|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 22, 2013 2:10:32 GMT
Did anyone else see the altercation between the older chap and young lad?
The old bloke was sitting down and kept shouting at the lad in front to sit down too as he couldn't see. When he ignored him he called him a c*nt and grabbed him round the neck, not the kind of behaviour you'd expect from someone that age.
He took a bit of abuse from a few folk and buggered off elsewhere.
Best part of the first half for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by 36dd on Dec 22, 2013 8:20:37 GMT
No just you then?
|
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 22, 2013 15:41:41 GMT
Well You'd have to in that part of the ground and at the game itself to have spotted it. Thanks for the input though. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2013 15:47:49 GMT
yup pretty much happened right behind me. The chap sitting was not a usual visitor to that area as the back of block 25 pretty much always stand. I kept my trap shut as I have been in too many altercations up theer in the past  |
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 22, 2013 15:50:15 GMT
yup pretty much happened right behind me. The chap sitting was not a usual visitor to that area as the back of block 25 pretty much always stand. I kept my trap shut as I have been in too many altercations up theer in the past It wasn't even his seat apparently. |
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Dec 22, 2013 15:52:10 GMT
This is why my seat is on the back row. Ya can stand all you want in front of me.  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2013 15:53:52 GMT
Nope there were noticeable abcenses from the back today...stewards came up and relocated his mate too
|
|
|
|
Post by Old School Stokie on Dec 22, 2013 15:56:32 GMT
People who stand up and block others view behind, whether that be at football matches, concerts, theatres, cricket matches are totally inconsiderate selfish c..ts and need ejecting by security or a good hiding to teach them a lesson - but I'm afraid the latter don't have the balls
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2013 15:58:02 GMT
People who stand up and block others view behind, whether that be at football matches, concerts, theatres, cricket matches are totally inconsiderate selfish c..ts and need ejecting by security or a good hiding to teach them a lesson - but I'm afraid the latter don't have the balls There would be few dragged out |
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Dec 22, 2013 15:59:22 GMT
People who stand up and block others view behind, whether that be at football matches, concerts, theatres, cricket matches are totally inconsiderate selfish c..ts and need ejecting by security or a good hiding to teach them a lesson - but I'm afraid the latter don't have the balls Glad you live by your statement under your username.  |
|
|
|
Post by Tonarme on Dec 22, 2013 16:02:01 GMT
there was a guy in block 2 at the game who was constantly swearing and there were kids around.. 2 or 3 of the parents told him to watch his language around the kids, and he told them to f**k off! completely wrong imo!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Dec 22, 2013 16:03:47 GMT
there was a guy in block 2 at the game who was constantly swearing and there were kids around.. 2 or 3 of the parents told him to watch his language around the kids, and he told them to f**k off! completely wrong imo!!! You are spot on mate. You should take kids in there. Completely wrong! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2013 16:04:45 GMT
there was a guy in block 2 at the game who was constantly swearing and there were kids around.. 2 or 3 of the parents told him to watch his language around the kids, and he told them to f**k off! completely wrong imo!!! Un called for that |
|
|
|
Post by Old School Stokie on Dec 22, 2013 16:07:52 GMT
So Stafford, you admit you are an inconsiderate selfish c..t. That's very noble of you. You think about adding my statement to your all time avatar
|
|
|
|
Post by stayingupforalasrimmed on Dec 22, 2013 16:09:06 GMT
People who stand up and block others view behind, whether that be at football matches, concerts, theatres, cricket matches are totally inconsiderate selfish c..ts and need ejecting by security or a good hiding to teach them a lesson - but I'm afraid the latter don't have the balls inconsiderate selfish cunts, tell them not us! |
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Dec 22, 2013 16:11:42 GMT
So Stafford, you admit you are an inconsiderate selfish c..t. That's very noble of you. You think about adding my statement to your all time avatar Did you not see the winky man at the end of the sentence? It is for the reasons you state that I got my seat on the back row. Likewise for away games I try and get seats near the back for the same reason. I like to stand but don't want to ruin some other Stokies day. Chill a bit, it's Christmas. |
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 22, 2013 16:58:03 GMT
Bring back terraced areas and we wouldn't have this problem. It's an unwritten rule, back of the stands, we'll stand when we want  In fact, they're even called 'stands' ! |
|
|
|
Post by adiebunn on Dec 22, 2013 17:11:04 GMT
Sidders,
Sorry but is Block 2 the Family Stand ? If it is then the person was wrong swearing in front of the children. If not, then that is where the people with children should be sitting. That is why they have a family stand !!! I am a bit old fashioned and wouldn't 'f & blind' in front of young children but to be honest it really pisses me off that I feel obliged not to swear if someone sits near me with a young child.
Cheers,
Adie
|
|
|
|
Post by Fred Astaire on Dec 22, 2013 17:22:55 GMT
Sidders, Sorry but is Block 2 the Family Stand ? If it is then the person was wrong swearing in front of the children. If not, then that is where the people with children should be sitting. That is why they have a family stand !!! I am a bit old fashioned and wouldn't 'f & blind' in front of young children but to be honest it really pisses me off that I feel obliged not to swear if someone sits near me with a young child. Cheers, Adie I think Block 2 would be over by the Player's tunnel somewhere at a guess |
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Dec 22, 2013 17:34:38 GMT
Sidders, Sorry but is Block 2 the Family Stand ? If it is then the person was wrong swearing in front of the children. If not, then that is where the people with children should be sitting. That is why they have a family stand !!! I am a bit old fashioned and wouldn't 'f & blind' in front of young children but to be honest it really pisses me off that I feel obliged not to swear if someone sits near me with a young child. Cheers, Adie I think Block 2 would be over by the Player's tunnel somewhere at a guess It is mate. Upper tier in the posh seats. |
|
|
|
Post by Fred Astaire on Dec 22, 2013 18:21:38 GMT
I think Block 2 would be over by the Player's tunnel somewhere at a guess It is mate. Upper tier in the posh seats. Crikey that's a bit hardcore for the posh seats. You'd expect pistols at dawn up there but certainly not swearing! |
|
|
|
Post by Sergeant Muttley on Dec 22, 2013 18:30:34 GMT
there was a guy in block 2 at the game who was constantly swearing and there were kids around.. 2 or 3 of the parents told him to watch his language around the kids, and he told them to f**k off! completely wrong imo!!! Not good at all mate and by the way is Kenwyne on his way in January |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2013 22:50:33 GMT
It looks like not swearing is a bit like giving up smoking? You have to contain yourselves in certain areas of the ground, then go out for a quick swear?
Do you all stand in a little huddle, away from the wind and rain, and say "Bugger, bollocks, fuck, shit, wank ..." Whilst non swearers look at you as if you are lepers?
The Gov't will be helping out with all of this in due course ..... some sort of patches (something like that I have been told). They cost the same price as a packet of fags, and you stick em over your gob. Actual price should be 50p, but taxes make them £5.20.
Our Gov't is fully committed to wiping out swearing, and cares. Think of the children!
Trials in Sweden have found them to be most effective.
|
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Dec 23, 2013 0:48:12 GMT
The only part of the ground that swearing should be frowned upon in my opinion is the family stand. I totally understand it's offensive, but we're all adults it should be water off a ducks arse. I've never understood shielding kids from swearing anyway, it exists, you aren't going to stop them learning it. If they don't learn it in the ground they'll learn it in school, simple really. It's all about how you educate them afterwards, making sure they don't go round f'ing this and that when it comes to a job interview etc etc.
...and as far as I'm concerned being told by some johnny-come-lately to refrain from swearing, in the place I've spent many a cold wet evening while they were probably watching Manchester United on the TV, is a bit of an insult. Jog on.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Dec 23, 2013 1:02:00 GMT
The only part of the ground that swearing should be frowned upon in my opinion is the family stand. I totally understand it's offensive, but we're all adults it should be water off a ducks arse. I've never understood shielding kids from swearing anyway, it exists, you aren't going to stop them learning it. If they don't learn it in the ground they'll learn it in school, simple really. It's all about how you educate them afterwards, making sure they don't go round f'ing this and that when it comes to a job interview etc etc. ...and as far as I'm concerned being told by some johnny-come-lately to refrain from swearing, in the place I've spent many a cold wet evening while they were probably watching Manchester United on the TV, is a bit of an insult. Jog on. Sounds good to me.  |
|
|
|
Post by stayingupfor GermanStokie on Dec 23, 2013 1:21:05 GMT
The only part of the ground that swearing should be frowned upon in my opinion is the family stand. I totally understand it's offensive, but we're all adults it should be water off a ducks arse. I've never understood shielding kids from swearing anyway, it exists, you aren't going to stop them learning it. If they don't learn it in the ground they'll learn it in school, simple really. It's all about how you educate them afterwards, making sure they don't go round f'ing this and that when it comes to a job interview etc etc. ...and as far as I'm concerned being told by some johnny-come-lately to refrain from swearing, in the place I've spent many a cold wet evening while they were probably watching Manchester United on the TV, is a bit of an insult. Jog on. Sounds good to me. Seems legit... I agree  |
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 23, 2013 4:26:23 GMT
It looks like not swearing is a bit like giving up smoking? You have to contain yourselves in certain areas of the ground, then go out for a quick swear? Do you all stand in a little huddle, away from the wind and rain, and say "Bugger, bollocks, fuck, shit, wank ..." Whilst non swearers look at you as if you are lepers? The Gov't will be helping out with all of this in due course ..... some sort of patches (something like that I have been told). They cost the same price as a packet of fags, and you stick em over your gob. Actual price should be 50p, but taxes make them £5.20. Our Gov't is fully committed to wiping out swearing, and cares. Think of the children! Trials in Sweden have found them to be most effective. That was good for you. |
|
|
|
Post by kidcrewbob on Dec 23, 2013 6:36:44 GMT
It looks like not swearing is a bit like giving up smoking? You have to contain yourselves in certain areas of the ground, then go out for a quick swear? Do you all stand in a little huddle, away from the wind and rain, and say "Bugger, bollocks, fuck, shit, wank ..." Whilst non swearers look at you as if you are lepers? The Gov't will be helping out with all of this in due course ..... some sort of patches (something like that I have been told). They cost the same price as a packet of fags, and you stick em over your gob. Actual price should be 50p, but taxes make them £5.20. Our Gov't is fully committed to wiping out swearing, and cares. Think of the children! Trials in Sweden have found them to be most effective. Don't forget the new "e-coss" device, stick it in your mouth and generate clouds of lite profanity - such as goodness, gosh, flipping 'eck, lumme, stone the crows, Gordon Bennett, fiddlesticks, blast and of course blinking ink.. |
|
|
|
Post by Fred Astaire on Dec 23, 2013 7:00:07 GMT
It looks like not swearing is a bit like giving up smoking? You have to contain yourselves in certain areas of the ground, then go out for a quick swear? Do you all stand in a little huddle, away from the wind and rain, and say "Bugger, bollocks, fuck, shit, wank ..." Whilst non swearers look at you as if you are lepers? The Gov't will be helping out with all of this in due course ..... some sort of patches (something like that I have been told). They cost the same price as a packet of fags, and you stick em over your gob. Actual price should be 50p, but taxes make them £5.20. Our Gov't is fully committed to wiping out swearing, and cares. Think of the children! Trials in Sweden have found them to be most effective. Don't forget the new "e-coss" device, stick it in your mouth and generate clouds of lite profanity - such as goodness, gosh, flipping 'eck, lumme, stone the crows, Gordon Bennett, fiddlesticks, blast and of course blinking ink.. There's no need for that kind of language young man. There's pensioners that read this mb you know!!! |
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Dec 23, 2013 9:01:16 GMT
When my dad took me in early eighties there was swearing. And? Its a bloody football match not the theatre.
If I took my daughter in the family stand and someone was swearing id smack them.
If I took her anywhere else in the stadium id think, it's a football stadium it happens.
What when the whole stadium sings ashley young you're a wanker?
May I suggest taking them with big ear defenders?
|
|
