|
Post by mcf on Oct 23, 2014 9:41:48 GMT
even Lukey will know this is wank now that he knows there is a mistake there
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 23, 2014 9:57:21 GMT
I see....one word spelled wrong means it's factually incorrect eh? You two really are special
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 23, 2014 10:00:13 GMT
I see....one word spelled wrong means it's factually incorrect eh? You two really are special if you cant trust the spelling can you you cant trust the information?* actually (and that i give two fucks about wether you agree with me) is that it shows you post shit without even reading it correctly, you see somthing anti your view and post it as fast as you can. *scurrily searches websites everywhere for memes spelt right with the same info on
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 23, 2014 10:13:02 GMT
I see....one word spelled wrong means it's factually incorrect eh? You two really are special if you cant trust the spelling can you you cant trust the information?* actually (and that i give two fucks about wether you agree with me) is that it shows you post shit without even reading it correctly, you see somthing anti your view and post it as fast as you can. *scurrily searches websites everywhere for memes spelt right with the same info on I've seen posts of yours with spelling mistakes Al...does that mean you also post shit?
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 23, 2014 10:14:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 23, 2014 10:22:51 GMT
if you cant trust the spelling can you you cant trust the information?* actually (and that i give two fucks about wether you agree with me) is that it shows you post shit without even reading it correctly, you see somthing anti your view and post it as fast as you can. *scurrily searches websites everywhere for memes spelt right with the same info on I've seen posts of yours with spelling mistakes Al...does that mean you also post shit? following your logic of course it doesnt
|
|
|
Post by britsabroad on Oct 23, 2014 10:36:29 GMT
It's ok...you clearly don't and never will understand the basic principles of economics. PS if Gideon is doing such a great job how come you don't live here? The fact that the creator of the article you've posted huddy cannot even spell "global" says it all. I'd assume he was on a wind up if some people on here didn't seem to know him in real life.
|
|
|
Post by britsabroad on Oct 23, 2014 10:38:16 GMT
I see....one word spelled wrong means it's factually incorrect eh? You two really are special The fact that it's complete bollocks is merely a coincidence!
|
|
|
Post by redstriper on Oct 23, 2014 10:46:26 GMT
I see....one word spelled wrong means it's factually incorrect eh? You two really are special If I were posting an article in the media which I wanted people to take seriously I would take the time to spell check it. If someone can't be bothered to do that what makes you think they will actually have researched anything properly in the first place. The problem here is that you will pick up any old internet shit posted by any ill informed ill qualified loon on any site, and use it as a "fact" to boost your arguments. It's comical and one of the reasons why your credibility continues to linger around zero.
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 23, 2014 11:02:44 GMT
I see....one word spelled wrong means it's factually incorrect eh? You two really are special If I were posting an article in the media which I wanted people to take seriously I would take the time to spell check it. If someone can't be bothered to do that what makes you think they will actually have researched anything properly in the first place. The problem here is that you will pick up any old internet shit posted by any ill informed ill qualified loon on any site, and use it as a "fact" to boost your arguments. It's comical and one of the reasons why your credibility continues to linger around zero. zero? it isnt that high
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Oct 23, 2014 12:32:39 GMT
if you cant trust the spelling can you you cant trust the information?* actually (and that i give two fucks about wether you agree with me) is that it shows you post shit without even reading it correctly, you see somthing anti your view and post it as fast as you can. *scurrily searches websites everywhere for memes spelt right with the same info on I've seen posts of yours with spelling mistakes Al...does that mean you also post shit? Posting shit is optional on here, now you tell me
|
|
|
Post by jpm64 on Oct 23, 2014 12:41:46 GMT
I've seen posts of yours with spelling mistakes Al...does that mean you also post shit? Posting shit is optional on here, now you tell me Optional ? It's compulsory in Salop's case isn't it ?
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Oct 23, 2014 12:48:16 GMT
Perhaps you should ask him you seem to be his self appointed spokesman, while we're at it get him to explain to you how the quantity and quality of public services increased by a third it might be just London but I didn't notice my bins being emptied a third better, my roads being emptied a third better, the street lighting being a third better etc etc etc. I said I was done engaging with you, the post you chose to reply to was one in response to mcf, your childish you said this x years ago response kinda proves my point. That sums a lot of it up FYD We could make out as though Lukey was a thick twat hardly worth bothering with on the basis that he once told us PFI added 9% to the debt and what was it he once told you...something like that 'tax receipts didn't affect the debt' .... but constantly digging such errors up would just be childish, pointless, daft etc etc Couldn't agree more, of course by endorsing your comments I've probably engaged in name calling, insults blah de blah. What is particularly childish is that everyone else means literally what they write but pull up the public service improving by a third quote and the argument is then supposedly about services improving.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 23, 2014 18:14:58 GMT
If I were posting an article in the media which I wanted people to take seriously I would take the time to spell check it. If someone can't be bothered to do that what makes you think they will actually have researched anything properly in the first place. The problem here is that you will pick up any old internet shit posted by any ill informed ill qualified loon on any site, and use it as a "fact" to boost your arguments. It's comical and one of the reasons why your credibility continues to linger around zero. zero? it isnt that high Don't think there's any spelling errors in this one and as for ill qualified loons...source here is the ONS. You really must try harder.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 23, 2014 18:16:03 GMT
Posting shit is optional on here, now you tell me Optional ? It's compulsory in Salop's case isn't it ? Yep...along with double speak and tying himself up in knots...
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 23, 2014 18:19:07 GMT
I see....one word spelled wrong means it's factually incorrect eh? You two really are special If I were posting an article in the media which I wanted people to take seriously I would take the time to spell check it. If someone can't be bothered to do that what makes you think they will actually have researched anything properly in the first place. The problem here is that you will pick up any old internet shit posted by any ill informed ill qualified loon on any site, and use it as a "fact" to boost your arguments. It's comical and one of the reasons why your credibility continues to linger around zero. Tell you what...check out the guy's website it's called "another angry voice" Then maybe instead of hurling childish playground insults we might have a proper discussion...although with your record, I doubt it.
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 23, 2014 20:05:17 GMT
Don't think there's any spelling errors in this one and as for ill qualified loons...source here is the ONS. You really must try harder. Why has the debt increased by that much?
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Oct 23, 2014 20:46:02 GMT
Don't think there's any spelling errors in this one and as for ill qualified loons...source here is the ONS. You really must try harder. So must you the Tories inherited a significant and increasing structural deficit due to things like PFI and higher interest rates. The Tories are cutting the structural deficit and you have moaned at every single cut but it will take time doing it at the very gradual rate they are doing. To put it simply you can't pay off the overdraft until you get your current outgoings to be less than incoming so you have money to repay the debt. Still good of you to confirm you and the person who did the picture don't understand the difference between the deficit and debt.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 23, 2014 21:26:18 GMT
Don't think there's any spelling errors in this one and as for ill qualified loons...source here is the ONS. You really must try harder. So must you the Tories inherited a significant and increasing structural deficit due to things like PFI and higher interest rates. The Tories are cutting the structural deficit and you have moaned at every single cut but it will take time doing it at the very gradual rate they are doing. To put it simply you can't pay off the overdraft until you get your current outgoings to be less than incoming so you have money to repay the debt. Still good of you to confirm you and the person who did the picture don't understand the difference between the deficit and debt. Perhaps they'd do it a lot quicker if the money they borrowed went into kickstarting the economy rather than lining banker's pockets and providing lovely tax breaks for the super rich?
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 23, 2014 21:27:47 GMT
Don't think there's any spelling errors in this one and as for ill qualified loons...source here is the ONS. You really must try harder. So must you the Tories inherited a significant and increasing structural deficit due to things like PFI and higher interest rates. The Tories are cutting the structural deficit and you have moaned at every single cut but it will take time doing it at the very gradual rate they are doing. To put it simply you can't pay off the overdraft until you get your current outgoings to be less than incoming so you have money to repay the debt. Still good of you to confirm you and the person who did the picture don't understand the difference between the deficit and debt. falseeconomy.org.uk/cure/what-is-the-deficitHere you go...the difference.
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 23, 2014 21:35:18 GMT
And also the ONS has changed how it calculates debt so added to labours figures are the banks bAilout, Bank of England gilts spending, quantative easing, and the 33bn network rail debt which has to be included in the total. It didn't before hence the lower red figure. But was largely still there
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 23, 2014 21:37:18 GMT
So must you the Tories inherited a significant and increasing structural deficit due to things like PFI and higher interest rates. The Tories are cutting the structural deficit and you have moaned at every single cut but it will take time doing it at the very gradual rate they are doing. To put it simply you can't pay off the overdraft until you get your current outgoings to be less than incoming so you have money to repay the debt. Still good of you to confirm you and the person who did the picture don't understand the difference between the deficit and debt. Perhaps they'd do it a lot quicker if the money they borrowed went into kickstarting the economy rather than lining banker's pockets and providing lovely tax breaks for the super rich? and raising the tax threshold from 6500 to 10000 hence less tax receipts from the majority lower paid
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 23, 2014 22:31:12 GMT
And also the ONS has changed how it calculates debt so added to labours figures are the banks bAilout, Bank of England gilts spending, quanta give easing, and the 33bn network rail debt which has to be included in the total. It didn't before hence the lower red figure. But was largely still there Where would you be without Google eh?
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Oct 23, 2014 22:53:05 GMT
And also the ONS has changed how it calculates debt so added to labours figures are the banks bAilout, Bank of England gilts spending, quanta give easing, and the 33bn network rail debt which has to be included in the total. It didn't before hence the lower red figure. But was largely still there Where would you be without Google eh? Google is great it leads me to sites like the bbc, ons, guardian, telegraph which tell me more of a truth of the debt, borrowing deficit and how it works. More than a biased meme from one angry voice ever will. Why is one angry voice not telling us the reason for the difference? Perhaps it won't make his silly ramblings effective.
|
|
|
Post by britsabroad on Oct 24, 2014 5:07:43 GMT
Don't think there's any spelling errors in this one and as for ill qualified loons...source here is the ONS. You really must try harder. Rubbish like this is a big reason why Britain is in such a bad way, and particularly Stoke, regardless of who you support. The author of that picture clearly hasn't got a clue how public debt works, but he/she is getting their voice heard and the easily led take it as gospel.
|
|
|
Post by Huddysleftfoot on Oct 24, 2014 6:50:11 GMT
Don't think there's any spelling errors in this one and as for ill qualified loons...source here is the ONS. You really must try harder. Rubbish like this is a big reason why Britain is in such a bad way, and particularly Stoke, regardless of who you support. The author of that picture clearly hasn't got a clue how public debt works, but he/she is getting their voice heard and the easily led take it as gospel. Perhaps you could explain it all then?
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Oct 24, 2014 7:46:35 GMT
So must you the Tories inherited a significant and increasing structural deficit due to things like PFI and higher interest rates. The Tories are cutting the structural deficit and you have moaned at every single cut but it will take time doing it at the very gradual rate they are doing. To put it simply you can't pay off the overdraft until you get your current outgoings to be less than incoming so you have money to repay the debt. Still good of you to confirm you and the person who did the picture don't understand the difference between the deficit and debt. Perhaps they'd do it a lot quicker if the money they borrowed went into kickstarting the economy rather than lining banker's pockets and providing lovely tax breaks for the super rich? These tax breaks for the super rich care to say what they were? The top rate tax cut from 50% to 45% at worst was neutral and many analysts say it has bought in more tax. I could mention all the deals to collect tax from uk people in tax havens pretty sure that's not the old dear next door and will in fact be the rich and super rich. We can go over the banking bailout again a significant part of it due to the government mishandling Northern Rock. Ask yourself this Northern Rock based in the Labour heartland of the North East was “saved” Woolworths was left to goto the wall, what was the reason for this rather than selling to Lloyds or Virgin and possibly avoiding the runs on other banks couldn't possibly be votes.
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Oct 24, 2014 8:16:50 GMT
Huddy just needs to answer the question about what the alternative is.
He hates the Tories and no love for Labour so what they are offering don't seem to be options.
To be honest, this one angry voice is typical Huddy and Lukey territory. Jumping up and down on a 'technicality'.
He's not paying off the debts yet but they don't want him too. They both wanted them to carry on borrowing and borrowing and not cut too quickly....which is exactly what he's done. It's a slower rate than what Darling said he would...not as though he would have stuck to his plans either.
If anyone should be upset, it should be the likes of myself who wanted this done a lot quicker.
|
|
|
Post by britsabroad on Oct 24, 2014 8:35:20 GMT
Rubbish like this is a big reason why Britain is in such a bad way, and particularly Stoke, regardless of who you support. The author of that picture clearly hasn't got a clue how public debt works, but he/she is getting their voice heard and the easily led take it as gospel. Perhaps you could explain it all then? I already did. You didnt understand it.
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Oct 24, 2014 11:35:05 GMT
Perhaps you could explain it all then? I already did. You didnt understand it. if huddy does respond to you, ask him how his 'soak the rich' tactics are going down in socialist France. if huddy thinks osborne is doing shit then god help them - EU wants 1.7 bn off us and then hand most of it too socialist france. mmmm
|
|