|
|
Post by cousindupree on Nov 18, 2012 12:38:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by stokemark on Nov 18, 2012 12:47:56 GMT
Great lad, works his socks off
Shit mind you
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 18, 2012 12:48:04 GMT
I've no idea why it depresses you. Jarvis has been average and looks well overpriced at present. |
|
|
|
Post by fortressbritannia on Nov 18, 2012 12:55:26 GMT
I've no idea why it depresses you. Jarvis has been average and looks well overpriced at present. I agree at this moment Kightly looks like the most value for money. One thing that Kightly will do is score goals which may be behind TP's thinking as he's always banging on about the wide men scoring more goals. |
|
|
|
Post by stokemark on Nov 18, 2012 12:56:29 GMT
I've no idea why it depresses you. Jarvis has been average and looks well overpriced at present. All my wife's family support west ham and reckon Jarvis has been quality with regard to his ability to put a ball in accurately. Don't get me wrong - he was out of our price range and we were right to refuse to be held to random by wolves but Kightly simply doesn't compare when it comes to ability. |
|
|
|
Post by Bombus on Nov 18, 2012 12:58:23 GMT
Tear 'em apart Kitesssssssss!!
|
|
|
|
Post by jbstokie on Nov 18, 2012 13:00:15 GMT
Jarvis is undoubtedly the better player but we got far more value for money with Kightly.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 18, 2012 13:02:17 GMT
I've no idea why it depresses you. Jarvis has been average and looks well overpriced at present. All my wife's family support west ham and reckon Jarvis has been quality with regard to his ability to put a ball in accurately. Don't get me wrong - he was out of our price range and we were right to refuse to be held to random by wolves but Kightly simply doesn't compare when it comes to ability. Looking at the relative prices and assumed wages I would say Kightly has been the better deal as of right now. Jarvis has the potential to be much better I agree but as of yet that just hasn't happened. |
|
|
|
Post by stackman on Nov 18, 2012 13:08:30 GMT
I spoke to a very down to earth Wolves fan about this, he goes to most games and he said that Kightly was the only Wolves player giving his all when they were staring at relegation. He said Jarvis went missing so for me Kightly has the more passion and fight for the cause and going by the last time we played Wolves at the Brit, Kightly was far more dangerous than Jarvis. He needs time to bed in as does Adam
|
|
|
|
Post by cousindupree on Nov 18, 2012 13:14:59 GMT
I've no idea why it depresses you. Jarvis has been average and looks well overpriced at present. Sheiky. I think it depresses me because the manager describes Jarvis as an old fashioned winger who can get down the line and get crosses in which we haven't seen much of this season. Whereas according to TP Kightly is a good lad and works his socks off. We have plenty of those players and lack the quality in attack in our midfield 5. I accept that Jarvis was grossly overpriced though. |
|
|
|
Post by chrispk76 on Nov 18, 2012 13:16:56 GMT
Jarvis is not worth more than 3 times the value of kightly. I don't think we'll see the best of kightly until next season after his long injury lay off he had at wolves. Especially if we were to stick with him playing on the right which is his natural position.
|
|
|
|
Post by arniepieinthesky on Nov 18, 2012 17:44:19 GMT
£10m was to much for me, I'm happy we didn't opt for that, for that £10m, we got Kights, granted aint been a superb start, but has Jarvis had on with West Ham? That £10m, got us Nzonzi, Adam and Kights pretty much.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Nov 18, 2012 17:48:51 GMT
I've no idea why it depresses you. Jarvis has been average and looks well overpriced at present. Sheiky. I think it depresses me because the manager describes Jarvis as an old fashioned winger who can get down the line and get crosses in which we haven't seen much of this season. Whereas according to TP Kightly is a good lad and works his socks off. We have plenty of those players and lack the quality in attack in our midfield 5. I accept that Jarvis was grossly overpriced though. Fair dos mate, I'm in a minority I know but I think Kightly has been OK this season so far. Certainly no worse than the wingers last year and has had a couple of decent games. I definitely don't get all the negativity about him. |
|
|
|
Post by Stafford-Stokie on Nov 18, 2012 17:52:17 GMT
Sheiky. I think it depresses me because the manager describes Jarvis as an old fashioned winger who can get down the line and get crosses in which we haven't seen much of this season. Whereas according to TP Kightly is a good lad and works his socks off. We have plenty of those players and lack the quality in attack in our midfield 5. I accept that Jarvis was grossly overpriced though. Fair dos mate, I'm in a minority I know but I think Kightly has been OK this season so far. Certainly no worse than the wingers last year and has had a couple of decent games. I definitely don't get all the negativity about him. 100% agree Momo. |
|
|
|
Post by shiftyfifty on Nov 18, 2012 17:54:56 GMT
Sheiky. I think it depresses me because the manager describes Jarvis as an old fashioned winger who can get down the line and get crosses in which we haven't seen much of this season. Whereas according to TP Kightly is a good lad and works his socks off. We have plenty of those players and lack the quality in attack in our midfield 5. I accept that Jarvis was grossly overpriced though. Fair dos mate, I'm in a minority I know but I think Kightly has been OK this season so far. Certainly no worse than the wingers last year and has had a couple of decent games. I definitely don't get all the negativity about him. Apart from missing a sitter last week, I agree. |
|
|
|
Post by scfcbiancorossi on Nov 18, 2012 18:06:54 GMT
Fair dos mate, I'm in a minority I know but I think Kightly has been OK this season so far. Certainly no worse than the wingers last year and has had a couple of decent games. I definitely don't get all the negativity about him. 100% agree Momo. Agree. Well...in comparison with our other winger. |
|
|
|
Post by arniepieinthesky on Nov 18, 2012 18:07:20 GMT
Sheiky. I think it depresses me because the manager describes Jarvis as an old fashioned winger who can get down the line and get crosses in which we haven't seen much of this season. Whereas according to TP Kightly is a good lad and works his socks off. We have plenty of those players and lack the quality in attack in our midfield 5. I accept that Jarvis was grossly overpriced though. Fair dos mate, I'm in a minority I know but I think Kightly has been OK this season so far. Certainly no worse than the wingers last year and has had a couple of decent games. I definitely don't get all the negativity about him. He's been ok and he has a goal in him, but he needs to stay composed when he gets himself in the right positions. Head down is fine, but he needs lift it when putting a ball in the box or having a crack at goal. |
|
|
|
Post by PerCyfilth ....Captains Log on Nov 18, 2012 18:26:00 GMT
The difference between them is negligible and wont affect the game. The approach taken by the Managers will determine its outcome and we all know how Pulis approaches away games.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2012 20:32:51 GMT
I'd rather have pennant than any of them!
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Nov 18, 2012 20:37:18 GMT
Wouldn't it have been nice if Jarvis had chosen us over Wolves (?) when he left Gillingham 8 years ago and we were in for him?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bombus on Nov 18, 2012 21:21:19 GMT
Sheiky. I think it depresses me because the manager describes Jarvis as an old fashioned winger who can get down the line and get crosses in which we haven't seen much of this season. Whereas according to TP Kightly is a good lad and works his socks off. We have plenty of those players and lack the quality in attack in our midfield 5. I accept that Jarvis was grossly overpriced though. Fair dos mate, I'm in a minority I know but I think Kightly has been OK this season so far. Certainly no worse than the wingers last year and has had a couple of decent games. I definitely don't get all the negativity about him. Well said Sheiky! |
|
|
|
Post by luke45 on Nov 18, 2012 21:32:40 GMT
Sheiky. I think it depresses me because the manager describes Jarvis as an old fashioned winger who can get down the line and get crosses in which we haven't seen much of this season. Whereas according to TP Kightly is a good lad and works his socks off. We have plenty of those players and lack the quality in attack in our midfield 5. I accept that Jarvis was grossly overpriced though. Fair dos mate, I'm in a minority I know but I think Kightly has been OK this season so far. Certainly no worse than the wingers last year and has had a couple of decent games. I definitely don't get all the negativity about him. Agreed. I think Jarvis is over-hyped, for all his crossing abilities he only managed 5 assists last season and hasn't managed a single assist so far this season. Kightly has already scored more goals than him at this stage and I reckon he'll end the season with more goals than him. |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Nov 18, 2012 21:33:27 GMT
Isn't Jarvis injured for tomorrow?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2012 22:37:29 GMT
I'd rather have pennant than any of them! Pennant has been crap for over a season now, we called out for a player who would take on a player last season and he just didn't seem to be bothered. Don't get me wrong; Pennant's first season was one of the best I have ever seen of a player and he really stood out, but he hasn't been the same for a long while now. Kightly may never be able to hit those same heights but he looks the type that will consistently perform at a decent level and come up with a few goals. Atleast with Kightly you know that you are always going to get someone that wants to earn his money and play for your club. |
|
|
|
Post by SCFC92 on Nov 18, 2012 22:55:45 GMT
£10m was to much for me, I'm happy we didn't opt for that, for that £10m, we got Kights, granted aint been a superb start, but has Jarvis had on with West Ham? That £10m, got us Nzonzi, Adam and Kights pretty much. This  |
|
|
|
Post by johnnysoul60 on Nov 18, 2012 23:23:43 GMT
quite a few million sorts the difference really , Kightly might be ok though if he was played on the right as a winger , cause he is a right winger
|
|
|
|
Post by cousindupree on Nov 19, 2012 12:47:38 GMT
Its a really interesting fixture and I am looking forward to bunking off from the office and watch it. I usually watch away games with a bottle of bourbon at the ready!
Its a fascinating match up on a number of counts...
Kightly or Jarvis. Most effective wide man
Crouchy or Jones or Caroll...as the best big lump up front
Big Sam v Capped one the battle of the tactical dinosaurs!
|
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Nov 19, 2012 15:58:14 GMT
I'd rather have pennant than any of them! this Kightly will fight and work hard, that's true, but Jarvis will create much more. |
|
