|
Post by partickpotter on May 6, 2015 16:45:55 GMT
A word also for the "leave". A much underestimated "shot"... Possibly on reflection this is more pleasing on the eye than the forward defensive " block " Mind you, you've got to get it right. There is no more ignominious dismissal in cricket than clean bowled without offering a shot. You'll probably appreciate the green hat more in this shot. Any idea who's under it?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2015 16:58:56 GMT
Possibly on reflection this is more pleasing on the eye than the forward defensive " block " Mind you, you've got to get it right. There is no more ignominious dismissal in cricket than clean bowled without offering a shot. You'll probably appreciate the green hat more in this shot. Any idea who's under it? Well we've all done it ! .......Could the offender possibly be Michael Clarke , I wonder ?
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on May 6, 2015 17:03:23 GMT
Mind you, you've got to get it right. There is no more ignominious dismissal in cricket than clean bowled without offering a shot. You'll probably appreciate the green hat more in this shot. Any idea who's under it? Well we've all done it ! .......Could the offender possibly be Michael Clarke , I wonder ? Respect. Michael Clarke being clean bowled by Jimmy Anderson at the MCG in the last tour down under.
|
|
|
Post by ukcstokie on May 6, 2015 17:08:06 GMT
Possibly on reflection this is more pleasing on the eye than the forward defensive " block " Mind you, you've got to get it right. There is no more ignominious dismissal in cricket than clean bowled without offering a shot. You'll probably appreciate the green hat more in this shot. Any idea who's under it? The Mike Gatting special as I call it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2015 17:12:12 GMT
Well we've all done it ! .......Could the offender possibly be Michael Clarke , I wonder ? Respect. Michael Clarke being clean bowled by Jimmy Anderson at the MCG in the last tour down under. Thought so ....he has a particularly low way of shouldering arms , in fact he doesn't actually do that he just stays in the crouch and raises his arms to allow the ball through ...in this case right through !
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2015 17:15:32 GMT
Mind you, you've got to get it right. There is no more ignominious dismissal in cricket than clean bowled without offering a shot. You'll probably appreciate the green hat more in this shot. Any idea who's under it? The Mike Gatting special as I call it. Yes ...Gatt liked to do it against the West Indies ....normally misjudged the line to find himself LBW ....I remember him doing it in each innings in one Test during the eighties ...probably after a big lunch .
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 6, 2015 17:49:51 GMT
Huddy, you're the only poster who - several times - have threatened people with legal action. Now you deliberate misinterpret this. Maybe you'd be more at home in the Blackpool boardroom? Well , he might be safer , because he reported a very serious assault right outside his flat by someone that nearly resulted in a fatality ....the ethnicity of those involved I will not disclose on the grounds of my newly found political correctness ....but you can google it. I did no such thing. Apologise please.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 6, 2015 17:53:48 GMT
Has anyone reported this filth? Huddy, you're the only poster who - several times - have threatened people with legal action. Now you deliberate misinterpret this. Maybe you'd be more at home in the Blackpool boardroom? So when Harry accuses the Islamic faith of being "rife with paedophiles" I'm misinterpreting that am I? Please explain exactly how? I have not "repeatedly" threatened anyone either. Talk about misinterpretation?
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 6, 2015 18:03:28 GMT
Huddy, you're the only poster who - several times - have threatened people with legal action. Now you deliberate misinterpret this. Maybe you'd be more at home in the Blackpool boardroom? So when Harry accuses the Islamic faith of being "rife with paedophiles" I'm misinterpreting that am I? Please explain exactly how? I have not "repeatedly" threatened anyone either. Talk about misinterpretation? How do you accuse a faith ? you could possibly accuse it's followers possibly, considering the revelations surrounding gangs of Muslim men across the country who have groomed, drugged and gang raped white children may well have come to that conclusion as a matter of course Sir.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2015 18:06:23 GMT
Well , he might be safer , because he reported a very serious assault right outside his flat by someone that nearly resulted in a fatality ....the ethnicity of those involved I will not disclose on the grounds of my newly found political correctness ....but you can google it. I did no such thing. Apologise please. Yes you did , that's how I found out . I'm not apologising for something as trivial as that . I didn't call you a racist , like you have said about me . Get stuffed . Mumf
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 6, 2015 18:16:59 GMT
I did no such thing. Apologise please. Yes you did , that's how I found out . I'm not apologising for something as trivial as that . I didn't call you a racist , like you have said about me . Get stuffed . Mumf So I didn't call the police, you said I did. I did not. You are a liar. It's that simple.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 6, 2015 18:18:29 GMT
I did no such thing. Apologise please. Yes you did , that's how I found out . I'm not apologising for something as trivial as that . I didn't call you a racist , like you have said about me . Get stuffed . Mumf He will be crying to admin soon, are you ready for another suspension Mumf , he has stated before that admin are aware of the infiltration of right wing activists on this board, anyone who does not agree with his Trotskyite ideals is apparently a racist , the education system does not know what it is missing I bet the kids had a fucking field day.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 6, 2015 18:19:35 GMT
Yes you did , that's how I found out . I'm not apologising for something as trivial as that . I didn't call you a racist , like you have said about me . Get stuffed . Mumf So I didn't call the police, you said I did. I did not. You are a liar. It's that simple. This is interesting
|
|
|
Post by edgepotter on May 6, 2015 18:21:14 GMT
Huddy, you're the only poster who - several times - have threatened people with legal action. Now you deliberate misinterpret this. Maybe you'd be more at home in the Blackpool boardroom? So when Harry accuses the Islamic faith of being "rife with paedophiles" I'm misinterpreting that am I? Please explain exactly how? I have not "repeatedly" threatened anyone either. Talk about misinterpretation? You didn't misinterpret anything, it's clear as day mate
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2015 18:42:08 GMT
Yes you did , that's how I found out . I'm not apologising for something as trivial as that . I didn't call you a racist , like you have said about me . Get stuffed . Mumf So I didn't call the police, you said I did. I did not. You are a liar. It's that simple. I never said that you reported it to the police . I said that you reported it us on here . You also told us where you lived , so I can prove it . You said that it happened just outside the flats where you lived . You told us that you you lived in the new flats at J£&@)(;:/ BMW, #^>#<#~# So there you go .....pick the bones out of that fucker ...I won't reveal your address , but don't make me out to be a liar , because I'm not .
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on May 6, 2015 18:57:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 6, 2015 19:03:41 GMT
So I didn't call the police, you said I did. I did not. You are a liar. It's that simple. I never said that you reported it to the police . I said that you reported it us on here . You also told us where you lived , so I can prove it . You said that it happened just outside the flats where you lived . You told us that you you lived in the new flats at J£&@)(;:/ BMW, #^>#<#~# So there you go .....pick the bones out of that fucker ...I won't reveal your address , but don't make me out to be a liar , because I'm not . Bless....backtracking now eh? Priceless.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 6, 2015 19:05:38 GMT
Yes you did , that's how I found out . I'm not apologising for something as trivial as that . I didn't call you a racist , like you have said about me . Get stuffed . Mumf He will be crying to admin soon, are you ready for another suspension Mumf , he has stated before that admin are aware of the infiltration of right wing activists on this board, anyone who does not agree with his Trotskyite ideals is apparently a racist , the education system does not know what it is missing I bet the kids had a fucking field day. And the right wing nasty troll reappears. Right on cue.
|
|
|
Post by ukcstokie on May 6, 2015 20:00:23 GMT
Huddy, you're the only poster who - several times - have threatened people with legal action. Now you deliberate misinterpret this. Maybe you'd be more at home in the Blackpool boardroom? So when Harry accuses the Islamic faith of being "rife with paedophiles" I'm misinterpreting that am I? Please explain exactly how? I have not "repeatedly" threatened anyone either. Talk about misinterpretation? Harry said: Agreed. But when you consider the prophet of Islam was a paedophile it's no wonder paedophilia is rife within Islam. Muhammed was a nonce So within context - even if I don't necessarily agree with how he's expressed it, it's not an unreasonable statement, especially given what has happened at Rochdale, Rotherham, etc. You have threatened several people to withdraw comments or they'll face legal action. Anybody who's read your posts over the last few years knows you modus operandi.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on May 6, 2015 20:22:48 GMT
So when Harry accuses the Islamic faith of being "rife with paedophiles" I'm misinterpreting that am I? Please explain exactly how? I have not "repeatedly" threatened anyone either. Talk about misinterpretation? Harry said: Agreed. But when you consider the prophet of Islam was a paedophile it's no wonder paedophilia is rife within Islam. Muhammed was a nonce So within context - even if I don't necessarily agree with how he's expressed it, it's not an unreasonable statement, especially given what has happened at Rochdale, Rotherham, etc. You have threatened several people to withdraw comments or they'll face legal action. Anybody who's read your posts over the last few years knows you modus operandi. Come on...it's not in any kind of context. And I have done nothing of the sort to whatever you determine "several" to be. I'm sure you are aware that libel and racism and homophobia and religious hatred are now illegal on an internet messageboard.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 6, 2015 20:35:16 GMT
He will be crying to admin soon, are you ready for another suspension Mumf , he has stated before that admin are aware of the infiltration of right wing activists on this board, anyone who does not agree with his Trotskyite ideals is apparently a racist , the education system does not know what it is missing I bet the kids had a fucking field day. And the right wing nasty troll reappears. Right on cue. Was I addressing you Sir 8-|simply advising another poster on your previous on this board, so if you don't mind stop harassing me please or I will have to inform admin of your behaviour, by the way since you butted in so rudely I have been a Labour voter all my life.
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on May 6, 2015 20:38:48 GMT
So when Harry accuses the Islamic faith of being "rife with paedophiles" I'm misinterpreting that am I? Please explain exactly how? I have not "repeatedly" threatened anyone either. Talk about misinterpretation? Harry said: Agreed. But when you consider the prophet of Islam was a paedophile it's no wonder paedophilia is rife within Islam. Muhammed was a nonce So within context - even if I don't necessarily agree with how he's expressed it, it's not an unreasonable statement, especially given what has happened at Rochdale, Rotherham, etc. You have threatened several people to withdraw comments or they'll face legal action. Anybody who's read your posts over the last few years knows you modus operandi. It is a shocking thing to say - but I suspect that's why he wrote it. To shock. It's also lacks context - the Catholic church has its own massive paedophile problem. Is thst the fault of Muhammed as well. The recent grooming scandals are far too serious to be treated in such a trite manner. Shameful.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2015 20:44:44 GMT
Is that when Boycs ran out Derek Randall at Trent Bridge? Probably still not welcome in the Nottingham area
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on May 6, 2015 20:51:58 GMT
Harry said: So within context - even if I don't necessarily agree with how he's expressed it, it's not an unreasonable statement, especially given what has happened at Rochdale, Rotherham, etc. You have threatened several people to withdraw comments or they'll face legal action. Anybody who's read your posts over the last few years knows you modus operandi. It is a shocking thing to say - but I suspect that's why he wrote it. To shock. It's also lacks context - the Catholic church has its own massive paedophile problem. Is thst the fault of Muhammed as well. The recent grooming scandals are far too serious to be treated in such a trite manner. Shameful. The Catholic Church needs to put it's house in order and expose these paedophiles, same goes for the recent grooming scandals Islam needs to expose their own paedophiles no more cover up's no more excuses no more authorities covering up including Labour controlled councils, police etc. the people guilty of covering up these depraved perverts should be charged as accessories and given lengthy sentences in general prisons no special segregated wings etc.
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on May 6, 2015 21:07:08 GMT
Is that when Boycs ran out Derek Randall at Trent Bridge? Probably still not welcome in the Nottingham area Sure is. Good spot! Is anyone from Yorkshire welcome in Nottinghamshire? Is anyone from Yorkshire welcome anywhere full stop?
|
|
|
Post by partickpotter on May 6, 2015 21:10:47 GMT
It is a shocking thing to say - but I suspect that's why he wrote it. To shock. It's also lacks context - the Catholic church has its own massive paedophile problem. Is thst the fault of Muhammed as well. The recent grooming scandals are far too serious to be treated in such a trite manner. Shameful. The Catholic Church needs to put it's house in order and expose these paedophiles, same goes for the recent grooming scandals Islam needs to expose their own paedophiles no more cover up's no more excuses no more authorities covering up including Labour controlled councils, police etc. the people guilty of covering up these depraved perverts should be charged as accessories and given lengthy sentences in general prisons no special segregated wings etc. It's truely shocking what has been going on - across all walks of life. And the cover ups and denials make it even worse.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2015 21:11:23 GMT
Bloody Yorkshire man !
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2015 21:14:02 GMT
Is that when Boycs ran out Derek Randall at Trent Bridge? Probably still not welcome in the Nottingham area Remember that well ...1977 , how could anybody manage to run " Arkle " out ?
|
|
|
Post by RichieBarkerOut! on May 6, 2015 21:18:24 GMT
So, back to where this thread started, and what it's meant to be about.... Would Conservative or LimDem senior figures agree to attend and address a segregated Muslim audience in a marginal constituency? The question is aimed at the Lib/Lab/Con people, not UKIP supporters as we already have a good idea on your position, and UKIP would have not got the invitation anyway!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2015 21:26:18 GMT
So, back to where this thread started, and what it's meant to be about.... Would Conservative or LimDem senior figures agree to attend and address a segregated Muslim audience in a marginal constituency? The question is aimed at the Lib/Lab/Con people, not UKIP supporters as we already have a good idea on your position, and UKIP would have not got the invitation anyway! Oh if we must ? ....definitely not in my opinion .
|
|