|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Jul 29, 2014 12:53:36 GMT
In their review of Premier League clubs' spending this summer we are down as having spent £4.2 million NET. That's £4.2 million spent on transfer fees. - I don't think so! And £0 received for players sold. - Obviously players sold to Burnley don't count!  Pure fiction |
|
|
|
Post by miltonstokie on Jul 29, 2014 12:56:25 GMT
Scandalous
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jul 29, 2014 12:59:21 GMT
I've seen a few websites that have reported the Bojan fee in the millions one a specific transfer spending website
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Jul 29, 2014 13:03:50 GMT
I've seen a few websites that have reported the Bojan fee in the millions one a specific transfer spending website I think most sites gave it as £3 million to start with, but Bowen gave an interview the day after we signed him saying that the transfer fee was less than £1 million. Obviously there was also a signing on fee - but that's true of most transfers in the Prem. |
|
|
|
Post by johnsmithsupper on Jul 29, 2014 13:04:37 GMT
I've seen a few websites that have reported the Bojan fee in the millions one a specific transfer spending website Love the pic btw even you have to admit now hes the best CEO we've ever had |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jul 29, 2014 13:16:16 GMT
I've seen a few websites that have reported the Bojan fee in the millions one a specific transfer spending website Love the pic btw even you have to admit now hes the best CEO we've ever had Level with Jez Moxey. |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jul 29, 2014 13:18:37 GMT
I've seen a few websites that have reported the Bojan fee in the millions one a specific transfer spending website I think most sites gave it as £3 million to start with, but Bowen gave an interview the day after we signed him saying that the transfer fee was less than £1 million. Obviously there was also a signing on fee - but that's true of most transfers in the Prem. I just think there is a certain element of guesswork involved even in the 90 Bizillion quid Tone was supposed to have spent I don't think we ever paid Spurs the full reported price for Palacios and Crouch did we. |
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Jul 29, 2014 13:19:50 GMT
jesus Lakeland, don't send me to that site again, I couldn't get out of there for all the ads firing up without rebooting my laptop!
|
|
|
|
Post by kevan45 on Jul 29, 2014 13:22:48 GMT
jesus Lakeland, don't send me to that site again, I couldn't get out of there for all the ads firing up without rebooting my laptop! Can't be worse than The Sentinel (thisisstaffordshire) website surely?!? Whoever re-designed that wants shooting! (If I'm being polite  |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Jul 29, 2014 13:27:39 GMT
Devastating.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Jul 29, 2014 13:30:32 GMT
jesus Lakeland, don't send me to that site again, I couldn't get out of there for all the ads firing up without rebooting my laptop! Can't be worse than The Sentinel (thisisstaffordshire) website surely?!? Whoever re-designed that wants shooting! (If I'm being polite Probably not but the school of hard knocks had already taught me NEVER to visit a Sentinel link even if it read 'Messi signs'  |
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Jul 29, 2014 15:18:35 GMT
I thought we'd sold Kightly?
|
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Jul 29, 2014 15:36:32 GMT
They aren't called Talkshite for nothing.
I'm still at a loss why any fucker listens to the pile of horseshite!
H
|
|
|
|
Post by cheeesfreeex on Jul 29, 2014 15:49:23 GMT
Talksport is ok if you're selective.
I can't do with Micky Quinn, Colin Murray, Adrian Durham, Sam Delaney, Mark Saggers nor Bobby Gould.
But The Transfer Tavern, The Press Pass, Fishermen's Blues, Alan Brazil, Stan Collymore and johnny Vaughn are great.
Each to their own, knocks spots off the preachy and condescending 5Live.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Jul 29, 2014 15:50:42 GMT
I thought we'd sold Kightly? Yes, that's why I said that the TalkSport figure for Stoke Sales obviously does not contain sales to Burnley!  |
|
|
|
Post by RipRoaringPotter on Jul 29, 2014 22:46:39 GMT
I've seen a few websites that have reported the Bojan fee in the millions one a specific transfer spending website I think most sites gave it as £3 million to start with, but Bowen gave an interview the day after we signed him saying that the transfer fee was less than £1 million. Obviously there was also a signing on fee - but that's true of most transfers in the Prem. As much Talksport spout a load of shite, Bowen could also be talking shit on the fee. It's in his and the clubs interest to reduce the price on him, as less money equals less expectation. It's an absolute wildcard transfer and the fee could be anywhere between 500k and 5m. Due to the lack of transparency in football, I imagine no-one apart from the inner ring of the club has any clue what the fee is. |
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Jul 30, 2014 11:54:21 GMT
Talksport interview.
"Are you any good talking on the radio"?
"Do you know much about sport"?
"Do you dislike Stoke"? B
Interviewee.
"No"
"No"
"Yes"
Talksport.
"Good,can you start on Monday"?
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Jul 30, 2014 12:05:13 GMT
Talksport interview. "Are you any could talking on the radio"?"Do you know much about sport"? "Do you dislike Stoke"? Interviewee. "No" "No" "Yes" Talksport. "Good,can you start on Monday"? You should apply for a job |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jul 30, 2014 21:06:10 GMT
I think most sites gave it as £3 million to start with, but Bowen gave an interview the day after we signed him saying that the transfer fee was less than £1 million. Obviously there was also a signing on fee - but that's true of most transfers in the Prem. I just think there is a certain element of guesswork involved even in the 90 Bizillion quid Tone was supposed to have spent I don't think we ever paid Spurs the full reported price for Palacios and Crouch did we. I think if you use fees that are generally accepted on here then you won't go far wrong. Like this Bojan one we've seen the story develop and know it's less than a million, they (these websites) won't give a shit. |
|
|
|
Post by minnierover on Jul 30, 2014 21:58:29 GMT
In their review of Premier League clubs' spending this summer we are down as having spent £4.2 million NET. That's £4.2 million spent on transfer fees. - I don't think so! And £0 received for players sold. - Obviously players sold to Burnley don't count! Pure fictionThink you'll find that's probably about right actually. |
|
|
|
Post by cmc89 on Jul 30, 2014 22:04:07 GMT
In their review of Premier League clubs' spending this summer we are down as having spent £4.2 million NET. That's £4.2 million spent on transfer fees. - I don't think so! And £0 received for players sold. - Obviously players sold to Burnley don't count! Pure fictionThink you'll find that's probably about right actually. What? we GAVE burnley a free winger? |
|
