|
Post by salopstick on Jan 23, 2014 13:50:23 GMT
Liverpool FC have the best fans in the world
those loveable scouse rogues
in other news a tranmere fan has been arrested over the stabbing of that oldham fan
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Jan 23, 2014 13:55:42 GMT
Liverpool FC have the best fans in the world those loveable scouse rogues in other news a tranmere fan has been arrested over the stabbing of that oldham fan It wasn't their fault. They're the victims!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2014 14:14:36 GMT
Sorry Bayern I don't agree with you at all here. So, as his job puts him in the public eye to those that follow sport, football in the main, that to receive the dogs abuse he has it is somehow to be expected? You seriously can't say that, can you? This story got picked up by the media after Stan retweeted the abuse he had received to name and shame the morons that had sent it. This led to more and more, supposed and alleged Liverpool fans, sending more abuse as Stan had replied to one of the tweets with "You'll Never Walk Alone"... This incensed more fans who felt he was tarring all Liverpool fans with the same brush..which then ironically they too waded in slagging him to the same extent, also on account of being morons. With the show he's on and their and his controversial style then yeah the ability to take abuse would be useful. In an ideal world nobody should be abused but we don't live in an ideal world and it will always happen. But deleting his Twitter and going on what seems like a little breakdown shows to me at least that the abusers have won, that's wrong. I bet they're laughing their tits off. I aren't saying it's right but is it to be expected? Well yeah. It's how he's dealing with it where I have my concerns. He's letting these numbskulls win. how do so many people on this thread seem to be completely missing the point??? Collymore himself has said he has NO problems with getting abuse at all....he said if people want to say he's talking rubbish, he's an idiot (or stronger) then feel free. that ISN'T the issue here at all!!!! it's the fact that the abuse is racist WHICH IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!! taking abuse is not the same as receiving death threats and being RACIALLY abused at all. i (and others) have also explained why he has deleted his twitter account....talksport is a commercial radio station, they promote twitter, twitter depends upon people promoting it publicly to generate more members and therefore increase advertising revenue which is how they make their money. talksport have asked all their presenters to stay off twitter and are refusing to promote it anymore and they can take this stance because being the world's largest sporting radio station then them stopping any promotion of it may actually hit them where it hurts (the bank account). them alone won't do it but if other companies follow then that is the ONLY way to get the message across that it isn't acceptable and someone has to be the first to do it and stand up and be counted. as has been mentioned, Collymore has specifically said it isn't about HIM, it's about the way twitter deal (or not as the case may be) with matters that have an effect on countless thousands of other people out there who are suffering in the same way but don't have the platform of being in the media spotlight to highlight it. i find it staggering that people say the racists have "Won" yet at the same time turn around and slate Collymore for standing up for this.....if you think Collymore (or anyone else for that matter) should just leave it and put up with the abuse then how exactly do you think the racists will lose if we're supposed to just leave it and ignore the matter?
|
|
|
Post by skip on Jan 23, 2014 14:15:32 GMT
He gets paid to stir the shit and court controversy. When it goes against him (and I absolutely don't agree with some of the stuff aimed at him) then he cries like a fucking baby and takes his ball home. In short, he can fuck off. Retweets do not imply agreement.
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Jan 23, 2014 14:19:26 GMT
so amazingly, like a bolt of lightening, they decided to turn their back on it as they've suddenly discovered that twatter is full of abusive cunts at the same time that Collymore has suffered personally.
gee whizz, I had no idea they hid it so well for all these years.
hypocritical, phoney moral outrage....the scourge of modern society
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 23, 2014 14:19:36 GMT
With the show he's on and their and his controversial style then yeah the ability to take abuse would be useful. In an ideal world nobody should be abused but we don't live in an ideal world and it will always happen. But deleting his Twitter and going on what seems like a little breakdown shows to me at least that the abusers have won, that's wrong. I bet they're laughing their tits off. I aren't saying it's right but is it to be expected? Well yeah. It's how he's dealing with it where I have my concerns. He's letting these numbskulls win. how do so many people on this thread seem to be completely missing the point??? Collymore himself has said he has NO problems with getting abuse at all....he said if people want to see he's talking rubbish, he's an idiot (or stornger) then feel free. that ISN'T the issue here at all!!!! it's the fact that the abuse is racist WHICH IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!! taking abuse is not the same as receiving death threats and being RACIALLY abused at all. i (and others) have also explained why he has deleted his twitter account....talksport is a commercial radio station, they promote twitter, twitter depends upon people promoting it publicly to generate more members and therefore increase advertising revenue which is how they make their money. talksport have asked all their presenters to stay off twitter and are refusing to promote it anymore and they can take this stance because being the world's largest sporting radio station then them stopping any promotion of it may actually hit them where it hurts (the bank account). them alone won't do it but if other companies follow then that is the ONLY way to get the message across that it isn't acceptable and someone has to be the first to do it. as has been mentioned, Collymore has specifically said it isn't about HIM, it's about the way twitter deal (or not as the case may be) with matters that have an effect on countless thousands of other people out there who are suffering in the same way but don't have the platform of being in the media spotlight to highlight it. It isn't but like I've said the death threat wouldn't bother me and I can't comment on how racial abuse would bother me but I've been bullied in the past for being a fat bastard and that didn't bother me. Is it similar? I have no idea but that's how I deal with abuse. He's back on. I don't follow him though, I can't be doing with the whole Talksport controversy for controversy's sake bullshit. And it won't hurt them, it's great publicity.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2014 14:22:49 GMT
He gets paid to stir the shit and court controversy. When it goes against him (and I absolutely don't agree with some of the stuff aimed at him) then he cries like a fucking baby and takes his ball home. In short, he can fuck off. so him doing his job that he is paid to do (promote discussion and debate on a sporting phone in radio station) means he is fair game to receive racist abuse, death threats and pictures of black men being lynched and hanged? fuck me, what twisted, fucked up thought pattern does your brain follow exactly? you quite often come up with some ridiculous, archaic and ill-thought out posts mcf which show what a fucking dinosaur you are but this one takes the piss even for you!!!
|
|
|
Post by skip on Jan 23, 2014 14:24:37 GMT
Twitter is no more fully of abusive cunts than anywhere else. People in the public eye attract tens if not hundreds of thousands of followers and amongst those will be some spectacularly thick or mean spirited people. And as it is such a new communication channel, it is difficult to know whether to take it seriously or not, to use it or not or to simply vilify those that use it when you don't use it yourself. But to slag off Twitter, you might as well blame the pavement you're walking on when someone gets smacked in the face by a complete stranger.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2014 14:25:20 GMT
how do so many people on this thread seem to be completely missing the point??? Collymore himself has said he has NO problems with getting abuse at all....he said if people want to see he's talking rubbish, he's an idiot (or stornger) then feel free. that ISN'T the issue here at all!!!! it's the fact that the abuse is racist WHICH IS ILLEGAL!!!!!!!! taking abuse is not the same as receiving death threats and being RACIALLY abused at all. i (and others) have also explained why he has deleted his twitter account....talksport is a commercial radio station, they promote twitter, twitter depends upon people promoting it publicly to generate more members and therefore increase advertising revenue which is how they make their money. talksport have asked all their presenters to stay off twitter and are refusing to promote it anymore and they can take this stance because being the world's largest sporting radio station then them stopping any promotion of it may actually hit them where it hurts (the bank account). them alone won't do it but if other companies follow then that is the ONLY way to get the message across that it isn't acceptable and someone has to be the first to do it. as has been mentioned, Collymore has specifically said it isn't about HIM, it's about the way twitter deal (or not as the case may be) with matters that have an effect on countless thousands of other people out there who are suffering in the same way but don't have the platform of being in the media spotlight to highlight it. It isn't but like I've said the death threat wouldn't bother me and I can't comment on how racial abuse would bother but I've been bullied in the past for being a fat bastard and that didn't bother me. Is it similar? I have no idea but that's how I deal with abuse. He's back on. I don't follow him though, I can't be doing with the whole Talksport controversy for controversy's sake bullshit. And it won't hurt them, it's great publicity. but for all the people like you who just let it slide cos it doesn't bother them there are shitloads of people out there who it DOES effect....they have been a large amount of cases over the last few years alone of people committing suicide due to "Cyber bullying" and we are supposed to just do sod all because "Most people" handle it ok?
|
|
|
Post by skip on Jan 23, 2014 14:27:40 GMT
Cyber bullying/sexism/racism/abuse doesn't affect me so it is not a problem. Solipsism at its finest.
|
|
|
Post by heworksardtho on Jan 23, 2014 14:29:55 GMT
Ulreaka johnson thinks hes ace when he was kickin her head , collymore is a thug
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Jan 23, 2014 14:33:13 GMT
you wouldn't blame the pavement though would you.
..however, you might consider the kind of location you are in, do you have valuables on show, is it dark etc These are all sensible considerations that people take account of in this often fucked up world we live in. It's not right and it's not fair but that is the way it is.
Rather than have police patrolling 'the internet' then I'd suggest they sort out the real world first.
If people can't hack the internet, messageboards or twatter etc then I'd suggest they just get off it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2014 14:34:48 GMT
you wouldn't blame the pavement though would you. ..however, you might consider the kind of location you are in, do you have valuables on show, is it dark etc These are all sensible considerations that people take account of in this often fucked up world we live in. It's not right and it's not fair but that is the way it is. Rather than have police patrolling 'the internet' then I'd suggest they sort out the real world first. If people can't hack the internet, messageboards or twatter etc then I'd suggest they just get off it. why do you even post on a thread that (judging by EVERY post you've made on it so far) you've completely and utterly missed the point of??????
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 23, 2014 14:34:51 GMT
It isn't but like I've said the death threat wouldn't bother me and I can't comment on how racial abuse would bother but I've been bullied in the past for being a fat bastard and that didn't bother me. Is it similar? I have no idea but that's how I deal with abuse. He's back on. I don't follow him though, I can't be doing with the whole Talksport controversy for controversy's sake bullshit. And it won't hurt them, it's great publicity. but for all the people like you who just let it slide cos it doesn't bother them there are shitloads of people out there who it DOES effect....they have been a large amount of cases over the last few years alone of people committing suicide due to "Cyber bullying" and we are supposed to just do sod all because "Most people" handle it ok? It is terrible and things to need to happen (as I've said) I just think Collymore is doing it wrong. What I don't get with the ones involving that anonymous question site where they get abused, is why do they go back for more if it gets to them?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2014 14:39:25 GMT
but for all the people like you who just let it slide cos it doesn't bother them there are shitloads of people out there who it DOES effect....they have been a large amount of cases over the last few years alone of people committing suicide due to "Cyber bullying" and we are supposed to just do sod all because "Most people" handle it ok? It is terrible and things to need to happen (as I've said) I just think Collymore is doing it wrong. What I don't get with the ones involving that anonymous question site where they get abused, is why do they go back for more if it gets to them? i'll be honest with you bayern i have no idea mate...i've often thought why people kill themselves because of months of cyber bullying on one site when they could just not keep going on it if it that's bad but...all people are different and have different issues, problems and viewpoints on how to deal with and handle matters so we (as a society) have a responsibility to ensure that ALL people are protected rather than just the ones that think in the same way we do. whether we understand their reasoning or not (and like you, i don't get it myself) we should still all do what we can to help them..it's the old Pastor Niemoller thing really.... First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me.
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Jan 23, 2014 14:40:50 GMT
I wouldn't say that Collymore is wrong but simply that I wouldn't give him an ounce of sympathy when he is massively part of the problem.
It would be like me going running off to Smudge or Davef because RAF calls me a fat cunt.
Quite rightly they would tell me that I reap what I sow....and probably that losing a few pounds wouldn't hurt either.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2014 14:45:17 GMT
I wouldn't say that Collymore is wrong but simply that I wouldn't give him an ounce of sympathy when he is massively part of the problem. It would be like me going running off to Smudge or Davef because RAF calls me a fat cunt. Quite rightly they would tell me that I reap what I sow....and probably that losing a few pounds wouldn't hurt either. again......so Collymore courting controversy or debate on talksport (which is his fucking job!!!) means people are allowed to RACIALLY abuse him does it??? i don't think they do call you a fat cunt anyway do they... a thick cunt i could believe however
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 23, 2014 14:48:49 GMT
It is terrible and things to need to happen (as I've said) I just think Collymore is doing it wrong. What I don't get with the ones involving that anonymous question site where they get abused, is why do they go back for more if it gets to them? i'll be honest with you bayern i have no idea mate...i've often thought why people kill themselves because of months of cyber bullying on one site when they could just not keep going on it if it that's bad but...all people are different and have different issues, problems and viewpoints on how to deal with and handle matters so we (as a society) have a responsibility to ensure that ALL people are protected rather than just the ones that think in the same way we do. whether we understand their reasoning or not (and like you, i don't get it myself) we should still all do what we can to help them..it's the old Pastor Niemoller thing really.... First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me. We do but we can't all of the time, sometimes people just have to take responsibility themselves and remove themselves from situations where harm can be done. It's why if I was a football manager I'd ban all my players from Twitter, it's a toxic cesspit. Going back to personal responsibility, it's one of the things I think is wrong with this world today, it's always somebody elses fault. And in most cases it is but also more than often in this society we live in, there is an option you as an individual can make to get out of the way or minimise that risk. Because if You don't and God forbid You go on that site and You're feeling like shit anyway, then You might go and do something stupid. And I include the people who are dishing out the abuse in that.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 23, 2014 14:51:11 GMT
I wouldn't say that Collymore is wrong but simply that I wouldn't give him an ounce of sympathy when he is massively part of the problem. It would be like me going running off to Smudge or Davef because RAF calls me a fat cunt. Quite rightly they would tell me that I reap what I sow....and probably that losing a few pounds wouldn't hurt either. again......so Collymore courting controversy or debate on talksport (which is his fucking job!!!) means people are allowed to RACIALLY abuse him does it??? i don't think they do call you a fat cunt anyway do they... a thick fat cunt i could believe however Get it right!
|
|
|
Post by mcf on Jan 23, 2014 14:51:24 GMT
I've not said that. I've clearly said that the racial abuse is wrong.
Collymore and talksport played with fire because they hoped to financially gain from courting controversy.
I listened to the obnoxious prick on Tuesday evening so I am not in the least bit surprised that people react the way they do to him.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2014 14:56:56 GMT
i'll be honest with you bayern i have no idea mate...i've often thought why people kill themselves because of months of cyber bullying on one site when they could just not keep going on it if it that's bad but...all people are different and have different issues, problems and viewpoints on how to deal with and handle matters so we (as a society) have a responsibility to ensure that ALL people are protected rather than just the ones that think in the same way we do. whether we understand their reasoning or not (and like you, i don't get it myself) we should still all do what we can to help them..it's the old Pastor Niemoller thing really.... First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Trade Unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me. We do but we can't all of the time, sometimes people just have to take responsibility themselves and remove themselves from situations where harm can be done. It's why if I was a football manager I'd ban all my players from Twitter, it's a toxic cesspit. Going back to personal responsibility, it's one of the things I think is wrong with this world today, it's always somebody elses fault. And in most cases it is but also more than often in this society we live in, there is an option you as an individual can make to get out of the way or minimise that risk. Because if You don't and God forbid You go on that site and You're feeling like shit anyway, then You might go and do something stupid. And I include the people who are dishing out the abuse in that. the problem though with just removing yourself from harm's way as it were, is that then you ARE letting the racists win. we can't live in a world in the 21st century where we take a stance of "If you don't want to get racially abused then just don't the largest social media platform in the world....if you do then you're just asking for it i'm afraid". **** it's simple really, no-one is asking for the whole of twitter to be policed 24/7 (even Collymore himself said that would be impossible) as they have 9,000 tweets a second globally so it would be physically impossible. all people (and Stan) have asked for is that twitter actually live up to THEIR OWN policies that THEY state themselves, of actually taking action in the timeframe that THEY set themselves. at the moment they have these policies and they're proving to be a complete and utter lie....they haven't responded to complaints, they haven't deactivated accounts due to threatening behaviour, they haven't even responded to request for details from the police in over 6 weeks despite them saying they respond within 24 hours. all they're being asked to do is actually adhere to their own policies and being a company worth over 32 billion dollars they certainly have the resources to be able to implement procedures to be able to cope with what THEY promise the customer **** i appreciate that part relates specfically to the whole Collymore bit.....in terms of the same stance on the sites where people kill themselves etc. i agree about taking themselves out of harm way on those sites. they seem to be bizarre, dark places on the internet and a lot of them the police want to close down because they seem to almost be specifically there for people to get abused and serve no other purpose
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 23, 2014 15:04:36 GMT
We do but we can't all of the time, sometimes people just have to take responsibility themselves and remove themselves from situations where harm can be done. It's why if I was a football manager I'd ban all my players from Twitter, it's a toxic cesspit. Going back to personal responsibility, it's one of the things I think is wrong with this world today, it's always somebody elses fault. And in most cases it is but also more than often in this society we live in, there is an option you as an individual can make to get out of the way or minimise that risk. Because if You don't and God forbid You go on that site and You're feeling like shit anyway, then You might go and do something stupid. And I include the people who are dishing out the abuse in that. the problem though with just removing yourself from harm's way as it were, is that then you ARE letting the racists win. we can't live in a world in the 21st century where we take a stance of "If you don't want to get racially abused then just don't the largest social media platform in the world....if you do then you're just asking for it i'm afraid". it's simple really, no-one is asking for the whole of twitter to be policed 24/7 (even Collymore himself said that would be impossible) as they have 9,000 tweets a second globally so it would be physically impossible. all people (and Stan) have asked for is that twitter actually live up to THEIR OWN policies that THEY state themselves, of actually taking action in the timeframe that THEY set themselves. at the moment they have these policies and they're proving to be a complete and utter lie....they haven't responded to complaints, they haven't deactivated accounts due to threatening behaviour, they haven't even responded to request for details from the police in over 6 weeks despite them saying they respond within 24 hours. all they're being asked to do is actually adhere to their own policies and being a company worth over 32 billion dollars they certainly have the resources to be able to implement procedures to be able to cope with what THEY promise the customer I agree with that and have said that further up. It's another reason why I think Collymore has gone wrong. He should have either let the Police deal with it in their own time (and it would get done eventually) or just not tweeted for months. No I'm leaving Twitter blah blah blah because that will garner more abuse but just disappear from it. Like I said, I think is a cesspool if You're a "celebrity" or someone who thinks they are. And it will never be controlled because it's simply too easy to be a dick on there and judgement goes out of the window. It's not right but it's how it is and I can't see how they'll change. We're nasty to each other, it's what we do and it's what we'll do until we all kill each other. Twitter's (the corporation) reaction is bizarre but drawing attention to it again just garners more abuse. It's a vicious circle that I don't think will be stopped.
|
|
|
Post by thepremierbanksy on Jan 23, 2014 15:33:29 GMT
the problem though with just removing yourself from harm's way as it were, is that then you ARE letting the racists win. we can't live in a world in the 21st century where we take a stance of "If you don't want to get racially abused then just don't the largest social media platform in the world....if you do then you're just asking for it i'm afraid". it's simple really, no-one is asking for the whole of twitter to be policed 24/7 (even Collymore himself said that would be impossible) as they have 9,000 tweets a second globally so it would be physically impossible. all people (and Stan) have asked for is that twitter actually live up to THEIR OWN policies that THEY state themselves, of actually taking action in the timeframe that THEY set themselves. at the moment they have these policies and they're proving to be a complete and utter lie....they haven't responded to complaints, they haven't deactivated accounts due to threatening behaviour, they haven't even responded to request for details from the police in over 6 weeks despite them saying they respond within 24 hours. all they're being asked to do is actually adhere to their own policies and being a company worth over 32 billion dollars they certainly have the resources to be able to implement procedures to be able to cope with what THEY promise the customer I agree with that and have said that further up. It's another reason why I think Collymore has gone wrong. He should have either let the Police deal with it in their own time (and it would get done eventually) or just not tweeted for months. No I'm leaving Twitter blah blah blah because that will garner more abuse but just disappear from it. Like I said, I think is a cesspool if You're a "celebrity" or someone who thinks they are. And it will never be controlled because it's simply too easy to be a dick on there and judgement goes out of the window. It's not right but it's how it is and I can't see how they'll change. We're nasty to each other, it's what we do and it's what we'll do until we all kill each other. Twitter's (the corporation) reaction is bizarre but drawing attention to it again just garners more abuse. It's a vicious circle that I don't think will be stopped. Like I've already told you he's said the police are fully willing to prosecute, the problem here and why he's highlighted the abuse in the public eye is that the police are requesting the details of the people sending the abuse and twitter aren't giving up the information, thus by going public he's trying to create enough negative press to force twitter to pull their fingers out - they don't really have any reason or right not to supply that information to the police. I reckon Collymore has got a pretty thick skin by now and he has been saying that it's not really about the abuse he's getting but that this affects many people. Some woman who was trying to get Jane Austin on the bank note was apparently being tweeted with graphic threats of being gang raped in every orifice - she's hardly provoked that now has she? Think beyond Collymore being a wife-beating shock-jock and toward normal people who work in the media and need twitter to do their jobs. They'll never eliminate abuse on the internet but you can certainly lay a marker down by taking action so that people do not have a sense of complete impunity.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 23, 2014 15:36:50 GMT
I agree with that and have said that further up. It's another reason why I think Collymore has gone wrong. He should have either let the Police deal with it in their own time (and it would get done eventually) or just not tweeted for months. No I'm leaving Twitter blah blah blah because that will garner more abuse but just disappear from it. Like I said, I think is a cesspool if You're a "celebrity" or someone who thinks they are. And it will never be controlled because it's simply too easy to be a dick on there and judgement goes out of the window. It's not right but it's how it is and I can't see how they'll change. We're nasty to each other, it's what we do and it's what we'll do until we all kill each other. Twitter's (the corporation) reaction is bizarre but drawing attention to it again just garners more abuse. It's a vicious circle that I don't think will be stopped. Like I've already told you he's said the police are fully willing to prosecute, the problem here and why he's highlighted the abuse in the public eye is that the police are requesting the details of the people sending the abuse and twitter aren't giving up the information, thus by going public he's trying to create enough negative press to force twitter to pull their fingers out - they don't really have any reason or right not to supply that information to the police. I reckon Collymore has got a pretty thick skin by now and he has been saying that it's not really about the abuse he's getting but that this affects many people. Some woman who was trying to get Jane Austin on the bank note was apparently being tweeted with graphic threats of being gang raped in every orifice - she's hardly provoked that now has she? Think beyond Collymore being a wife-beating shock-jock and toward normal people who work in the media and need twitter to do their jobs. They'll never eliminate abuse on the internet but you can certainly lay a marker down by taking action so that people do not have a sense of complete impunity. I know it's the keeping banging on about I don't get (which is what I've said). Because I don't think Twitter will change much and those who are in the wrong will get their comeuppance anyway. Doing it like this just stirs up the hornets nest even more and escalates things. She hasn't but like I've said, Twitter is a cesspool, if I was anyone of "note" I wouldn't be on there because I wouldn't want to have deal with that shit. It's going to happen by just being on there. It's sad but that's how it is.
|
|
|
Post by efc on Jan 23, 2014 22:08:55 GMT
KopTalk: "many Liverpool supporters are hurt by Collymore's digs at Liverpool" hahaha You just knew they'd end up the injured party in all of this. They have been calling for Lukaku to be banned for not criticising anelka's gesture celebration yet forget they have a player in the ranks (Sakho) who has done the same gesture! they are a cult, foam at the mouths at anyone who doesn't brown nose them whilst playing the inured party in everything they do wrong. Its only through Suarez that the rest of the country are seeing what we have known the decades, they are the millwall with trophies.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 24, 2014 0:09:30 GMT
EFC, You spelt cunt wrong!
|
|
|
Post by seasidestokie on Jan 24, 2014 0:10:57 GMT
He gets paid to stir the shit and court controversy. When it goes against him (and I absolutely don't agree with some of the stuff aimed at him) then he cries like a fucking baby and takes his ball home. In short, he can fuck off. No he can't... But you can!
|
|
|
Post by foster on Jan 24, 2014 9:02:59 GMT
I'm more concerned by the reason behind him getting abuse.
All those wankers who support diving should be fucking shot.
IMO, if you go on twatter then you're asking for trouble. It's absolute dogshit.
|
|
|
Post by skemstokie on Jan 26, 2014 10:07:50 GMT
Brilliant article by Stan Collymore in The People, a man growing in stature with age in my eyes,can't do a link sure someone else can?
|
|
|
Post by outspaced on Jan 26, 2014 10:50:17 GMT
|
|