|
|
Post by Gods on Aug 19, 2014 21:45:04 GMT
Seems like they are keeping Remy too.
Must admit I was hoping they would fall flat on their arses but they seem to be throwing the kitchen sink at this campaign.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kjones9 on Aug 19, 2014 21:47:45 GMT
They did last time, also so did Norwich last season.
|
|
brudda
Academy Starlet
Posts: 180
|
Post by brudda on Aug 19, 2014 21:50:44 GMT
They can afford it charging fans 45 quid a piece!
|
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on Aug 19, 2014 22:00:02 GMT
Hope they go fucking bump.
Wankers all of em.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2014 22:03:13 GMT
Great signing sadly
|
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Aug 19, 2014 22:04:57 GMT
Was he that great at Norwich? Either way they shouldn't even be allowed in the PL after cheating last season and avoiding paying a fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by nott1 on Aug 19, 2014 22:07:21 GMT
They can afford it charging fans 45 quid a piece! They only got about 17k attendance last game though! |
|
|
|
Post by unknown182 on Aug 19, 2014 22:17:07 GMT
Hardly did anything at Norwich. Remy's goals will be the difference between staying up or not.
|
|
|
|
Post by malteser68 on Aug 19, 2014 23:37:55 GMT
They can afford it charging fans 45 quid a piece! They only got about 17k attendance last game though! and yet somehow they do kit fall foul of FFP rules whereas whenever we are linked to a player of repute done on this board say we cannot sign him due to FFP. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2014 0:44:19 GMT
Hope they go fucking bump. Wankers all of em. Funny you say that, because we had a vote on who is the top Stoke Wanker, and YOU won it...Small world eh |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2014 0:46:21 GMT
Should just add, Hughes came second.
|
|
|
|
Post by 2004 on Aug 20, 2014 6:33:33 GMT
Should just add, Hughes came second. Bit bitter are we? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2014 6:35:31 GMT
Should just add, Hughes came second. Where did Redknapp come, after taking you down? |
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on Aug 20, 2014 8:01:51 GMT
Hope they go fucking bump. Wankers all of em. Funny you say that, because we had a vote on who is the top Stoke Wanker, and YOU won it...Small world eh Ooo get you. What happened, did someone steal your rock that you crawled under last season? Ironically we did the same poll here too and you ALL won. But you got a special mention. |
|
|
|
Post by santy on Aug 20, 2014 8:34:21 GMT
Didn't Redknapp say he almost retired when he realised even he couldn't bankrupt them?
Also on the FFP front, its sort of like a blank slate for QPR where the premier league are concerned - they would have to be more mindful of FFP next season were they to stay up. We're already in the position where the rules state we can only add around £4m per season to our wage bill - unless we announce profits for the previous season.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2014 9:23:36 GMT
Didn't Redknapp say he almost retired when he realised even he couldn't bankrupt them? Also on the FFP front, its sort of like a blank slate for QPR where the premier league are concerned - they would have to be more mindful of FFP next season were they to stay up. We're already in the position where the rules state we can only add around £4m per season to our wage bill - unless we announce profits for the previous season. What happens if we announce profits? |
|
|
|
Post by santy on Aug 20, 2014 9:48:57 GMT
If you announce profits then it is the £4m + profits from commercial deals. At the end of this year the first round of breaches will be flagged up - if any, and the first option in sanctions is points deductions. Coming up to December 2016 that is more likely to pose issues for QPR as well, as the max loss across the 3 years is £105m (with cash from the board propping the club up).
The sanctions list is quite severe in the premier league compared to the UEFA sanctions. It says it starts with a points deduction, and then moves on to things such as the premier league taking control of the clubs transfers to balance the books.
|
|
