|
|
Post by Stokie77 on Mar 23, 2014 16:59:39 GMT
Been banging on all season how Walters had cost us you look at odenwinge and he is everything Walters is not. He takes his chances and uses his energy in the right areas. We would have won more games with the quality of these sort of players Walters is not good enough and has not been good enough for a long time now. So please mark Hughes leave Walters out in the future it's been a joy to watch without him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2014 17:00:53 GMT
I blame walters
|
|
|
|
Post by fortressbritannia on Mar 23, 2014 17:06:10 GMT
No Charlie Adam as well what's your point?
|
|
|
|
Post by harrysburrow on Mar 23, 2014 17:06:38 GMT
He's a good squad player - he's been first name on the team sheet for a long time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stokie77 on Mar 23, 2014 17:06:55 GMT
Your not wrong Clyde.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stokie77 on Mar 23, 2014 17:09:21 GMT
The point is the strikers playing are much more clinical than the carthorse Walters but if your happy to let Walters back in good luck !
|
|
|
|
Post by andylgr on Mar 23, 2014 17:19:22 GMT
A great performance (so far) and we get another negative Walters thread when he isn't even on the pitch.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2014 17:21:01 GMT
A great performance (so far) and we get another negative Walters thread when he isn't even on the pitch. Agreed. Ridiculous.  |
|
|
|
Post by borat on Mar 23, 2014 17:27:24 GMT
It's no coincidence that we look better when going forward without Walters, I hope and pray he doesn't automatically come back in the team!
|
|
|
|
Post by chaydlestokie on Mar 23, 2014 18:03:57 GMT
make it 7. No fekin way we'd have scored 7 with Walters on. Not a cat in hells chance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimm on Mar 23, 2014 18:04:35 GMT
The front 3 of Arnie - Crouch and Odemwingie can't be changed now
|
|
|
|
Post by trigger on Mar 23, 2014 18:10:29 GMT
Walters basically slows our attacks down.
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Mar 23, 2014 18:11:09 GMT
Been banging on all season how Walters had cost us you look at odenwinge and he is everything Walters is not. He takes his chances and uses his energy in the right areas. We would have won more games with the quality of these sort of players Walters is not good enough and has not been good enough for a long time now. So please mark Hughes leave Walters out in the future it's been a joy to watch without him. No Adam 6 goals.......... |
|
|
|
Post by scfcwebby on Mar 23, 2014 18:11:25 GMT
All Dean Saunders can do on Sky is say how bad Villa were for our goals and giving us no credit whatsoever
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2014 18:12:20 GMT
I think this is pretty conclusive as regards 'our Jonny'
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Mar 23, 2014 18:13:12 GMT
The front 3 of Arnie - Crouch and Odemwingie can't be changed now
I'd just bring back Ireland instead of Palacios next week now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stokie77 on Mar 23, 2014 18:13:39 GMT
Yes make that 7 the thread has nothing to do with Adam anyone that would want Walters back in that set up must be nuts he slows stoke down so much bye bye bye bye bye bye bye(7) Walters.
|
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Mar 23, 2014 18:14:03 GMT
The front 3 of Arnie - Crouch and Odemwingie can't be changed now Agree - bigger headaches for MH is the Adam / Ireland / Palacios selection. Whelan and NZonzi were magnificent again. |
|
|
|
Post by f1rew0rks on Mar 23, 2014 18:15:41 GMT
Walters basically slows our attacks down. same was being said about Zonz a couple of weeks ago! |
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on Mar 23, 2014 18:19:22 GMT
A great performance (so far) and we get another negative Walters thread when he isn't even on the pitch. Negative or a perfectly fair observation? Don't football supporters discuss their team and players on a football message board? |
|
|
|
Post by Stokie77 on Mar 23, 2014 18:19:34 GMT
Yes fair comment about zonz but he has the ability to improve which he has done. Walters has no ability or quality to improve himself or the team and this has been so evident in the last two games without him.
|
|
|
|
Post by andylgr on Mar 23, 2014 18:27:22 GMT
A great performance (so far) and we get another negative Walters thread when he isn't even on the pitch. Negative or a perfectly fair observation? Don't football supporters discuss their team and players on a football message board? No it's just more of the usual - its Walters fault when we lose and its in spite Walters when we win without him. Ultimately what these recent results show is that we have players who have come in this month who want to play and have played well. And that's presented problems (good ones) for the manager. Because what does he do with Ireland, Adam and Walters? It's all good at the moment. |
|
|
|
Post by Stokie77 on Mar 23, 2014 18:28:34 GMT
Easy fuck Walters off !
|
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on Mar 23, 2014 18:33:21 GMT
Negative or a perfectly fair observation? Don't football supporters discuss their team and players on a football message board? No it's just more of the usual - its Walters fault when we lose and its in spite Walters when we win without him. Ultimately what these recent results show is that we have players who have come in this month who want to play and have played well. And that's presented problems (good ones) for the manager. Because what does he do with Ireland, Adam and Walters? It's all good at the moment. Not what I am reading at all. People seem to be discussing the extra threat we have up front as a football team without Walters. It seems to be a point that has a great deal of merit. Better still it is borne out by goals and results. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2014 18:34:18 GMT
A great performance (so far) and we get another negative Walters thread when he isn't even on the pitch. Negative or a perfectly fair observation? Don't football supporters discuss their team and players on a football message board? But how can you attribute a good team performance to somebody by them not actually being there? Was he there when we beat Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal? If there was a pattern emerging maybe...it's inconclusive and therefore unfounded. Isn't it? |
|
|
|
Post by jrstokie on Mar 23, 2014 18:34:18 GMT
There's another thread about Walters because even a blind man can see he isn't good enough. Christ, what more do people need to see to convince them that he is one of the main reasons we've been so toothless up front for years yet he plays because he works hard. Working hard only ever gets you so far
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2014 18:35:38 GMT
Yeah! Fuck off Walters!....  |
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on Mar 23, 2014 18:36:42 GMT
Negative or a perfectly fair observation? Don't football supporters discuss their team and players on a football message board? But how can you attribute a good team performance to somebody by them not actually being there? Was he there when we beat Utd, Chelsea and Arsenal? If there was a pattern emerging maybe...it's inconclusive and therefore unfounded. Isn't it? No one is trying to as far as I can see. They are talking about how we counter far quicker and have more ability to score without Walters. Perhaps you want a different debate ************** but that's the one I see here?  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2014 18:36:53 GMT
The front 3 of Arnie - Crouch and Odemwingie can't be changed now
I'd just bring back Ireland instead of Palacios next week now.
Not Adam? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2014 18:38:02 GMT
The front 3 of Arnie - Crouch and Odemwingie can't be changed now Agree - bigger headaches for MH is the Adam / Ireland / Palacios selection. Whelan and NZonzi were magnificent again. That's a nice headache to have I'd like to see Ireland/Adam back in there against Hull then maybe Palacios against Chelsea. |
|
