like a neutron star? European or British Wasps? What about them big feckin' Japanese hornets?
Seriously though, Viagra is more reliable and it's readily available according to my email inbox.
|
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Sept 1, 2015 14:46:20 GMT
what a truly bizarre thread "If the rules were completely different and the situation was completely different to what it all is now, then would we do x?" sod this, i'm going to start a "If Stoke could enter the World Cup and were allowed to field 20 players instead of 11, but it would mean all the fans having to sleep with Katie Hopkins first, then do you think we all would?" thread Whose Katie Hopkins and can she play the mama role? |
|
|
|
Post by marwood on Sept 1, 2015 14:48:23 GMT
what a truly bizarre thread "If the rules were completely different and the situation was completely different to what it all is now, then would we do x?" sod this, i'm going to start a "If Stoke could enter the World Cup and were allowed to field 20 players instead of 11, but it would mean all the fans having to sleep with Katie Hopkins first, then do you think we all would?" thread several things to factor in here NO = in general to most things. All depends on who we hypothetically lose to on last day Charlton Athletic = Yes Charlton Athlectic managed by Tony Pulis = no Arsenal managed by anybody (but especially Arsene Wenger or Tony Pulis or Daniel Higginbotham) NO generally i dont advocate losing on purpose to anybody or advocate Hopkins on any level hypothetically speaking  |
|
|
|
Post by Skankmonkey on Sept 1, 2015 14:48:27 GMT
Forgot about that. Ok so hypothetically if they changed the rule back. We could have ham sandwiches.
If we had any ham.
Or any bread. 
|
|
|
|
Post by wrightspies on Sept 1, 2015 15:06:29 GMT
Lol I was only trying to take everyone's mind off the West Brom game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2015 15:27:05 GMT
We won't lose in the final....So shit bin...
|
|
