|
Post by george2again on Jun 19, 2013 10:19:02 GMT
Seems everyone is calling him different names so I'm just going to stick with Leslie - great reference for our manager and very Stoke like. Sparky originated from his days at the shit, so that's out , and Hughesy has no imagination at all so that out for me. Do remember an article in the Oatcake years ago about nicknames and it was proclaimed that if Stoke has a Arabic right winger with one eye, one leg and was called Mustafa Smith, Stokeie's would nickname him ''Smithie'' anyway. (Think it was something like that). LESLIE for me anyway.
BIT BORED TODAY.
|
|
|
Post by foster on Jun 19, 2013 10:20:42 GMT
MH for me.
On here anyway.
|
|
hicc
Spectator
Hughes surveys Stokes midtable finishes & says: "You'll never be in this position again with me"
Posts: 49
|
Post by hicc on Jun 19, 2013 10:24:57 GMT
Seems everyone is calling him different names so I'm just going to stick with Leslie - great reference for our manager and very Stoke like. Sparky originated from his days at the shit, so that's out , and Hughesy has no imagination at all so that out for me. Do remember an article in the Oatcake years ago about nicknames and it was proclaimed that if Stoke has a Arabic right winger with one eye, one leg and was called Mustafa Smith, Stokeie's would nickname him ''Smithie'' anyway. (Think it was something like that). LESLIE for me anyway. BIT BORED TODAY. That Clueless CnT!
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Jun 19, 2013 10:31:52 GMT
He fast became known as "Sparkless" at QPR.
I'm sure that won't happen this time around though.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2013 10:37:01 GMT
Seems everyone is calling him different names so I'm just going to stick with Leslie - great reference for our manager and very Stoke like. Sparky originated from his days at the shit, so that's out , and Hughesy has no imagination at all so that out for me. Do remember an article in the Oatcake years ago about nicknames and it was proclaimed that if Stoke has a Arabic right winger with one eye, one leg and was called Mustafa Smith, Stokeie's would nickname him ''Smithie'' anyway. (Think it was something like that). LESLIE for me anyway. BIT BORED TODAY. he's had Sparky as a nickname since he was 7 or 8 at school so Sparky's fine
|
|
|
Post by TheWiseMaster on Jun 19, 2013 10:51:03 GMT
Also known as Lager Legs as a player!
|
|
tayterz
Academy Starlet
Me Owd Tayter...
Posts: 161
|
Post by tayterz on Jun 19, 2013 11:01:39 GMT
Also known as Lager Legs as a player! Hah! Lezzer Lager Legs
|
|
|
Post by Fenparkpotter on Jun 19, 2013 11:03:30 GMT
Sparky!
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Jun 19, 2013 11:09:11 GMT
Best to see how does, then decide.
|
|
|
Post by mcfctom on Jun 19, 2013 11:10:39 GMT
Went from Leslie to Clueless at ours. There wasn't a chance in hell of calling him fucking 'Sparky' though.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2013 11:19:53 GMT
Seems everyone is calling him different names so I'm just going to stick with Leslie - great reference for our manager and very Stoke like. Sparky originated from his days at the shit, so that's out , and Hughesy has no imagination at all so that out for me. Do remember an article in the Oatcake years ago about nicknames and it was proclaimed that if Stoke has a Arabic right winger with one eye, one leg and was called Mustafa Smith, Stokeie's would nickname him ''Smithie'' anyway. (Think it was something like that). LESLIE for me anyway. BIT BORED TODAY. That Clueless CnT! You do know Pulis has left yeh?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2013 11:26:25 GMT
Went from Leslie to Clueless at ours. There wasn't a chance in hell of calling him fucking 'Sparky' though. why clueless? because you finished 10th and got to the quarters of the UEFA Cup? given that your highest finish before that since coming back up was only 8th and for a few of the years you were 14-16th and flirting with relegation every now and again what's so wrong with 10th? personally i think it was far more to do with coming into money and therefore presuming you could just buy a top 4 finish straight away first year out...i'd say in that instance the "Clueless" tag is more apt for the fans than the manager...just another club that decided they were "Massive" and deserved silverware immediately as soon as you got some money in
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Jun 19, 2013 11:36:22 GMT
Went from Leslie to Clueless at ours. There wasn't a chance in hell of calling him fucking 'Sparky' though. why clueless? because you finished 10th and got to the quarters of the UEFA Cup? given that your highest finish before that since coming back up was only 8th and for a few of the years you were 14-16th and flirting with relegation every now and again what's so wrong with 10th? personally i think it was far more to do with coming into money and therefore presuming you could just buy a top 4 finish straight away first year out...i'd say in that instance the "Clueless" tag is more apt for the fans than the manager...just another club that decided they were "Massive" and deserved silverware immediately as soon as you got some money in Perhaps one away win that season was the reason. I'm pretty sure he'll be called worse than "Clueless" if he repeats that here.
|
|
|
Post by mcfctom on Jun 19, 2013 11:48:54 GMT
Went from Leslie to Clueless at ours. There wasn't a chance in hell of calling him fucking 'Sparky' though. why clueless? because you finished 10th and got to the quarters of the UEFA Cup? given that your highest finish before that since coming back up was only 8th and for a few of the years you were 14-16th and flirting with relegation every now and again what's so wrong with 10th? personally i think it was far more to do with coming into money and therefore presuming you could just buy a top 4 finish straight away first year out...i'd say in that instance the "Clueless" tag is more apt for the fans than the manager...just another club that decided they were "Massive" and deserved silverware immediately as soon as you got some money in He took a team that finished 9th, spent about £100m (admittedly a fair chunk of that in january) and took us to 10th we were in the bottom 3 at Christmas. He should have been sacked then but he got the chance to spend in january and we battled back up to 10th. He then spent god knows how much on mostly shite who we're just about getting rid of now (RSC £17.5m and 90k a week!). At the time he was finally sacked we'd won 2 in 11 but had set an impressive record for most drawn games in a row including hard fought high scoring draws against Burnley and Hull. our defending was worse than can possibly be comprehended despite him buying an entirely new back 4 of his choosing (playing Kompany in defence rather than midfield might have helped) and had Hart sat on the bench. The only thing that was keeping us in spitting ditance of Europe was Tevez being on a one man mission. Mancini came in and almost instantly sorted out the defence, very narrowly missed out on top 4 and then the rest is history. We won only a handful of away games in his time as well as the poster above said, I think that's a common theme wherever he's gone. EDIT. I actually think he had Hart out on loan after dropping him for Given the previous season.
|
|
|
Post by stokebloke on Jun 19, 2013 12:47:28 GMT
Mark!?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2013 19:37:42 GMT
why Leslie,I don't get that?
|
|
|
Post by george2again on Jun 19, 2013 19:46:25 GMT
why Leslie,I don't get that? Christened: Leslie Mark Hughes
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Jun 19, 2013 19:48:31 GMT
LMH
|
|
|
Post by foxysgloves on Jun 19, 2013 20:04:05 GMT
Also known as Lager Legs as a player! Lager or larger?!?
|
|
|
Post by Vadiation_Ribe on Jun 19, 2013 20:06:46 GMT
why clueless? because you finished 10th and got to the quarters of the UEFA Cup? given that your highest finish before that since coming back up was only 8th and for a few of the years you were 14-16th and flirting with relegation every now and again what's so wrong with 10th? personally i think it was far more to do with coming into money and therefore presuming you could just buy a top 4 finish straight away first year out...i'd say in that instance the "Clueless" tag is more apt for the fans than the manager...just another club that decided they were "Massive" and deserved silverware immediately as soon as you got some money in He took a team that finished 9th, spent about £100m (admittedly a fair chunk of that in january) and took us to 10th we were in the bottom 3 at Christmas. He should have been sacked then but he got the chance to spend in january and we battled back up to 10th. He then spent god knows how much on mostly shite who we're just about getting rid of now (RSC £17.5m and 90k a week!). At the time he was finally sacked we'd won 2 in 11 but had set an impressive record for most drawn games in a row including hard fought high scoring draws against Burnley and Hull. our defending was worse than can possibly be comprehended despite him buying an entirely new back 4 of his choosing (playing Kompany in defence rather than midfield might have helped) and had Hart sat on the bench. The only thing that was keeping us in spitting ditance of Europe was Tevez being on a one man mission. Mancini came in and almost instantly sorted out the defence, very narrowly missed out on top 4 and then the rest is history. We won only a handful of away games in his time as well as the poster above said, I think that's a common theme wherever he's gone. EDIT. I actually think he had Hart out on loan after dropping him for Given the previous season. You were 6th with a game in hand, unbeaten at home and in the League Cup semi-final when he was sacked. There probably wasn't much to choose between Given and Hart back then.
|
|
|
Post by Sammz on Jun 19, 2013 20:13:55 GMT
Les for now, Hughes if he does ok, Hughesy if he does well, Sparky only if he wins some silverware.... or gets us 3 points at the shit!
|
|
|
Post by Boothen on Jun 19, 2013 20:41:28 GMT
Always used to be 'Sparky' for me back when he was in my SWOS team on the Amiga, guess I'll stick with that.
|
|
|
Post by upthefud on Jun 19, 2013 20:50:19 GMT
Leslie for me
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on Jun 19, 2013 21:15:15 GMT
I think his name will be determined after our first home game against palace. If we get anything at Liverpool then he's on a good footing. However if we lose its no great shakes.
The palace game however is entirely different.
Win it and his name will be positive Lose it and it will be expletive.
I still think he's a bit of a cunt though. I hope he changes my perspective of him next season.
|
|
|
Post by thesandbankskid on Jun 19, 2013 21:16:45 GMT
The Silver One
|
|
|
Post by dickier on Jun 19, 2013 21:45:49 GMT
Doesn't matter we call him now, lets hope we call him the same name at the end of the season
|
|
|
Post by robinplumpton on Jun 19, 2013 22:13:52 GMT
Lets be honest, the way most people seem to be intimating, it wil be "The humourless c**t from the Sh*t" or if it goes well.......Brian?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2013 2:35:41 GMT
This week I'm mainly going to be calling him Trevor.
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Jun 20, 2013 3:24:18 GMT
Why is no one going with a good Stokie "Yogsy"?
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Jun 20, 2013 3:38:25 GMT
Mark
|
|