|
Post by numpty40 on Feb 28, 2015 18:54:12 GMT
Bego - 7
Bards - 6 Wilson - 8 Wolly - 7 Pieters - 6
Walters - 6 Ireland - 6 Whelan - 7 Zonz - 8 Moses - 5
Diouf - 5
Close call for MOM between Zonz and Wilson
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Feb 28, 2015 18:57:57 GMT
Happy with that with Zonz being motm
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Feb 28, 2015 19:00:13 GMT
Diouf 5? Harsh mate. Fed nothing but did some good stuff, held it up better and linked up half decent.
Bego - 6 - nowt to do
Bards - 7 - solid Wilson - 8 - excellent Wolly - 8 - excellent Pieters - 7 - solid. We look so much better when he plays.
Walters - 6 - did some good, some not so good stuff. Ireland - 6 - criminal tackle on him took him out of the game. Whelan - 7 - good game today, dominated Livermore (not hard) Zonz - 8 - excellent, dominated Huddlestone Moses - 6 - inconsistent today
Diouf - 7 - see above
|
|
|
Post by thestokielad on Feb 28, 2015 19:06:22 GMT
Bego - 7 Bardesly - 8 Wilson - 9 Wollschied - 8 Pieters - 9 Whelan - 7 Nzonzi - 9 Walters - 6 Ireland - 6 Moses - 7 Diouf - 6
Crouch - 9 Adam - 8
|
|
|
Post by flinteastwood on Feb 28, 2015 19:09:23 GMT
Bego - 7 Bards - 7 wolly - 7 Wilson - 8 Pieters - 8 Whelan - 7 Nzonzi - 9 Walters - 7 Ireland - 7 Moses - 8 Diouf - 7
Crouch - 8 Adam - 8
|
|
|
Post by timbo1988 on Feb 28, 2015 19:15:45 GMT
Begovic - 7 Bardsley -7 (one of his best games he has had for us though) Wilson - 8 Wollscheid - 6 looked shaky against Aluko but Positionally was good! Pieters - 6 Whelan 7 Nzonzi 8 Moses 6 Walters 6 Diouf 6 Ireland 7
Crouch 7 Adam 7
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Feb 28, 2015 19:26:00 GMT
Bego should either get 10 or about 2. 2 because he had nothing to do or 10 because what he did he did perfectly.
But where does 7 come from?
In reality nobody was less than a 7 if only for effort.
I agree Wilson, Wollschied and N'zonzi were excellent.
|
|
|
Post by wearestoke80 on Feb 28, 2015 19:39:05 GMT
Begovic 8
Bardsley 8 Wholly 9 Motm Wilson 8 Peiters 7
Whelan 8 Nzonzi 8
Walters 8 Ireland 7 Moses 7
Diouf 7
Crouch 10 Adam 9
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Feb 28, 2015 20:05:27 GMT
Bego - 7 Bardesly - 8 Wilson - 9 Wollschied - 8 Pieters - 9 Whelan - 7 Nzonzi - 9 Walters - 6 Ireland - 6 Moses - 7 Diouf - 6 Crouch - 9 Adam - 8 Hull were shit and if we were that good we'd have won 3-0
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Feb 28, 2015 20:37:30 GMT
Bego - 7 Bards - 7 Wilson - 8 Wolly - 8 Pieters - 7 Walters - 6 Ireland - 7 Whelan - 7 Zonz - 8 Moses - 5 Diouf - 7 Crouch - 7 Adam - 7 Gouranga.
|
|
|
Post by Robo10 on Feb 28, 2015 20:52:07 GMT
Bego 7 nothing to do really
Bards 6.5 solid Wooly 8 great game Wilson 8 cracker too Pieters 7.5 performed well
Whelan 7 nothing spectacular but solid Nzonzi 8 class
Walters 7 effort but no real chances Ireland 6.5 looked ineffective, not surprised with half his leg missing Moses 5 worst game for a bit
Diouf 5 poor
Subs Adam 8 made a real difference Crouch 7.5 did his stuff, game crying out for a target man and crosses!
|
|
|
Post by spongebobflathead on Feb 28, 2015 20:57:37 GMT
I personally think the scores are on the high side for such and average performance , same as original poster but knock a point off each !
|
|
|
Post by ayem on Feb 28, 2015 20:58:54 GMT
Bego should either get 10 or about 2. 2 because he had nothing to do or 10 because what he did he did perfectly. But where does 7 come from? In reality nobody was less than a 7 if only for effort. I agree Wilson, Wollschied and N'zonzi were excellent. You can only rate him on his distribution and marshalling of the back line. 7
|
|