|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on May 6, 2013 21:06:19 GMT
When adam was taken off.....says it all.
|
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on May 6, 2013 21:09:52 GMT
When adam was taken off.....says it all. Him and about 20000 Stoke fans Beggars belief! |
|
|
|
Post by j3st3r on May 6, 2013 21:11:41 GMT
Thats because he knew Charlie was our only hope of unlocking their defence...
Matty came on and as usual offered nothing, other than a pass backwards...
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on May 6, 2013 21:19:47 GMT
It was the right decision, he was spent, bringing on someone that can run at the defence was whats needed, the hoof ball obviously wasn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sergeant Muttley on May 6, 2013 21:24:37 GMT
As much as i like Charlie Adam i thought he was knackered at that point and for me was the correct substitution but lets not get away from the fact that the 2nd half performance was woeful.Whether that was down to the manager is up for debate but i suspect he tried to settle for what he had at half time.
|
|
|
|
Post by 1982stokie on May 6, 2013 21:24:55 GMT
It was the right decision, he was spent, bringing on someone that can run at the defence was whats needed, the hoof ball obviously wasn't. In fairness Marty was never going to be effective he still looks to be struggling |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on May 6, 2013 21:31:32 GMT
It was the right decision, he was spent, bringing on someone that can run at the defence was whats needed, the hoof ball obviously wasn't. In fairness Marty was never going to be effective he still looks to be struggling He does look spent unfortunately, but as was mentioned on sky Adam was getting done time and time again by Johnson and something needed to happen. |
|
|
|
Post by 1982stokie on May 6, 2013 21:38:10 GMT
It was the right decision, he was spent, bringing on someone that can run at the defence was whats needed, the hoof ball obviously wasn't. In fairness Marty was never going to be effective he still looks to be struggling Fair point but he could have brought Kightly on at least he is fit if nothing else |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on May 6, 2013 21:40:16 GMT
Is this the Charlie Adam who suffered a nasty ankle injury in the first half?
We could do with him being fit for Spurs and Soton.
|
|
|
|
Post by foster on May 6, 2013 21:50:54 GMT
It was the right decision, he was spent, bringing on someone that can run at the defence was whats needed, the hoof ball obviously wasn't. In fairness Marty was never going to be effective he still looks to be struggling Matty has been spent for 2 seasons now and shouldn't even be at the club. Adam was fucked 20 minutes before he got subbed so that was a right but late decision. |
|
chadam
Academy Starlet
Posts: 109
|
Post by chadam on May 6, 2013 21:53:58 GMT
Adam looked knackered and hadn't looked dangerous for a while.
|
|
