|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2013 7:14:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Jun 20, 2013 7:28:25 GMT
To be fair to Charlie, he has had less freedom in his play and a different style of player to pass to!
Dembele, Baird and Hangeleand would also make life easier for Charlie imo
Mark Hughes was an unpopular signing by many, given time I'm sure he will be well respected here: as for Danny Murphy? I'm not so sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by fca47 on Jun 20, 2013 7:46:38 GMT
Stupid comparison, Murphy is the fulcrum, that everyone passes to, whereas Adam has been stuck out wide.
|
|
|
|
Post by stockportstokie on Jun 20, 2013 7:53:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Jun 20, 2013 9:02:42 GMT
There is a link via the first post here. The article does highlight some interesting data - but given more freedom, it's Charlie Adam every time for me! I hope that Mark Hughes agrees and gives him the chance to play in a more positive role! |
|
|
|
Post by RichardTMP on Jun 20, 2013 9:05:45 GMT
Charlie Adam and Murphy had a lot of difference in time on the pitch.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2013 9:08:41 GMT
Murphy in his pomp was a much better player.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jun 20, 2013 9:09:39 GMT
Is Danny Murphy still alive?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2013 9:14:32 GMT
Murphy in his pomp was a much better player. This is the truth. How old is Danny Murphy now though? |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Jun 20, 2013 9:22:25 GMT
I stopped reading the article when he described us as 'brutish'. Southern ponce alert.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2013 9:37:36 GMT
Adam completed around a quarter of the amount of passes that Murphy did, yet still created more clear cut chances?
Sounds like Murphy had a touch of the "backwards, sideways, backwards/Joe Allen" about him.
|
|
|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on Jun 20, 2013 9:41:14 GMT
I noticed that stat too...Hes obviuosly miles better at creating chances!
|
|
|
|
Post by cmc89 on Jun 20, 2013 10:49:03 GMT
Adam barely played though? How can they compare the two?
|
|
|
|
Post by stockportstokie on Jun 20, 2013 10:57:23 GMT
Adam barely played though? How can they compare the two? They're insinuating Hughes will deploy Adam in a similar manner to which he had Murphy playing. |
|
|
|
Post by Somebody_Told_Me on Jun 20, 2013 11:34:12 GMT
800+ more passes, 1 less chance created!
lots of wasted passes then?
|
|
|
|
Post by stockportstokie on Jun 20, 2013 11:48:59 GMT
800+ more passes, 1 less chance created! lots of wasted passes then? Or 800 more passes contributed to Fulham's 49 goals to our 34. Depends which way you you want to look at it. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2013 11:57:18 GMT
800+ more passes, 1 less chance created! lots of wasted passes then? Or 800 more passes contributed to Fulham's 49 goals to our 34. Depends which way you you want to look at it. Yep. Just because every pass doesn't directly create a chance doesn't mean it's wasted. |
|
|
|
Post by Somebody_Told_Me on Jun 20, 2013 14:14:03 GMT
Or 800 more passes contributed to Fulham's 49 goals to our 34. Depends which way you you want to look at it. Yep. Just because every pass doesn't directly create a chance doesn't mean it's wasted. I agree with you both, just making a case for stats are difficult prove anything on 2 players in 11 man team. Hence, question mark. |
|
