|
Post by ukcstokie on Jan 29, 2015 1:11:26 GMT
Several points .... Huddy = He's not all there ....there's something missing. Newspapers .....They all represent yesterday's news. If you want the news as it happens switch on the TV and try the scores of news channels. I don't buy newspapers ....what's the fucking point when you can get minute by minute updates electronically. In ten years time we won't have a newspaper industry. The reporting of all news regardless of which source it's from needs to be tempered with inaccuracies until specific points are confirmed by the relevant police or government authorities. Reading some of the bullshit written on here , it is clear that some of us still live in the dark ages. Some of us still cling to party allegiences when considering the real truths. That episode of my life died many years ago in my case. I don't think it's clever or trendy to start slagging off particular papers or journalists just because they don't sit comfortably with my particular brand of politics . The trick is to consider all salient points and form your own conclusions. Spot on. On many things people look at me as right wing. On lots of things, I'm left wing. That's because I have a brain and form my own thoughts. It's a shame people can't have their own views.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2015 1:15:46 GMT
Several points .... Huddy = He's not all there ....there's something missing. Newspapers .....They all represent yesterday's news. If you want the news as it happens switch on the TV and try the scores of news channels. I don't buy newspapers ....what's the fucking point when you can get minute by minute updates electronically. In ten years time we won't have a newspaper industry. The reporting of all news regardless of which source it's from needs to be tempered with inaccuracies until specific points are confirmed by the relevant police or government authorities. Reading some of the bullshit written on here , it is clear that some of us still live in the dark ages. Some of us still cling to party allegiences when considering the real truths. That episode of my life died many years ago in my case. I don't think it's clever or trendy to start slagging off particular papers or journalists just because they don't sit comfortably with my particular brand of politics . The trick is to consider all salient points and form your own conclusions. Spot on. On many things people look at me as right wing. On lots of things, I'm left wing. That's because I have a brain and form my own thoughts. It's a shame people can't have their own views. Your more centre midfield then ?
|
|
|
Post by kinetic on Jan 29, 2015 7:05:37 GMT
They are not "lefty" papers though. The only true dail paper that is arguably "lefty" is the morning star. My point is the media are quick to call papers left wing but you hardly here any "right wing" accusations do you? Hardly any right wing acusations. You don't hear a one (rofl)This maybe not a paper but its all part the same propaganda machine. Look what they are teaching the kids in social studies at school the EDL and UKIP are on par with Nazis. Un fucking real.
|
|
|
Post by kinetic on Jan 29, 2015 7:19:58 GMT
And so the agenda that does not exist rolls on. Al Jazeera English tells it's news employers the words 'Terrorist''Islamist''jihad' are off-limits. On the same day Turkish officials tell social media sites to ban pictures of the prophet or be taken off line in Turkey facebook has signed up. Whilst they are doing this the Turkish armed forces are attacking Kurds celebrating pushing ISIS out of the city of Kobane. Indian paper Dinamalar receives a letter saying expect the same as Charlie Hebdo. Maybe there is a agenda cant put me finger on it though ? Wow. Good club night that Kinetic, ever do the wrong pop night's at the old Talbot in Stoke? Wasn't good it was the best, Live Love Dance conna go far wrong with that. I can think of a group who should give it a bash. Never went the Talbot was most probs around the time I was consumed with how to score smack not much else mattered. My dislike isn't born out of racism. I know what them nasty cunts get up to seen it.
|
|
|
Post by kbillyh on Jan 29, 2015 9:30:42 GMT
Wow. Good club night that Kinetic, ever do the wrong pop night's at the old Talbot in Stoke? Wasn't good it was the best, Live Love Dance conna go far wrong with that. I can think of a group who should give it a bash. Never went the Talbot was most probs around the time I was consumed with how to score smack not much else mattered. My dislike isn't born out of racism. I know what them nasty cunts get up to seen it. It wasn't wrong pop, the night was called Monkee........memory eh. Good to hear you beat your demons in ditching the smack mate, think you should chill your beans on the old anger front though, all that hate gone will be a massive weight from your shoulders. Live........LOVE........ Dance. Don't forget the middle one.
|
|
|
Post by kinetic on Jan 29, 2015 11:15:41 GMT
Wasn't good it was the best, Live Love Dance conna go far wrong with that. I can think of a group who should give it a bash. Never went the Talbot was most probs around the time I was consumed with how to score smack not much else mattered. My dislike isn't born out of racism. I know what them nasty cunts get up to seen it. It wasn't wrong pop, the night was called Monkee........memory eh. Good to hear you beat your demons in ditching the smack mate, think you should chill your beans on the old anger front though, all that hate gone will be a massive weight from your shoulders. Live........LOVE........ Dance. Don't forget the middle one. Aye I remember Monkee did a few nights at Keele Uni D&B. I don't know about chillin me beans though fella. If you got kids or younger brothers or sisters you should be very worried and I know that's a phrase the Far Right has used for decades. Not about right or left anymore though. I know I keep bringing Rotherham up. Reason been is its the only report that the public has got to see for themselves. There's a massive cover up on industrial scale. The media would have you believe that report was released by Rotherham Council was it bollox. It was leaked by a very brave woman who worked for Rotherham Child Support Agency and was disgusted by what she read. so she leaked it to the Times and thank God they ran the story. This is the powers that be though. After she leaked it to the Times Labour councillor Joyce Thacker tried to have her removed from her post and her name dragged through the mud. I mean how dare she let the public know what has been going on especially after another Rotherham councillor Jahangir Akhtar had told worried parents there was no issue even though the cunt had the report sat on his desk ?? Then we got Ed Milliband with his speech in Sheffield after the report went public. Roughly along the lines of "Labour has failed in a big way in Rotherham we have 4 councillors we are looking into about their failings" Ok great Ed. Anyway you will be glad to know not one councillor has had the sack over a year later they have not been held accountable in anyway at all. What Ed did do though was push central government to set up a inquiry into historical child abuse scandals. Great you might think oh no, It was high profile celebs they wanted. How better to get Rotherham off the news than plaster Jimmy Saville all over it. Now why would he do this ? Is it because in the constituencies these drug/grooming gangs operate local elections are won and lost on a large bloc vote of Pakistani heritage and best not to upset the applecart ? Cause come on power money and influence is more important than 1400 teenage girls life's ruined by these brutes ??? Its a big fuck off mess and the powers that be don't give 2 flying fucks. Still as we speak Police are losing files street grooming is up 35% on last year. Todays news. Have a read what this victim has say about it. Still sees her abusers driving the streets of Rotherham with cars full of underage girls. news.sky.com/story/1416946/rotherham-victim-says-abusers-untouchableRemember we only know about Rotherham because it was leakedThere was a report released at the start of the week about Birmingham is it going get released to the public NO will be the answer to that sweep it under the carpet nothing to see here. Just to add there was an out reach program in Rotherham forget its name now but back in 2002 they told the council they had 1700 documented cases first hand reports of child rape by you know who. What did the council do closed it down that's what.
|
|
|
Post by kbillyh on Jan 29, 2015 12:00:06 GMT
It wasn't wrong pop, the night was called Monkee........memory eh. Good to hear you beat your demons in ditching the smack mate, think you should chill your beans on the old anger front though, all that hate gone will be a massive weight from your shoulders. Live........LOVE........ Dance. Don't forget the middle one. Aye I remember Monkee did a few nights at Keele Uni D&B. I don't know about chillin me beans though fella. If you got kids or younger brothers or sisters you should be very worried and I know that's a phrase the Far Right has used for decades. Not about right or left anymore though. I know I keep bringing Rotherham up. Reason been is its the only report that the public has got to see for themselves. There's a massive cover up on industrial scale. The media would have you believe that report was released by Rotherham Council was it bollox. It was leaked by a very brave woman who worked for Rotherham Child Support Agency and was disgusted by what she read. so she leaked it to the Times and thank God they ran the story. This is the powers that be though. After she leaked it to the Times Labour councillor Joyce Thacker tried to have her removed from her post and her name dragged through the mud. I mean how dare she let the public know what has been going on especially after another Rotherham councillor Jahangir Akhtar had told worried parents there was no issue even though the cunt had the report sat on his desk ?? Then we got Ed Milliband with his speech in Sheffield after the report went public. Roughly along the lines of "Labour has failed in a big way in Rotherham we have 4 councillors we are looking into about their failings" Ok great Ed. Anyway you will be glad to know not one councillor has had the sack over a year later they have not been held accountable in anyway at all. What Ed did do though was push central government to set up a inquiry into historical child abuse scandals. Great you might think oh no, It was high profile celebs they wanted. How better to get Rotherham off the news than plaster Jimmy Saville all over it. Now why would he do this ? Is it because in the constituencies these drug/grooming gangs operate local elections are won and lost on a large bloc vote of Pakistani heritage and best not to upset the applecart ? Cause come on power money and influence is more important than 1400 teenage girls life's ruined by these brutes ??? Its a big fuck off mess and the powers that be don't give 2 flying fucks. Still as we speak Police are losing files street grooming is up 35% on last year. Todays news. Have a read what this victim has say about it. Still sees her abusers driving the streets of Rotherham with cars full of underage girls. news.sky.com/story/1416946/rotherham-victim-says-abusers-untouchableRemember we only know about Rotherham because it was leakedThere was a report released at the start of the week about Birmingham is it going get released to the public NO will be the answer to that sweep it under the carpet nothing to see here. Just to add there was an out reach program in Rotherham forget its name now but back in 2002 they told the council they had 1700 documented cases first hand reports of child rape by you know who. What did the council do closed it down that's what. No i agree to some of what you say and there is no doubt there is a massive cover up. As much as i detest the bloke i remember Nick Griffin in Keighley speaking out on the issue and being ridiculed and threatened with the law. It's an absolute fucking disgrace nothing was done about it. All of the people involved in shutting out this story should be held to account as in my eyes, saying nothing when in a position of authority is to be guilty yourself. I personally think that the celebrity outings that have been going on are being done for a reason but the reason isn't to divert attention from the asian grooming gangs but to divert the attention away from the Peado cunts who are currently in office in Parliament and the House of Lords. The establishment is riddled with them and that's where my anger is directed. These same people use racism as a diversion, they want us all fighting amongst ourselves whilst they carry on as before and as long as we don't unite in our anger to those at the top the machine will keep rolling, with just well timed stories leaked to keep us busy hating those they wish us to. Your anger is understood, just be careful not to hate all Muslims and to jump on them at every chance and every story because that attitude is just mental baggage.
|
|
|
Post by wizzardofdribble on Jan 29, 2015 14:49:00 GMT
It wasn't wrong pop, the night was called Monkee........memory eh. Good to hear you beat your demons in ditching the smack mate, think you should chill your beans on the old anger front though, all that hate gone will be a massive weight from your shoulders. Live........LOVE........ Dance. Don't forget the middle one. Aye I remember Monkee did a few nights at Keele Uni D&B. I don't know about chillin me beans though fella. If you got kids or younger brothers or sisters you should be very worried and I know that's a phrase the Far Right has used for decades. Not about right or left anymore though. I know I keep bringing Rotherham up. Reason been is its the only report that the public has got to see for themselves. There's a massive cover up on industrial scale. The media would have you believe that report was released by Rotherham Council was it bollox. It was leaked by a very brave woman who worked for Rotherham Child Support Agency and was disgusted by what she read. so she leaked it to the Times and thank God they ran the story. This is the powers that be though. After she leaked it to the Times Labour councillor Joyce Thacker tried to have her removed from her post and her name dragged through the mud. I mean how dare she let the public know what has been going on especially after another Rotherham councillor Jahangir Akhtar had told worried parents there was no issue even though the cunt had the report sat on his desk ?? Then we got Ed Milliband with his speech in Sheffield after the report went public. Roughly along the lines of "Labour has failed in a big way in Rotherham we have 4 councillors we are looking into about their failings" Ok great Ed. Anyway you will be glad to know not one councillor has had the sack over a year later they have not been held accountable in anyway at all. What Ed did do though was push central government to set up a inquiry into historical child abuse scandals. Great you might think oh no, It was high profile celebs they wanted. How better to get Rotherham off the news than plaster Jimmy Saville all over it. Now why would he do this ? Is it because in the constituencies these drug/grooming gangs operate local elections are won and lost on a large bloc vote of Pakistani heritage and best not to upset the applecart ? Cause come on power money and influence is more important than 1400 teenage girls life's ruined by these brutes ??? Its a big fuck off mess and the powers that be don't give 2 flying fucks. Still as we speak Police are losing files street grooming is up 35% on last year. Todays news. Have a read what this victim has say about it. Still sees her abusers driving the streets of Rotherham with cars full of underage girls. news.sky.com/story/1416946/rotherham-victim-says-abusers-untouchableRemember we only know about Rotherham because it was leakedThere was a report released at the start of the week about Birmingham is it going get released to the public NO will be the answer to that sweep it under the carpet nothing to see here. Just to add there was an out reach program in Rotherham forget its name now but back in 2002 they told the council they had 1700 documented cases first hand reports of child rape by you know who. What did the council do closed it down that's what. Mate, it's going on all over the country..EVERY major City has the same problem.
|
|
|
Post by kinetic on Jan 29, 2015 20:01:21 GMT
Aye I remember Monkee did a few nights at Keele Uni D&B. I don't know about chillin me beans though fella. If you got kids or younger brothers or sisters you should be very worried and I know that's a phrase the Far Right has used for decades. Not about right or left anymore though. I know I keep bringing Rotherham up. Reason been is its the only report that the public has got to see for themselves. There's a massive cover up on industrial scale. The media would have you believe that report was released by Rotherham Council was it bollox. It was leaked by a very brave woman who worked for Rotherham Child Support Agency and was disgusted by what she read. so she leaked it to the Times and thank God they ran the story. This is the powers that be though. After she leaked it to the Times Labour councillor Joyce Thacker tried to have her removed from her post and her name dragged through the mud. I mean how dare she let the public know what has been going on especially after another Rotherham councillor Jahangir Akhtar had told worried parents there was no issue even though the cunt had the report sat on his desk ?? Then we got Ed Milliband with his speech in Sheffield after the report went public. Roughly along the lines of "Labour has failed in a big way in Rotherham we have 4 councillors we are looking into about their failings" Ok great Ed. Anyway you will be glad to know not one councillor has had the sack over a year later they have not been held accountable in anyway at all. What Ed did do though was push central government to set up a inquiry into historical child abuse scandals. Great you might think oh no, It was high profile celebs they wanted. How better to get Rotherham off the news than plaster Jimmy Saville all over it. Now why would he do this ? Is it because in the constituencies these drug/grooming gangs operate local elections are won and lost on a large bloc vote of Pakistani heritage and best not to upset the applecart ? Cause come on power money and influence is more important than 1400 teenage girls life's ruined by these brutes ??? Its a big fuck off mess and the powers that be don't give 2 flying fucks. Still as we speak Police are losing files street grooming is up 35% on last year. Todays news. Have a read what this victim has say about it. Still sees her abusers driving the streets of Rotherham with cars full of underage girls. news.sky.com/story/1416946/rotherham-victim-says-abusers-untouchableRemember we only know about Rotherham because it was leakedThere was a report released at the start of the week about Birmingham is it going get released to the public NO will be the answer to that sweep it under the carpet nothing to see here. Just to add there was an out reach program in Rotherham forget its name now but back in 2002 they told the council they had 1700 documented cases first hand reports of child rape by you know who. What did the council do closed it down that's what. No i agree to some of what you say and there is no doubt there is a massive cover up. As much as i detest the bloke i remember Nick Griffin in Keighley speaking out on the issue and being ridiculed and threatened with the law. It's an absolute fucking disgrace nothing was done about it. All of the people involved in shutting out this story should be held to account as in my eyes, saying nothing when in a position of authority is to be guilty yourself. I personally think that the celebrity outings that have been going on are being done for a reason but the reason isn't to divert attention from the asian grooming gangs but to divert the attention away from the Peado cunts who are currently in office in Parliament and the House of Lords. The establishment is riddled with them and that's where my anger is directed. These same people use racism as a diversion, they want us all fighting amongst ourselves whilst they carry on as before and as long as we don't unite in our anger to those at the top the machine will keep rolling, with just well timed stories leaked to keep us busy hating those they wish us to. Your anger is understood, just be careful not to hate all Muslims and to jump on them at every chance and every story because that attitude is just mental baggage. It could well be to cover up the wrong doings of the establishment as well. Timed it lovely didn't they. I don't hate all Muslims just Sunni Islam if someone can show me any good points of that death cult I will be all ears. Look at the troubles in the Middle East Israel might have a lot to answer for but the majority of the bloodshed is Sunni fighting Shia.
|
|
|
Post by kinetic on Jan 29, 2015 20:09:05 GMT
Aye I remember Monkee did a few nights at Keele Uni D&B. I don't know about chillin me beans though fella. If you got kids or younger brothers or sisters you should be very worried and I know that's a phrase the Far Right has used for decades. Not about right or left anymore though. I know I keep bringing Rotherham up. Reason been is its the only report that the public has got to see for themselves. There's a massive cover up on industrial scale. The media would have you believe that report was released by Rotherham Council was it bollox. It was leaked by a very brave woman who worked for Rotherham Child Support Agency and was disgusted by what she read. so she leaked it to the Times and thank God they ran the story. This is the powers that be though. After she leaked it to the Times Labour councillor Joyce Thacker tried to have her removed from her post and her name dragged through the mud. I mean how dare she let the public know what has been going on especially after another Rotherham councillor Jahangir Akhtar had told worried parents there was no issue even though the cunt had the report sat on his desk ?? Then we got Ed Milliband with his speech in Sheffield after the report went public. Roughly along the lines of "Labour has failed in a big way in Rotherham we have 4 councillors we are looking into about their failings" Ok great Ed. Anyway you will be glad to know not one councillor has had the sack over a year later they have not been held accountable in anyway at all. What Ed did do though was push central government to set up a inquiry into historical child abuse scandals. Great you might think oh no, It was high profile celebs they wanted. How better to get Rotherham off the news than plaster Jimmy Saville all over it. Now why would he do this ? Is it because in the constituencies these drug/grooming gangs operate local elections are won and lost on a large bloc vote of Pakistani heritage and best not to upset the applecart ? Cause come on power money and influence is more important than 1400 teenage girls life's ruined by these brutes ??? Its a big fuck off mess and the powers that be don't give 2 flying fucks. Still as we speak Police are losing files street grooming is up 35% on last year. Todays news. Have a read what this victim has say about it. Still sees her abusers driving the streets of Rotherham with cars full of underage girls. news.sky.com/story/1416946/rotherham-victim-says-abusers-untouchableRemember we only know about Rotherham because it was leakedThere was a report released at the start of the week about Birmingham is it going get released to the public NO will be the answer to that sweep it under the carpet nothing to see here. Just to add there was an out reach program in Rotherham forget its name now but back in 2002 they told the council they had 1700 documented cases first hand reports of child rape by you know who. What did the council do closed it down that's what. Mate, it's going on all over the country..EVERY major City has the same problem. Oh I know Shag even in are own City its rife. Take a look at this Takeaways and taxi ranks used as basses for child grooming. I wonder who that could be ?? www.stokesentinel.co.uk/23-arrests-street-grooming-girls-preyed-sex/story-16087481-detail/story.htmlI have heard all excuses well its bound to be a higher majority of Pakistani men involved due to the fact they run the night time economy. Ummm so do the Indians not the same problem though. See that Clive Brown they mention in the Sentinel piece he isn't no pimp he's a little mule to do are Pakistani brothers dirty work used score off him back in the day. I know where his skag comes from.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2015 21:13:48 GMT
I can honestly confirm that in the last 50 years there has only been half a dozen instances of 'grooming' down on the marshes ....3 were huskies , 2 were Golden Retrievers and the other was a mongrel.
Very much like Stoke on Trent was before we were all culturally enriched with shit.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2015 13:54:24 GMT
The guardian is no less biased than the mail depending on your point of view. It's easy to slag off daily mail and its readers without thought as kbilly often does Or any other newspaper for that matter .....that fact is it's become the norm to criticise the Mail and its readers on here whatever they may print , it's now an established fact on here that it's a rubbish publication .....largely I suspect due to Patrick Collins's constant criticism of Stoke over the last few years in the Mail on Sunday , I understand why people are annoyed by that I feel the same way , but you have to put things in the correct perspective . The Daily Mail is a rubbish newspaper though, simple as that. Its standards of journalism are appalling, usually barely concealed rants about some section of society (gypos, fat people, immigrants etc) which you're encouraged to despise today or a fatuous health scare or some guff about how Ed Miliband's dad was a traitor! And the Mail Online is purely a collection of salacious stories about celebs which would embarrass your average Daily Star reader. Every newspaper has owners with a particular political agenda, that's established. However, aside from that, you can assess a newspaper's standards of research and accuracy, its focus on meaningless gossip and how much it allows its political bias to interfere with its reporting. I'd say there are four newspapers worth bothering with in this country, The Guardian, The Independent, The Telegraph and The Times, (and perhaps the FT if you're more business and City minded) in no particular order, although The Times is increasingly a rather embarrassing vehicle for Rupert Murdoch simply to advertise his other holdings. In the recent phone hacking and Press Standards enquiry, The Guardian was the only paper to be singled out by Leveson for the consistently high standard of its journalism. Now, if you want you can see that as simply one member of the liberal judiciary favouring his own and some on here no doubt will. But there you go, that was what happened. I suspect most people on here don't like The Guardian simply because they don't agree with its political leanings and it's nothing to do with it's standard of reporting and research. I'd go so far as to say most of the same people have probably never spent a week reading it to even get a good sense of what it's like! But it's mildly left of centre, therefore they hate it!
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Jan 31, 2015 18:30:21 GMT
Several points .... Huddy = He's not all there ....there's something missing. Newspapers .....They all represent yesterday's news. If you want the news as it happens switch on the TV and try the scores of news channels. I don't buy newspapers ....what's the fucking point when you can get minute by minute updates electronically. In ten years time we won't have a newspaper industry. The reporting of all news regardless of which source it's from needs to be tempered with inaccuracies until specific points are confirmed by the relevant police or government authorities. Reading some of the bullshit written on here , it is clear that some of us still live in the dark ages. Some of us still cling to party allegiences when considering the real truths. That episode of my life died many years ago in my case. I don't think it's clever or trendy to start slagging off particular papers or journalists just because they don't sit comfortably with my particular brand of politics . The trick is to consider all salient points and form your own conclusions. Bless you Mumf..your failure to engage in reasonable debate once again brings you to insults and third rate schoolboy humour. We know what you are now....remember?
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Jan 31, 2015 18:31:29 GMT
You don't hear a one (rofl)This maybe not a paper but its all part the same propaganda machine. Look what they are teaching the kids in social studies at school the EDL and UKIP are on par with Nazis. Un fucking real. Pretty accurate summary that..
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2015 18:31:43 GMT
Several points .... Huddy = He's not all there ....there's something missing. Newspapers .....They all represent yesterday's news. If you want the news as it happens switch on the TV and try the scores of news channels. I don't buy newspapers ....what's the fucking point when you can get minute by minute updates electronically. In ten years time we won't have a newspaper industry. The reporting of all news regardless of which source it's from needs to be tempered with inaccuracies until specific points are confirmed by the relevant police or government authorities. Reading some of the bullshit written on here , it is clear that some of us still live in the dark ages. Some of us still cling to party allegiences when considering the real truths. That episode of my life died many years ago in my case. I don't think it's clever or trendy to start slagging off particular papers or journalists just because they don't sit comfortably with my particular brand of politics . The trick is to consider all salient points and form your own conclusions. Bless you Mumf..you're failure to engage in reasonable debate once again brings you to insults and third rate schoolboy humour. We know what you are now....remember? Did evening prayers over run ?
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Jan 31, 2015 18:32:53 GMT
Bless you Mumf..you're failure to engage in reasonable debate once again brings you to insults and third rate schoolboy humour. We know what you are now....remember? Did evening prayers over run ? QED..... and game set and match.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2015 18:36:44 GMT
Make sure you take your sandals off before you get into bed .
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Jan 31, 2015 18:59:21 GMT
Make sure you take your sandals off before you get into bed . Don't think I've ever worn sandals in my life. Piss poor attempt at a WUM there me old mate.
|
|
|
Post by kinetic on Jan 31, 2015 22:01:24 GMT
You don't hear a one (rofl)This maybe not a paper but its all part the same propaganda machine. Look what they are teaching the kids in social studies at school the EDL and UKIP are on par with Nazis. Un fucking real. Pretty accurate summary that.. I suppose if you buy everything the media throws at you then yeah its spot on. Me I think its a bit more complicated than that. Granted there were dick heads at some of them rally's giving it sieg heils. Trouble is for everyone one of them pictures there's one of these. Look at the worry on these lads faces terrified they are
|
|
|
Post by kinetic on Feb 1, 2015 13:43:46 GMT
|
|
|
Post by boothenboy75 on Feb 1, 2015 15:02:26 GMT
You don't hear a one (rofl)This maybe not a paper but its all part the same propaganda machine. Look what they are teaching the kids in social studies at school the EDL and UKIP are on par with Nazis. :D Un fucking real. Pretty accurate summary that.. Actually reading whats said on the screen, I'd say that the people who are most like Hitler, are people who make or like comments such as "pasty faced" about the jews. I'd say their narrow minded racism is far more dangerous than anyone wanting controlled immigration and a country responsible for it's own affairs.
|
|
|
Post by kinetic on Feb 2, 2015 12:57:03 GMT
I see the media were getting all excited about 1% of British Mosques opening their doors to the public for the Visit My Mosque day . Channel 4 News Cathy Newman couldn't wait get the cameras round to her closest local Mosque that had opened up. 1%, shame when she got there she was duly told to fuck off. At least they are trying.
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Feb 12, 2015 15:15:02 GMT
I see that poor Cathy is nothing but a liar.
|
|
|
Post by kinetic on Feb 12, 2015 18:33:22 GMT
I see that poor Cathy is nothing but a liar.Misses the point only 1% of Mosques opened there doors on the big open day ?? Anyway back to Cathy and her lies. Phew now we can all sleep safe in the sound knowledge that Sunni Islam is in fact an all inclusive cult. With its separate prayer rooms and separate entrances and separate dress codes. I might pop down to the Shelton COMMUNITY one to learn a little more on the subject. That is what the Council sold it to the folk of Stoke as when they sold the land for a pound a city centre plot one pound, the community centre haha. In other news I see the worlds muslim community is outraged by the lack of media coverage of the Islamophobic killing of 3 muslims in Chapple Hill USA. A parking dispute is now also Isalamophobic. 35 terrorist attacks in the name of Islam on the same day not the same outrage ? That Chapple Hill case reminds me of Steve Bakin of Stoke on Trent who was beat to death by his muslim neighbours over a building dispute only difference was no one was calling it a racist attack back then. Saying that the media portrayed the dead man the victim as a racist who had it coming. Double standards all day every day.
|
|
|
Post by kinetic on Feb 12, 2015 18:49:36 GMT
I see that poor Cathy is nothing but a liar.Let see what forward thinking Muslim women have say. all day every day. muslimnews.co.uk/newspaper-tag/islamic-centre-soho/Imam refused Muslimah to pray in the mosque Masuma Rahim It is, as a rule, easy to be Muslim in London. Generally, we are free to wear, do and be what we like. Halal food is plentiful and places to pray are not usually difficult to come by. For some years, I have been using the West End Mosque and Islamic Centre in Soho. An odd place, some might say, for a mosque, but it was certainly an asset to the area. Centrally-located and large, it welcomed anyone who wished to use it. I frequently did so, as did a number of my friends. Until recently, that is. For as I wandered in one Saturday afternoon, I was accosted by the Imam, who told me that I was not allowed to pray there. I asked why: he told me that there were no facilities. I pointed out that the mosque had four floors and that, from the absence of shoes in the foyer, it was empty apart from two people, one of whom was the Imam. Again, I was told I couldn’t pray; this time, I was informed that the management had decided that women were no longer allowed to do so and that I had to go to another mosque. Indicating my luggage (I was due to catch a long-distance train within half an hour) I said that sunset was not far off and that I had no time to walk the two-mile round trip to the nearest mosque and back. I promised to pray quickly and to be on my way, but to no avail. I was escorted out and, in consequence, was unable to pray. I was, obviously, furious. I have prayed in offices and hospital; parks and churches. I have never had any difficulty in doing so and, often, people are very accommodating (I have always found churchwardens particularly welcoming). But, in London, in 2014, I can be stopped from using a mosque because of my sex. It is an outrage. But it seems there’s nothing that can be done. The Muslim Council of Britain does not regulate mosques. The National Sharia Council has no power to do so. The mosque in question was not, as far as I can gather, a registered charity, so isn’t contravening charity law. My attempts to contact the management of the centre have been fruitless. There is nothing, it seems, to stop a mosque discriminating against half the population. Quite aside from the theological requirement to pray at an appointed time, there is an issue of equality here. I wouldn’t expect a mosque to deny entry to someone based on their age or nationality so why is it acceptable to discriminate on the basis of sex? Islam came to create equity between men and women; to demonstrate that neither was superior to the other. 1400 years later, we appear to have regressed in quite a spectacular fashion.
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Feb 12, 2015 18:50:44 GMT
Ah I see. Cathy was really important while it was a chance to shame Islam, but now it turns out she is a massive liar she is suddenly irrelevant.
As for the Chapple Hill killings, plenty of people (Both Muslims & non-muslims) are wondering why it is not called a terrorist attack & getting plenty of media coverage. Are they wrong to ask that? If it had been a Muslim killing three innocent white/Christian people do we think it'd be ignored? I'll bet my last quid that you'd be on here making a post about it for a start!
I love how because it's a white man killing some Muslims you've already brushed it off as "just a parking dispute". I suppose you also think that what happened in Paris was just a dispute over a magazine, right? Or let me guess, because they were Muslim it was different.
|
|
|
Post by kinetic on Feb 12, 2015 19:06:23 GMT
Ah I see. Cathy was really important while it was a chance to shame Islam, but now it turns out she is a massive liar she is suddenly irrelevant. As for the Chapple Hill killings, plenty of people (Both Muslims & non-muslims) are wondering why it is not called a terrorist attack & getting plenty of media coverage. Are they wrong to ask that? If it had been a Muslim killing three innocent white/Christian people do we think it'd be ignored? I'll bet my last quid that you'd be on here making a post about it for a start! I love how because it's a white man killing some Muslims you've already brushed it off as "just a parking dispute". I suppose you also think that what happened in Paris was just a dispute over a magazine, right? Or let me guess, because they were Muslim it was different. Oh here he is putting words in peoples mouths. Its not me calling it a parking dispute the Police are. Considering in Paris they were shouting the Prophet has been avenged NO will be the answer. Why don't you concentrate on demanding actual figures of a systematic rape of a non muslim generation by muslims up and down the UK ?? Its funny now a few figures have been released you have gone awfully quiet.
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Feb 12, 2015 19:08:29 GMT
Misses the point only 1% of Mosques opened there doors on the big open day ?? Maybe she should have tried visiting one of those 1% which was open instead of getting mixed up and making a non-story become national news and a chance to bash the muslims. I'm curious about this 1% part as well, I wonder what the actual uptake was of the population visiting? I wonder if it was less than 1%? Would the 1% open be a bad thing then? I'll be honest I didn't go and I didn't even look to see if any were open. I didn't even know it was a thing until Ms Newman got lost.
|
|
|
Post by kbillyh on Feb 12, 2015 19:14:13 GMT
You running for election Kinetic?
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Feb 12, 2015 19:15:12 GMT
Oh here he is putting words in peoples mouths. Its not me calling it a parking dispute the Police are. Considering in Paris they were shouting the Prophet has been avenged NO will be the answer. Why don't you concentrate on demanding actual figures of a systematic rape of a non muslim generation by muslims up and down the UK ?? Its funny now a few figures have been released you have gone awfully quiet. I haven't gone quiet about anything. I never get involved in threads about peados 'cos they disgust me & I can't bring myself to read the stories of what has gone on. Unlike you though I don't think Muslim peados are any worse than white/black/Christian/Athiest/etc... peados. They're all scum.
|
|