|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2014 13:07:19 GMT
How convenient that a few days after Sucdacunt comes out and says that the shit actually being shit is bad for the premiershit brand, that mop haired retard gets away with it. The word "intent" is thrown around like a get out of jail free card, but in this case you could actually make a case for a 6+ game ban as Fellaini lost his right to plead intent when he launched several assaults on our captain.
The FA, like my fucking arse. Die you cunts.
|
|
|
Post by roylandstoke on Mar 31, 2014 13:15:43 GMT
Is anyone really surprised?
|
|
|
Post by RichardTMP on Mar 31, 2014 13:18:01 GMT
He elbowed Zabaleta and spat on him, two incidents and he still gets a get out of jail card, doesn't surprise me.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2014 13:22:48 GMT
No surprise there then!
|
|
|
Post by onionman on Mar 31, 2014 13:23:31 GMT
What's the difference between Fellaini's alleged spitting incident and George Boyd's alleged spitting incident?
I await the sanctimonious replies with lots of bolded up letters and the word "intent" underlined many times, with a little picture of a man banging his head against a wall, but I am genuinely interested to know the difference, as I haven't seen the Fellaini one, and thought the Boyd punishment was based purely on an assumption.
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Mar 31, 2014 13:24:07 GMT
FA = Fucking Arsoles.
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Mar 31, 2014 18:33:54 GMT
Our own Malcolm Clarke sits on these panels you might want to ask him.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2014 18:42:28 GMT
Mick mills will be along soon to start talking down to everyone about not knowing the rules of the game
|
|
|
Post by onionman on Mar 31, 2014 19:07:29 GMT
Mick mills will be along soon to start talking down to everyone about not knowing the rules of the game I just don't get some Stokies. Why do you always think there's a conspiracy. Read the rule book. Don't you know what intent means. * That was my impression of Mick Mills Love Child.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2014 19:17:51 GMT
Mick mills will be along soon to start talking down to everyone about not knowing the rules of the game I just don't get some Stokies. Why do you always think there's a conspiracy. Read the rule book. Don't you know what intent means. * That was my impression of Mick Mills Love Child. A decent effort but you need to go on for about 92 paragraphs and be much more boring,condescending and patronising all in one hit
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Mar 31, 2014 19:21:01 GMT
I just don't get some Stokies. Why do you always think there's a conspiracy. Read the rule book. Don't you know what intent means. * That was my impression of Mick Mills Love Child. A decent effort but you need to go on for about 92 paragraphs and be much more boring,condescending and patronising all in one hit I had my run-in with MMLC on this subject but that's unfair. Seriously. He just has a different opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2014 19:32:13 GMT
A decent effort but you need to go on for about 92 paragraphs and be much more boring,condescending and patronising all in one hit I had my run-in with MMLC on this subject but that's unfair. Seriously. He just has a different opinion. Dunna take it so serious mate. Just a light hearted poke at Micks ridiculously long posts and in my opinion he has come across as a bit patronising on this subject in the past.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2014 21:02:11 GMT
The FA, like my fucking arse. Die you cunts. and the stoke-on-trent debating society concludes its point
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Mar 31, 2014 21:05:57 GMT
He was probably trying to get banned to get out of the limelight.
He must wonder what he has to do.
|
|
|
Post by Ryan_Shawjosh on Mar 31, 2014 21:12:55 GMT
He'd probably help the team more if he tried to keep possession.
|
|
Bamford
Youth Player
heeeyy peter hoekstra....
Posts: 478
|
Post by Bamford on Mar 31, 2014 21:16:30 GMT
we were all talking about intent following charlie adams alleged stamp, and at least in that case the contact was made somewhere you naturally put your limb.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 31, 2014 22:02:55 GMT
The FA, like my fucking arse. Die you cunts. and the stoke-on-trent debating society concludes its point I've had a lot of hours to simmer down and I have to say, I regret nothing.
|
|
|
Post by tijuanabrass on Apr 1, 2014 3:05:05 GMT
April Fool?
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Apr 1, 2014 7:35:50 GMT
I had my run-in with MMLC on this subject but that's unfair. Seriously. He just has a different opinion. Dunna take it so serious mate. Just a light hearted poke at Micks ridiculously long posts and in my opinion he has come across as a bit patronising on this subject in the past. Fair enough. I have noticed he's clammed up since Scudamore's comments completely undermined his hard work on the subject. I don';t think there can be much arguing any more that the Premier League and FA view certain clubs differently to others and so take different actions with them. Here's another - Luis Suarez hung a foot out on Hugo Lloris which is far more clearly a foul than Charlie Adam's 'stamp'. But are they going to ban him with retrospective action and so throw the run-in to the season into chaos? Are they fuck.
|
|
|
Post by MuddyWoody on Apr 1, 2014 10:15:12 GMT
THE FA don't give a fuck about the rules of the game, transparent and fair decision making, equal punishment for comparable offences for players from all clubs............ I could go on.
All they care about is the spectacle and maintaining the status quo so they can screw more money out of Sky when contract renegotiation comes around again.
Scudamore effectively said so himself with that utterly ill-advised and daft statement. He may as well have said "We are corrupt to the core, not interested in open competition or fair play and don't give a fuck who knows it"
|
|
|
Post by stokecitytalke on Apr 1, 2014 11:09:50 GMT
Another April Fools joke!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2014 11:31:02 GMT
You think not banning him actually helps Man United?
|
|
|
Post by ihaveadream on Apr 1, 2014 12:30:22 GMT
He should change the spelling of his name back to Felony
|
|
|
Post by Godo on Apr 1, 2014 12:57:44 GMT
But the "intent" was so much more obvious than the Charlie Adam incident.
Add this to the £90 England shirts and the FA statement licking the arse of Nike and you just know football has about 10 years left as a live local event before the clueless qunts in suits destroy it.
|
|