|
|
Post by pittshillplotter on Jun 17, 2013 23:29:23 GMT
To the Premiership .?
I think so...Give it a few months...
|
|
|
|
Post by audlemstokie on Jun 17, 2013 23:50:40 GMT
I think this is very unlikely to say the least. How many other clubs came after him when he was manager of Stoke?
|
|
|
|
Post by lastoftheldk on Jun 18, 2013 0:16:52 GMT
Yes, will be used by one of the clubs in the relegation fight this coming season
|
|
|
|
Post by pittshillplotter on Jun 18, 2013 0:19:43 GMT
Yes, will be used by one of the clubs in the relegation fight this coming season Quite possibly...Those were my thoughts too... |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2013 1:03:43 GMT
To the Premiership .? I think so...Give it a few months... Unlikely ....but you never know ... |
|
|
|
Post by Mint Berry Barks on Jun 18, 2013 3:06:14 GMT
No.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2013 4:31:20 GMT
I think later this season, when one of the promoted clubs is struggling, Maybe Palace, or Cardiff, Unlikely to be Hull, too far from Sandbanks....
|
|
|
|
Post by luke45 on Jun 18, 2013 7:20:44 GMT
There's no reason why he shouldn't, he's proven himself to be a decent manager at Premier League level and capable of stabilizing newly promoted teams in the league. His style of play may not be everyone's cup of tea but most owners only care about results, they don't really care how they are achieved.
|
|
|
|
Post by fca47 on Jun 18, 2013 7:27:29 GMT
Should do, but there are enough deluded idiots out there who would rather go down, playing what they call good (Losing) football.
|
|
|
|
Post by cdlstoke on Jun 18, 2013 7:27:59 GMT
There's no reason why he shouldn't, he's proven himself to be a decent manager at Premier League level and capable of stabilizing newly promoted teams in the league. His style of play may not be everyone's cup of tea but most owners only care about results, they don't really care how they are achieved. Most clubs haven't got a spare 100mil for tony to work with like he did at stoke. |
|
|
|
Post by fca47 on Jun 18, 2013 7:34:13 GMT
There's no reason why he shouldn't, he's proven himself to be a decent manager at Premier League level and capable of stabilizing newly promoted teams in the league. His style of play may not be everyone's cup of tea but most owners only care about results, they don't really care how they are achieved. Most clubs haven't got a spare 100mil for tony to work with like he did at stoke. did he need £100 million to keep us up the first season? Nothing like making things up. |
|
|
|
Post by luke45 on Jun 18, 2013 7:34:14 GMT
There's no reason why he shouldn't, he's proven himself to be a decent manager at Premier League level and capable of stabilizing newly promoted teams in the league. His style of play may not be everyone's cup of tea but most owners only care about results, they don't really care how they are achieved. Most clubs haven't got a spare 100mil for tony to work with like he did at stoke. Now the extra TV money has come in I reckon a large proportion of Premier League clubs could offer a 20 million a season budget over 5 seasons. |
|
|
|
Post by generationex on Jun 18, 2013 7:36:41 GMT
Well if they can't find 20 million a season they're down anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by withnall on Jun 18, 2013 7:37:51 GMT
We'll see him when he returns with his newly promoted Wrexham side in about 5 years time.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2013 7:41:07 GMT
Should do, but there are enough deluded idiots out there who would rather go down, playing what they call good (Losing) football. So 'good' football is invariably losing football is it? |
|
|
|
Post by geoff321 on Jun 18, 2013 7:50:08 GMT
I would think the last thing the anti Pulis fans would want is for Tone to get a job in the Premier League and prove them all wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrMagic on Jun 18, 2013 7:56:41 GMT
Should do, but there are enough deluded idiots out there who would rather go down, playing what they call good (Losing) football. So 'good' football is invariably losing football is it? Damn - got in there before me! I'd normally answer with a firm "no chance" but if kinnear can get a job anything is possible. To be honest I'd quite like it. You can imagine his after match interview after losing to us....... Interviewer. "So tony what was the difference between your side and stoke today" Tony. "About 100 million Derek, people might complain but we cant be expected to compete with that. If I had that kind of money here thinks would look different, as it is the players we have just need to be flexible." |
|
|
|
Post by MrMagic on Jun 18, 2013 7:58:48 GMT
I would think the last thing the anti Pulis fans would want is for Tone to get a job in the Premier League and prove them all wrong. And what exactly would that "prove" Geoff. Proof and the truth not being your strong points, I'd suggest you're on a sticky wicket there. "The anti-Pulis fans"? Give me strength. |
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Jun 18, 2013 7:59:45 GMT
I still think that he may work in the US in the near future.
|
|
|
|
Post by cdlstoke on Jun 18, 2013 8:10:18 GMT
Most clubs haven't got a spare 100mil for tony to work with like he did at stoke. did he need £100 million to keep us up the first season? Nothing like making things up. Yes 100mil over 5 years . Did well 1st couple of season but dire last 2 seasons. Most fans at other clubs won't put up with that football. Even Peter his big mate had seen enough. Get over him he's history. |
|
|
|
Post by geoff321 on Jun 18, 2013 8:13:59 GMT
cdlstoke
He may be history at Stoke, but this thread is about the future of Tony Pulis. How is that history?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2013 8:15:55 GMT
I hope not as I can not bare to watch Pulisball ever again, saying that i do have alot of respect for what he did for our football club.
|
|
|
|
Post by fca47 on Jun 18, 2013 8:26:03 GMT
did he need £100 million to keep us up the first season? Nothing like making things up. Yes 100mil over 5 years . Did well 1st couple of season but dire last 2 seasons. Most fans at other clubs won't put up with that football. Even Peter his big mate had seen enough. Get over him he's history. Try and rewrite history all you want, but he did not need £100 million to keep us up. In the first season we basically had the Championship team, and he kept us up comfortably. You might not like the football but don't make things up. |
|
|
|
Post by cdlstoke on Jun 18, 2013 8:26:50 GMT
cdlstoke He may be history at Stoke, but this thread is about the future of Tony Pulis. How is that history? Geoff I couldn't give two fucks about pulis, if he gets a job in the prem( which I don't think he will) or any other league. Why don't you follow him to wherever he lands because you seem more of a pulis fan than a stoke fan. I'm looking forward to seeing stoke play some football. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Jun 18, 2013 8:34:14 GMT
Most clubs haven't got a spare 100mil for tony to work with like he did at stoke. did he need £100 million to keep us up the first season? Nothing like making things up. No. He needed the £100 million to give us a worse team than the one that stayed up in the first season. |
|
|
|
Post by greyman on Jun 18, 2013 8:35:01 GMT
I would think the last thing the anti Pulis fans would want is for Tone to get a job in the Premier League and prove them all wrong. You have no right to an opinion. Fuck off. |
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Jun 18, 2013 8:39:17 GMT
I would think the last thing the anti Pulis fans would want is for Tone to get a job in the Premier League and prove them all wrong. Hi Geoff. Hope you're well. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2013 8:46:30 GMT
all i hope is that if he does come back to the Prem and has to visit the Brit then we have something about us and give him a welcome return and suitable ovation as thanks for the good things he DID do for us.all this bollocks about money spent, anyone could have done it with the money he had etc. is just that i.e. bollocks! we all know things weren't great for the last season or two but no-one can deny that the club is in a massively better position than it was before he came back and for that we owe him the respect and gratitude he has rightly earned.
the time for sniping, whinging,whining and character assassinations is over now, he's gone (which is what a lot of us wanted) and we've moved on.let's just make sure that even though Pulis has left us, our dignity hasn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrMagic on Jun 18, 2013 8:47:15 GMT
Yes 100mil over 5 years . Did well 1st couple of season but dire last 2 seasons. Most fans at other clubs won't put up with that football. Even Peter his big mate had seen enough. Get over him he's history. Try and rewrite history all you want, but he did not need £100 million to keep us up. In the first season we basically had the Championship team, and he kept us up comfortably. You might not like the football but don't make things up. On the subject of making things up.......... Thomas Sorensen Seyi olofinjara Dave Kitson Abdoulaye Faye Amdy Faye Ibrahima sonko Danny higginbotham Michael tonge Tom soares Matty etherington James Beattie Stephen Kelly Henri kamara Now I've done that list from memory so there may be the odd error, but that's 13 players signed after promotion, so staying up with the championship team, is exactly what you say, a rewrite of history. |
|
|
|
Post by geoff321 on Jun 18, 2013 8:48:28 GMT
There are two issues coming out in this thread. The first is whether Tony Pulis was successful at Stoke and the second, will he be successful in the Premier League again.
The answer to the first issue is yes, and the answer to the second, in my view, will be yes.
For people also to say they are not interested in the future of Tony Pulis is really strange. I would think every Stoke fan, if only out of curiosity, would be hugely interested in what position he eventually takes up.
|
|
