|
Post by slogger on Jan 18, 2014 10:37:04 GMT
Who here would pay some one to do a job for you for six months .and have the fella turn around saying I can't be arsed do the job but can you still pay me and thinks that's expectable .typical greedy footballer trying force a move or a pay off
|
|
|
Post by cheekymatt71 on Jan 18, 2014 10:37:31 GMT
Was Kitson still at Stoke when we had that offer for Begovic?
|
|
|
Post by stokeramblers on Jan 18, 2014 10:57:44 GMT
Would KJ refuse to play or turn up no. You know this how...
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Jan 18, 2014 10:59:14 GMT
What a complete and utter fantasist Kitson is. If no text exists why doesn't Kenwyne produce his text record to prove it? If no text exists why has he accepted a 2 week fine? If no text exists why, if as it says Stoke want rid, would they make it up knowing that any prospective buyer may be put off by someone so unprofessional as to behave in this way? If no text exists why hasn't Kenwyne or his representative(s) splashed it all over the media? This smacks as a damage limitation exercise by team Jones. IF NO TEXT EXISTS WHY DID HE NOT TURN UP FOR WORK ON SUNDAY? Surely that is the burning question not whether or not a text was sent. In other words why leave it to some cowardly, washed up neverhasbeen, bang average footballer to sneak it onto a backwater website under the cloak of anonymity if what you're saying is the truth. I hope Stoke sue the backside off Kitson, that way we might get some of the money back off him he robbed from us.
|
|
|
Post by DansViews on Jan 18, 2014 11:00:32 GMT
Kenwyne jones was seen in the Trafford centre at 10am on the morning of the game - Absolute bollox by kitson
|
|
|
Post by alster on Jan 18, 2014 11:06:38 GMT
Wasn't the Shrewsbury cup game that TP accused Bego of refusing to play in a mid week game?
And having read the article, how have you all managed to come to the conclusion its Kitson? It could just as likely have been written by some knobhead who hasn't kicked a football since the school playground but somehow by connection or some form of misguided empathy feels keen to defend KJ.
|
|
|
Post by stokeramblers on Jan 18, 2014 11:42:32 GMT
Wasn't the Shrewsbury cup game that TP accused Bego of refusing to play in a mid week game? And having read the article, how have you all managed to come to the conclusion its Kitson? It could just as likely have been written by some knobhead who hasn't kicked a football since the school playground but somehow by connection or some form of misguided empathy feels keen to defend KJ. The rumours about 'TSF' being Kitson have been around for ages to be fair. It's almost universally accepted that it is Kitson.
|
|
|
Post by padders01 on Jan 18, 2014 11:46:04 GMT
If it is Begovic, then wasn't it a midweek cup game he refused to play in?
|
|
|
Post by stokeramblers on Jan 18, 2014 11:52:49 GMT
We know that KJ loves stoke city. im sure he wants a new contract,because he loves stoke and does not want to go else where and earn less money ( who would ). I get it now, you're on a wind up Good one!
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Jan 18, 2014 11:59:01 GMT
I think KJ has to go because we do need a striker who can play up front on his own and get behind defenders. We know that KJ loves stoke city. im sure he wants a new contract,because he loves stoke and does not want to go else where and earn less money ( who would ). I believe the purse strings have been tightened and i dont have an issue with that. The way forward for stoke city is a young attacking team , who have enough quality,but dont demand high wages and who can move stoke city up the table.I think we will find in the summer that we take in home and foreign loans,players out of contract and young quality. That means that by hook or by crook certain players will be expected to find new clubs. we have a good few players out of contract this season and the end of next. we need funds from the sale of these players because of the lack of funds from Peter Coates. I believe KJ did not refuse to play ,I believe his wish is a new contract. stoke city want him out of the door to move on successfully as a club. with no debts.Playing exciting football to bring in supporters. and hopefully a middle of the table team.That what we all want to see,stoke city in the PL,debt free and exciting to watch.should we be slating KJ no. What basis have you got for these beliefs then? PS are you Kenwynes mum?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2014 12:06:38 GMT
Lets get a few things straight.
You were wank as a footballer Kitson, you are wank at covering your secret tracks, wank at writing a book and wank at writing articles.
Lets just call you exactly what you are...
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Jan 18, 2014 12:07:17 GMT
Wasn't the Shrewsbury cup game that TP accused Bego of refusing to play in a mid week game? And having read the article, how have you all managed to come to the conclusion its Kitson? It could just as likely have been written by some knobhead who hasn't kicked a football since the school playground but somehow by connection or some form of misguided empathy feels keen to defend KJ. I'm sure the secret footballer is an amalgam of a number of ex players with an axe to grind but I thought it was widely accepted that Kitson is, if not THE, certainly A, secret footballer. Surely the supposed inside info into the textgate saga and the reference to the goalkeeper story (which bears a striking similarity to Bego's 'not in the right frame of mind to play' scenario) might suggest the mardy twat was involved in this article in some way. It's no greater leap of faith to believe Kitson is TSF than it is to believe his version of textgate is it?
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Jan 18, 2014 12:17:24 GMT
This article gives tou a unique insight into Kitson's personality. Here we can see again that he's a self-entitled prick.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 18, 2014 12:20:40 GMT
Wasn't the Shrewsbury cup game that TP accused Bego of refusing to play in a mid week game? And having read the article, how have you all managed to come to the conclusion its Kitson? It could just as likely have been written by some knobhead who hasn't kicked a football since the school playground but somehow by connection or some form of misguided empathy feels keen to defend KJ.
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on Jan 18, 2014 12:27:17 GMT
What complete rot. Dave Kitson and Kenwyne Jones are 'woe is me' world owes me a living types who are an anathema to supporters. If just for one minute you give the article a moments credence, it seems that Kitson and Jones are more concerned with the mode of communication rather than the refusal to play itself. Dave Kitson and Kenwyne Jones two cunty peas in a very shitty pod. How the fuck did they pass the famous DNA research and test? They must have switched semen or somat?
|
|
|
Post by Vadiation_Ribe on Jan 18, 2014 12:28:11 GMT
These articles are written to get publicity and it's worked.
Even if Kitson is TSF (which seems likely) I'd still reckon the truth is twisted and experiences from other players are included.
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Jan 18, 2014 12:29:31 GMT
Isn't TSF an ex international?
|
|
|
Post by chigstoke on Jan 18, 2014 12:35:03 GMT
I tell you this if jones does find him self on the bench and running up the side lines ..I'm going rip him to fuck and he can come see me after if he want Because that'll teach him a lesson won't it? How bloody ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by gb on Jan 18, 2014 12:37:51 GMT
Who makes this stuff up , they should be writing novels ..
|
|
|
Post by itsmorethanagame on Jan 18, 2014 12:41:43 GMT
His logic and conspiracy theory is completely flawed. He uses the goalie (Begovic) as an example have how we made up a story about him refusing to play. The reason we apparently did this was to put all other clubs off him and he says it worked. We now apparently make up a very similar story about KJ refusing to play but this time it's because we actually want to get rid of him? Using the same logic as Begovic surely we think this puts clubs off the player!? But no apparently that won't bother the likes of Everton yet it did for all of Begovic's suitors.
It's a complete bollocks article which completely contradicts itself and isn't thought out at all. The club don't need to turn the fans against him. I think we would all be happy to see him go regardless. There is 6 months on his contact and it's not getting renewed.
|
|
|
Post by Widget123 on Jan 18, 2014 12:42:28 GMT
Whoever tsf is that article is as close to libellous as anything I've read in the recent past. Very dangerous to publish unfounded rumours and issue a public challenge, possibly hoping that Coates can't be arsed to get involved in a mud slinging match.
A good solicitor could make a good case for the publishers printing an apology/retraction t the least and paying a substancial figure as a penalty for the article.
|
|
|
Post by stokecity4eva on Jan 18, 2014 12:51:21 GMT
has anyone sent a link to this article to the club on twitter to see what they make of the story as it would be lovely to see the club take a hardline stance on this matter and sue Mr Kitson
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2014 12:58:59 GMT
So sue then Kenwyne if there's no text.
Damages for professional reputation, remainder of contract and your ickle hurty-wurty feelingy-weelinglies.
(Where's Chrs & Cheesefax when you need them to argue the finer points of the claim's validity?)
Then, when he doesn't, Coatsey should sue that twot Kitson and test the concept of hiding behind a nom de plume.
(Chris? Cheesefax?)
99.9% of the world know who it is anyway after all.
Go for it Kenny lad.
Under the new laws, past in the last month or so, if it is all bollox - but I doubt it is all bollox - then the club would be entitled to know who wrote the damaging article (via the blog's publisher), so that they could pursue them for damages. And to have the offending article removed etc etc. I doubt a (proper) newspaper will reprint it ... which will/would be telling (one way or the other)?
|
|