|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Jul 10, 2013 13:57:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by wembley4372 on Jul 10, 2013 14:07:38 GMT
and thats where it should stay joe
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2013 14:09:52 GMT
nothing we didn't already know but at least there are pretty colours in this one
|
|
|
|
Post by harrysburrow on Jul 10, 2013 20:42:09 GMT
It takes a special kind of sad twat to take the time to write that crap doesn't it? Especially in the close season when we've changed managers and are quite openly now looking to play a different style of football? What a bellend.
|
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Jul 11, 2013 5:31:59 GMT
I think it was a good little piece.
|
|
|
|
Post by Linx on Jul 11, 2013 5:40:55 GMT
Agreed, Joe. It adds 'another dimension' to my defence of the club's decision to sack TP. It's amazing how the same neutrals who used to slag off our style of play are the same ones who can't understand the club's decision to get rid of their 'successful manager' who wasn't doing 'anything wrong'.
Anyway, onwards and upwards. It will take time to erase our image as the new Wimbledon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2013 6:50:12 GMT
I like that the writer has at least tried to pick a topic and go in to a bit of detail about it. Not great detail, but at least something different
|
|
|
|
Post by nik80 on Jul 11, 2013 6:52:06 GMT
Agreed, Joe. It adds 'another dimension' to my defence of the club's decision to sack TP. It's amazing how the same neutrals who used to slag off our style of play are the same ones who can't understand the club's decision to get rid of their 'successful manager' who wasn't doing 'anything wrong'. Anyway, onwards and upwards. It will take time to erase our image as the new Wimbledon. Name and shame These neutrals Linx |
|
|
|
Post by tachyon on Jul 11, 2013 8:24:28 GMT
It's a decent attempt to take a much more detailed look at Stoke's reliance on creating chances as close to goal as possible. The trouble was that once a side's methods become well documented, opponents then devise ways to combat even effective tactics, such as Rory's longthrow. So a side, even a relatively successful one, constantly needs to evolve to survive. The more times EPL regulars came up against Tony's Plan A, the better they performed against us. Here's a post about our record, sorted by the number of times our opponents had faced Stoke in the EPL linkThe parting of the ways or relegation was the only two likely outcomes. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2013 8:30:57 GMT
It's a decent attempt to take a much more detailed look at Stoke's reliance on creating chances as close to goal as possible. The trouble was that once a side's methods become well documented, opponents then devise ways to combat even effective tactics, such as Rory's longthrow. So a side, even a relatively successful one, constantly needs to evolve to survive. The more times EPL regulars came up against Tony's Plan A one and only plan, the better they performed against us. Here's a post about our record, sorted by the number of times our opponents had faced Stoke in the EPL linkThe parting of the ways or relegation was the only two likely outcomes. amended for you  totally agree |
|
