|
|
Post by knowles on Aug 9, 2015 17:08:26 GMT
Here are mine:
Butland - 7
Johnson - 7
Cameron - 8
Muniesa - 7
Pieters - 6
Whelan - 7
Van Ginkel - 7
Adam - 5
Afellay - 7
Walters - 6
Diouf - 6
Wollscheid - 7
|
|
|
|
Post by alexscfc17 on Aug 9, 2015 17:10:23 GMT
Butland - 6
Johnson - 7
Cameron - 7
Muniesa - 6
Pieters - 6
Whelan - 7
Van Ginkel - 5
Adam - 6
Afellay - 6
Walters - 6
Diouf - 6
Wollscheid - 6
sidwell: 0
|
|
|
|
Post by musik on Aug 9, 2015 17:12:56 GMT
Hellu! Stoke vs Lpool: Butland - 7.5 (high class substitute for Begovic) Peters - 4.5 (naaa...) Cameron - 8 (not bad at all) Muniesa - 10 (MoM, no doubt) Johnson - 7.5 (I only wished he'd passed his man) van Ginkel - 3.5 (who?) Adam - 7.5 (ok today, luckily not injured) Whelan - 8.5 (impressed) Affelay - 8 (MoM first 30 mins, then nout) Walters - 4 (nothing special) Diouf - 2 (sell) Wollscheid - 4 (didn't impress me) Sidwell - 2 (nothing at all) Odemwingie - 1.5 (hopefully just bad luck today) :/ btw, Lpool were the better team (ball possession 68%) and we didn't deserve any points today banana ice cream and hoppa hoppa hule hule later on://musik Read more: oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/246601/players-points-10#ixzz3iL4iJTbL |
|
|
|
Post by StokeAz on Aug 9, 2015 18:06:17 GMT
Hellu! Stoke vs Lpool: Butland - 7.5 (high class substitute for Begovic) Peters - 4.5 (naaa...) Cameron - 8 (not bad at all) Muniesa - 10 (MoM, no doubt) Johnson - 7.5 (I only wished he'd passed his man) van Ginkel - 3.5 (who?) Adam - 7.5 (ok today, luckily not injured) Whelan - 8.5 (impressed) Affelay - 8 (MoM first 30 mins, then nout) Walters - 4 (nothing special) Diouf - 2 (sell) Wollscheid - 4 (didn't impress me) Sidwell - 2 (nothing at all) Odemwingie - 1.5 (hopefully just bad luck today) :/ btw, Lpool were the better team (ball possession 68%) and we didn't deserve any points today banana ice cream and hoppa hoppa hule hule later on://musik Read more: oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/246601/players-points-10#ixzz3iL4iJTbLsell diouf!?? U kidding? He was good today I thought... |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2015 18:08:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by flinteastwood on Aug 9, 2015 18:10:53 GMT
Butland - 7
Johnson - 8
Cameron - 8
Muniesa - 8
Pieters - 6
Whelan - 7
Van Ginkel - 6
Adam - 7
Afellay - 7
Walters - 8
Diouf - 7
|
|
|
|
Post by Sfance on Aug 9, 2015 18:11:07 GMT
Butland - 8
Johnson - 8
Cameron - 8
Muniesa - 8
Pieters - 7
Whelan - 7
Van Ginkel - 6
Adam - 5
Afellay - 6
Walters - 7
Diouf - 7
Wollscheid - 6
|
|
|
|
Post by sage on Aug 9, 2015 18:30:52 GMT
Butland - 7
Johnson - 8
Cameron - 7
Muniesa - 9
Pieters - 5
Whelan - 7
Van Ginkel - 7
Adam - 5
Afellay - 7
Walters - 7
Diouf - 7
Wollscheid - 7
Let's not mention Sidwell...
|
|
|
|
Post by wearestoke80 on Aug 9, 2015 18:33:02 GMT
Butland 7
Johnson 8
Cameron 7
Munesia 8
Pieters 7
Whelan 7
MVG7
Walters 7
Adam 7
Afellay 7
Diouf 7
Wholly 7
|
|
|
|
Post by markfitdt on Aug 9, 2015 18:38:19 GMT
Hellu! Stoke vs Lpool: Butland - 7.5 (high class substitute for Begovic) Peters - 4.5 (naaa...) Cameron - 8 (not bad at all) Muniesa - 10 (MoM, no doubt) Johnson - 7.5 (I only wished he'd passed his man) van Ginkel - 3.5 (who?) Adam - 7.5 (ok today, luckily not injured) Whelan - 8.5 (impressed) Affelay - 8 (MoM first 30 mins, then nout) Walters - 4 (nothing special) Diouf - 2 (sell) Wollscheid - 4 (didn't impress me) Sidwell - 2 (nothing at all) Odemwingie - 1.5 (hopefully just bad luck today) :/ btw, Lpool were the better team (ball possession 68%) and we didn't deserve any points today banana ice cream and hoppa hoppa hule hule later on://musik Read more: oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/246601/players-points-10#ixzz3iL4iJTbLWhere did you get the 68% possession stat from? says 47/53 on the BBC Website. |
|
|
|
Post by drjeffsdiscobarge on Aug 9, 2015 18:40:46 GMT
Johnson mom first half, cameron second half.
Honourable mention for muniesa.
Affelay will be a handful when he settles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bowyer83 on Aug 9, 2015 18:40:56 GMT
Hellu! Stoke vs Lpool: Butland - 7.5 (high class substitute for Begovic) Peters - 4.5 (naaa...) Cameron - 8 (not bad at all) Muniesa - 10 (MoM, no doubt) Johnson - 7.5 (I only wished he'd passed his man) van Ginkel - 3.5 (who?) Adam - 7.5 (ok today, luckily not injured) Whelan - 8.5 (impressed) Affelay - 8 (MoM first 30 mins, then nout) Walters - 4 (nothing special) Diouf - 2 (sell) Wollscheid - 4 (didn't impress me) Sidwell - 2 (nothing at all) Odemwingie - 1.5 (hopefully just bad luck today) :/ btw, Lpool were the better team (ball possession 68%) and we didn't deserve any points today banana ice cream and hoppa hoppa hule hule later on://musik Read more: oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/246601/players-points-10#ixzz3iL4iJTbLWhat did Pieter's do wrong and secondly sell Diouf :/ |
|
|
|
Post by Robo10 on Aug 9, 2015 18:41:47 GMT
Butland - 7
Johnson - 8
Cameron - 8
Muniesa - 8
Pieters - 6
Whelan - 8.5
Van Ginkel - 7
Adam - 7
Afellay - 7
Walters - 7
Diouf - 6
Wollscheid - 7
Sidwell - 5
Odemwinge - 5
Not sure how the OP can mark Charlie amd SJW so low
Thought it a decent enough performance, for a period we were well on top and to losenwas a travesty.
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 9, 2015 18:57:52 GMT
Butland - 7
Johnson - 7
Cameron - 8
Muniesa - 6
Pieters - 6
Whelan - 8 (motm)
Van Ginkel - 7
Adam - 5
Afellay - 6.5
Walters - 6
Diouf - 5 (not entirely his fault)
Wollscheid - 6
Sidwell - 4
Odem - 5
|
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Aug 9, 2015 19:00:40 GMT
Hellu! Stoke vs Lpool: Butland - 7.5 (high class substitute for Begovic) Peters - 4.5 (naaa...) Cameron - 8 (not bad at all) Muniesa - 10 (MoM, no doubt) Johnson - 7.5 (I only wished he'd passed his man) van Ginkel - 3.5 (who?) Adam - 7.5 (ok today, luckily not injured) Whelan - 8.5 (impressed) Affelay - 8 (MoM first 30 mins, then nout) Walters - 4 (nothing special) Diouf - 2 (sell) Wollscheid - 4 (didn't impress me) Sidwell - 2 (nothing at all) Odemwingie - 1.5 (hopefully just bad luck today) :/ btw, Lpool were the better team (ball possession 68%) and we didn't deserve any points today banana ice cream and hoppa hoppa hule hule later on://musik Read more: oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/246601/players-points-10#ixzz3iL4iJTbLSell Diouf? You have to be fucking joking, surely. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2015 19:01:23 GMT
Butland - 8 Johnson - 8 Cameron - 8 Muniesa - 8 Pieters - 7 Whelan - 7 Van Ginkel - 6 Adam - 5 Afellay - 6 Walters - 7 Diouf - 7 Wollscheid - 6 Yes ....pretty fair , but I would have given Van Ginkel 5 |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2015 19:04:20 GMT
Butland - 7 Solid in what he did was unlucky with the goal he did get a hand to it
Johnson - 6 Looked good going forward a little uncertain as to who to pass to at times , but got back when needed
Cameron - 8 Just found his starting position for me , shut out their new star man with great aplom
Muniesa - 7 Battled hard but gave no ground a solid performance
Pieters - 6 looked cool and unfussed till withdrawn
Whelan - 5 Linked the play well and did nothing wrong
Van Ginkel -5 comfortable on the ball just not sharp enough for me (that may come)
Adam - 5 A bit off the boil today , perhaps trying a little too hard to impress.
Afellay - 6 Some nice touches of quality showing class and promiss , will he deliver remains to be seen
Walters - 6 Usual bullish display loads of energy lacking a party trick.
Diouf - 7 Ran his bag off today and took a lot of hard knocks from their players who clearly targeted him.
Wollscheid - 6 Looked solid and secure no faults against .
|
|
|
|
Post by robstokie on Aug 9, 2015 19:08:36 GMT
Butland 7 - Steady and Composed, no chance with their goal.
Pieters 5 - Not 100% fit tbh.
GCam 8 - Did Well against Benteke.
Muniesa 9 - Excellent first half, but Absolutely superb second half at LB. MOTM.
Johnson 7 - Solid defensively and full of running, but no end product.
Whelan 9 - Didn't give the likes of Henderson, Ibe, Coutinho the chance to thread balls in behind.
Van Ginkel 7 - Grew into the game second half.
Walters 6 - Full of running and closing down, but offered no real threat.
Adam 5 - Got into some good positions, but was ineffective with the ball.
Afellay 7 - Our biggest threat going forward, could be a good signing for us.
Diouf 5 - Wasn't his day, not much service into him.
Wolly 6 - Solid enough without being entirely convincing.
Odem 5 - No real impact to be honest.
Sidwell 4 - Didn't do much, did he?
|
|
|
|
Post by stokecitytalke on Aug 9, 2015 19:43:29 GMT
Butland - 7
Johnson - 8
Cameron - 8
Muniesa - 8
Pieters - 6
Whelan - 8
Van Ginkel - 7
Adam - 6
Afellay - 7
Walters - 7
Diouf - 7
Wollscheid - 7
Sidwell - 5
Odemwinge - 5
|
|
|
|
Post by bojancity on Aug 9, 2015 20:02:03 GMT
Hellu! Stoke vs Lpool: Butland - 7.5 (high class substitute for Begovic) Peters - 4.5 (naaa...) Cameron - 8 (not bad at all) Muniesa - 10 (MoM, no doubt) Johnson - 7.5 (I only wished he'd passed his man) van Ginkel - 3.5 (who?) Adam - 7.5 (ok today, luckily not injured) Whelan - 8.5 (impressed) Affelay - 8 (MoM first 30 mins, then nout) Walters - 4 (nothing special) Diouf - 2 (sell) Wollscheid - 4 (didn't impress me) Sidwell - 2 (nothing at all) Odemwingie - 1.5 (hopefully just bad luck today) :/ btw, Lpool were the better team (ball possession 68%) and we didn't deserve any points today banana ice cream and hoppa hoppa hule hule later on://musik Read more: oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/246601/players-points-10#ixzz3iL4iJTbLHalf of those ratings and comments are very unfair or too generous. Then one of them is just stupid - sell diouf!! You've no idea about him or what he brings to our team if you give him a 2, just silly! |
|
|
|
Post by Gunslinger on Aug 9, 2015 20:05:25 GMT
Butland: 8
Pieters: 6
Cameron: 8
Muniesa: 9
Johnson: 8
Whelan: 8
Van Ginkel: 6
Walters: 6
Adam: 6
Afellay: 7
Diouf: 6
Wolly: 6
Odemwingie: 5
Sidwell: 5
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2015 20:05:57 GMT
I think some folk are getting there knickers in a twist because we lost it. The 2s and 4s etc are a disgrace and what id expect from a 8 year old. On the whole we played well, the back 5 would all get a 9 from me along with whwlan who was my motm. The rest of the team would get a 8 apart from Adam who was a 7.
|
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Aug 9, 2015 20:21:34 GMT
All of em were a solid 8,a real good effort by everyone a x we lost to a Worldy and on another day we should of been 1 up and go on to win 1-0.
When everything settles down and get a star players back we will have a great season.
Unlucky today lads
|
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Aug 9, 2015 20:48:38 GMT
Butland - 7
Johnson - 8
Cameron - 8
Muniesa - 9
Pieters - 6
Whelan - 8
Van Ginkel - 7
Adam - 6
Afellay - 7
Walters - 7
Diouf - 7
Wollscheid - 6
Sidwell: 4
Odemwingie 5
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 9, 2015 23:01:00 GMT
Butland - 7 Solid in what he did was unlucky with the goal he did get a hand to it Johnson - 6 Looked good going forward a little uncertain as to who to pass to at times , but got back when needed Cameron - 8 Just found his starting position for me , shut out their new star man with great aplom Muniesa - 7 Battled hard but gave no ground a solid performance Pieters - 6 looked cool and unfussed till withdrawn Whelan - 5 Linked the play well and did nothing wrong Van Ginkel -5 comfortable on the ball just not sharp enough for me (that may come) Adam - 5 A bit off the boil today , perhaps trying a little too hard to impress. Afellay - 6 Some nice touches of quality showing class and promiss , will he deliver remains to be seen Walters - 6 Usual bullish display loads of energy lacking a party trick. Diouf - 7 Ran his bag off today and took a lot of hard knocks from their players who clearly targeted him. Wollscheid - 6 Looked solid and secure no faults against . 5 for Whelan  he was one of the best players on the pitch, yet Diouf that didn't do a lot gets a 7 hmmm. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 10, 2015 0:46:30 GMT
I was impressed by Diouf today did a lot of running off the ball and took a fair few whacks without too much complaint. Notably clattered early in the first half along with an elbow butty later on it was clear he was targeted.
Whelan as I said did nothing wrong , I suppose everything is in the eye of the beholder but as I said he linked play well but I didn't see any shots from him or great runs at the defence which would have brought him more acclaim from me.
Brendon for instance thinks his team played well and I suppose compared to their last visit they did.
I have to ask you all a tough question given who normally plays there and how much he is loved.
Has G Camm found his best position?
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Aug 10, 2015 0:49:34 GMT
Butland-6
Johnson-6
Cameron-8-MOM
Muni-6
Pieters-6
Whelan-8
Adam-4
Van Ginkel-5- may seem harsh that one but think Hughes screwed him over with the role he gave him.
Walters-4.5
Diouf-6
Afellay-6.5
Wolly-6
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 10, 2015 0:58:54 GMT
I was impressed by Diouf today did a lot of running off the ball and took a fair few whacks without too much complaint. Notably clattered early in the first half along with an elbow butty later on it was clear he was targeted. Whelan as I said did nothing wrong , I suppose everything is in the eye of the beholder but as I said he linked play well but I didn't see any shots from him or great runs at the defence which would have brought him more acclaim from me. Brendon for instance thinks his team played well and I suppose compared to their last visit they did. I have to ask you all a tough question given who normally plays there and how much he is loved. Has G Camm found his best position? I understand he ran a lot but nothing really came of it, regards to Whelan's lack of shots, he's not in the team to score goals or run at the defence, he's the shield to our own defenders and should very rarely be in a position to shoot, but as you say each there own. re Cameron, he makes much more sense in the middle, looked like a footballer today. |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Aug 10, 2015 1:00:30 GMT
I think some folk are getting there knickers in a twist because we lost it. The 2s and 4s etc are a disgrace and what id expect from a 8 year old. On the whole we played well, the back 5 would all get a 9 from me along with whwlan who was my motm. The rest of the team would get a 8 apart from Adam who was a 7. Sidwell did nothing to deserve anything more than a 4. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Aug 10, 2015 1:02:01 GMT
There wasn't much more he could do today was there? Johnson's crossing was shit. Walters' crossing was shit. Afelly's crossing was shit. Pieters and Muniesa didn't attempt one and if they did it was that shite I can't remember it! No bugger played a precise through ball for him. Not sure what he's meant to do? And if you like running, then you're going to mark him up. |
|
he was one of the best players on the pitch, yet Diouf that didn't do a lot gets a 7 hmmm.
