|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Apr 7, 2014 10:31:13 GMT
I most certainly am as I did at the time. On reflection he wasted a lot of the clubs money do you agree ?. Of course he did but he also made some very good signings as every other football managers do. Some you win some you lose.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Apr 7, 2014 10:32:01 GMT
This thread isn't a here we go again though is it...it is simply sticking up for one of our players...albeit one on loan. Is it ! or are you trying to justify the fact that Pulis bought CJ to Stoke for an over inflated price, Hughes obviously did not rate him.
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Apr 7, 2014 10:32:16 GMT
I don't care if he suck's Mr Pulis' cock as long as he get's nowhere near our squad. He will as he is only there on loan! I know. I am kinda hoping that someone/anyone buys him in the summer.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Apr 7, 2014 10:33:08 GMT
On reflection he wasted a lot of the clubs money do you agree ?. Of course he did but he also made some very good signings as every other football managers do. Some you win some you lose. On balance how would you rate good against poor signings in terms of percentages.
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Apr 7, 2014 10:34:59 GMT
Of course he did but he also made some very good signings as every other football managers do. Some you win some you lose. On balance how would you rate good against poor signings in terms of percentages. Not really sure how you can do it that way? Are you talking value for money? If yes I would say 75% good value.
|
|
|
Post by chamberlain on Apr 7, 2014 10:35:15 GMT
This thread isn't a here we go again though is it...it is simply sticking up for one of our players...albeit one on loan. It is though mcf isn't it ,it starts off as a post about Jerome then evolves into a pro /anti Tp argument
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Apr 7, 2014 10:37:59 GMT
On balance how would you rate good against poor signings in terms of percentages. Not really sure how you can do it that way? Are you talking value for money? If yes I would say 75% good value. 75% good value , can I have some of what you are on.
|
|
|
Post by foxysgloves on Apr 7, 2014 10:38:10 GMT
You've lost me. IMO Jerome hasn't covered himself in glory. He slated TP early in the season now he's singing his praises. Kissing ass just as he did with Hughes. It pissed me off when he was here, it pisses me off now. I prefer players who prove their points on the pitch rather than in the press. It's not fucking difficult to work out is it. Pulis will have gone and seen that he would desperately need every player pulling for him. With a lack of options he probably would have put his arm around Jerome and told him that he would get in to the team if he buckled down. Tone will have known that Jerome did nothing wrong other than showing frustration at not playing which is hardly crime of the century. I'd say they are both proving a point on the pitch. Lacking your ability to "work out" what's gone on behind the scenes I'll stick with what I know eg. What Jerome said. Based on that I stick by the suggestion that Cameron Jerome is lacking in consistency. Not fucking difficult.
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Apr 7, 2014 10:39:32 GMT
Not really sure how you can do it that way? Are you talking value for money? If yes I would say 75% good value. 75% good value , can I have some of what you are on. See what I mean about opinions?
|
|
|
Post by lastoftheldk on Apr 7, 2014 10:47:07 GMT
This X1000, lost my job due to an arse kisser recently I never trusted the c**t I know why now. Hope you get fixed up with a new job and also I would say that the arse licker is no good at their job
|
|
|
Post by Bombus on Apr 7, 2014 10:52:48 GMT
It seems like his opinions are about as consistent as his finishing and control. Foxy
|
|
|
Post by scfcno1fan on Apr 7, 2014 10:54:13 GMT
This thread isn't a here we go again though is it...it is simply sticking up for one of our players...albeit one on loan. It is though mcf isn't it ,it starts off as a post about Jerome then evolves into a pro /anti Tp argument MCF in stirring up a debate no-one wants shocker.
|
|
|
Post by agingerstokie on Apr 7, 2014 10:56:37 GMT
I didn't start the thread as an agenda driven thing I was just curious whether people thought his opinion had changed or whether he was just talking Pulis up for a transfer.
|
|
|
Post by Bombus on Apr 7, 2014 10:56:43 GMT
Get rid.
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Apr 7, 2014 11:05:36 GMT
What of, Jerome or this thread.
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Apr 7, 2014 11:10:13 GMT
This is turning out to be a classic Oatie thread with some of the very best (and most open mined) posters contributing to it !
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Apr 7, 2014 11:26:23 GMT
This is turning out to be a classic Oatie thread with some of the very best (and most open mined) posters contributing to it ! I'm out. I am trying not to get drawn into these arguments anymore. Nobody is going to change their thoughts so what is the point?
|
|
|
Post by scfcno1fan on Apr 7, 2014 11:27:49 GMT
This is turning out to be a classic Oatie thread with some of the very best (and most open mined) posters contributing to it ! I'm out. I am trying not to get drawn into these arguments anymore. Nobody is going to change their thoughts so what is the point? Precisely. It has been done to death on here. There is really no need to cover old ground on a weekly basis.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2014 11:37:02 GMT
Stoke City: Cameron Jerome criticises Tony Pulis regime Stoke City striker Cameron Jerome has criticised the lack of squad rotation under previous manager Tony Pulis. ...so basically, he was saying that he was pissed off that he wasn't getting a game and was critical about the lack of squad rotation but didn't pass any opinion on TP's overall abilities? Doesn't matter what you say, well not when it's as deeply ingrained into some.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2014 11:41:38 GMT
I most certainly am as I did at the time. On reflection he wasted a lot of the clubs money do you agree ?. £16 million a season just sounded up the wall and nothing to show for it at all. Not even any saleable assets or anything. Absolute fcuking diddly squat did Pulis ever bring into the club, fcuking diddly.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2014 11:44:20 GMT
This is turning out to be a classic Oatie thread with some of the very best (and most open mined) posters contributing to it ! I'm out. I am trying not to get drawn into these arguments anymore. Nobody is going to change their thoughts so what is the point? Don't give up, we must fight for one of our greatest ever managers and beat the wankstains to a pulp.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2014 11:50:03 GMT
Groundhog Day again?
|
|
|
Post by block27row27 on Apr 7, 2014 11:50:12 GMT
He was, and still is a nearly man ( Jerome that is), along with Jones! You know what Nearly did?
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Apr 7, 2014 11:50:49 GMT
Player plays regularly - thinks manager is ace. Player does not play - thinks manager is shit.
Even the most clueless of tools must surely understand that.
And here's another pearl of wisdom - Jerome is utter dog shit.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2014 11:58:28 GMT
Just imagine what you could buy with £4 million. Of all the things I could think of,(and there is probably thousands)Cameron bastard Jerome would be right at the very depths of any wish list I could ever make.
|
|
|
Post by chamberlain on Apr 7, 2014 12:05:27 GMT
And then tazi arrives
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Apr 7, 2014 12:17:39 GMT
On reflection he wasted a lot of the clubs money do you agree ?. £16 million a season just sounded up the wall and nothing to show for it at all. Not even any saleable assets or anything. Absolute fcuking diddly squat did Pulis ever bring into the club, fcuking diddly. Pulis did a lot for this club, however he completely lost the plot after the FA Cup final, he made a lot of very costly mistakes with the majority of the players he bought onto the club, if as you appear to believe that he bought well how come the owners have posted over £30 million in losses ?, would we cover our losses by selling our assets possibly but we would not see much profit, I honestly believe that if had not been sacked he would have put the financial stability of the club in danger in the long term.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2014 12:41:06 GMT
£16 million a season just sounded up the wall and nothing to show for it at all. Not even any saleable assets or anything. Absolute fcuking diddly squat did Pulis ever bring into the club, fcuking diddly. Pulis did a lot for this club, however he completely lost the plot after the FA Cup final, he made a lot of very costly mistakes with the majority of the players he bought onto the club, if as you appear to believe that he bought well how come the owners have posted over £30 million in losses ?, would we cover our losses by selling our assets possibly but we would not see much profit, I honestly believe that if had not been sacked he would have put the financial stability of the club in danger in the long term. He did nothing for this club.
|
|
|
Post by coates on Apr 7, 2014 12:55:18 GMT
Folk still fighting over an ex manager gotta love it.
|
|
|
Post by prem4stoke on Apr 7, 2014 12:59:04 GMT
Folk still fighting over an ex manager gotta love it. It's your fault Coates you hired him
|
|