|
|
Post by johnnysoul60 on Aug 23, 2012 22:30:44 GMT
I think Kightly is almost as good, not as quick but more variety to his game , I now see Moses may move for less and Jarvis is not in the same league as him , got to give Moxey credit but £5m tops is Jarvis value
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Aug 23, 2012 22:33:40 GMT
And where is this money coming from??
WHam still owe Sheff Utd £10M from years ago.
A big issue in football at the moment is the amount of money some clubs owe other clubs.
I would imagine Wolves were praying for a different club to come in so that they didn't have to deal with WHam.
|
|
|
|
Post by swampySCFC on Aug 23, 2012 22:38:03 GMT
whos better J or K. I always thoght J. Step up K
|
|
|
|
Post by johnnysoul60 on Aug 23, 2012 22:39:09 GMT
I dont think there is much in it if K stays fit
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Aug 23, 2012 22:40:45 GMT
I dont think there is much in it if K stays fit If (repeat IF) K stays fit he suits us better than Jarvis. |
|
|
|
Post by stokeyscrew on Aug 23, 2012 22:42:22 GMT
According to Mad Mick on sky this evening...he is the dogs..always tracks back..brilliant trainer etc
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2012 22:46:05 GMT
Do they both wear sunglasses & a suit?
|
|
|
|
Post by Stephen Frys' Ring on Aug 23, 2012 22:58:27 GMT
Matt Jarvis ... 26yrs old = £10.75M Michael Kightly...26yrs old = £3M approx. Ha ha ha ha ha winner winner kightly dinner........all day long. ( The above means i am well pleased with Stokes' deal)  ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Aug 23, 2012 23:03:42 GMT
Matt Jarvis ... 26yrs old = £10.75M Michael Kightly...26yrs old = £3M approx. Ha ha ha ha ha winner winner kightly dinner........all day long. ( The above means i am well pleased with Stokes' deal) ;D I wonder if the initial outlay on both players is much different. I think Wolves will have to wait a very long time if they expect to see anything like £10M from WHam (ask Sheff Utd). |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Aug 23, 2012 23:03:49 GMT
Matt Jarvis ... 26yrs old = £10.75M Michael Kightly...26yrs old = £3M approx. Ha ha ha ha ha winner winner kightly dinner........all day long. ( The above means i am well pleased with Stokes' deal) ;D Money doesn't matter to the likes of WHUFC neither does debt they'll spend what they want. |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Aug 23, 2012 23:11:41 GMT
Matt Jarvis ... 26yrs old = £10.75M Michael Kightly...26yrs old = £3M approx. Ha ha ha ha ha winner winner kightly dinner........all day long. ( The above means i am well pleased with Stokes' deal) ;D Money doesn't matter to the likes of WHUFC neither does debt they'll spend what they want. The chickens must come home to roost one day, surely!!! |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Aug 23, 2012 23:16:18 GMT
Money doesn't matter to the likes of WHUFC neither does debt they'll spend what they want. The chickens must come home to roost one day, surely!!! How though they're already 70m in debt and owe Sheffield United 12m and look like there spending shows no signs of stopping. What happened to this financial fair play rule? |
|
|
|
Post by Bombus on Aug 23, 2012 23:18:24 GMT
I dont think there is much in it if K stays fit If (repeat IF) K stays fit he suits us better than Jarvis. +1 |
|
|
|
Post by justinp on Aug 24, 2012 2:01:39 GMT
Well, Kightly is already on 2 in 2 for us, scored with his first touch for us, scored a scrappy goal last satdee, but meh. The way I see it, he's already scored half as many goals as both wingers scored last season in 1 game. He's a bull. He doesn't run past players and jinx them with skill, he just muscles through and still beats his man. Great signing. Just hope TP doesn't decide to bring him off at 72 mins every game, cos without him last week, we looked lost and had nothing going forward. I hope his form continues, and we could be looking at 3 players with 10+ goals this season (Usual suspects Crouch and SJW, pending transfers), I actually think he'll probably be our top scorer this season, if he picks up loose balls like that when it drops (something ethers and pennant never do, but lawrence used to).
As for sundee, I can see us putting 3 or 4 past the arse, they are toothless, Cameron and Kights wanting to prove themselves in front of the baying Britannia crowd. They are toothless without RVP. 3 or 4 nil, Crouch, Walters, 1 or 2 from Kightly.
|
|
|
|
Post by northantsash on Aug 24, 2012 6:05:45 GMT
when you see the jarvis deal and what is been mentioned re moses, you can see how good the deal for kightly looks.
He may have had his injury problems, but he clearly knows where the goal is and isnt afraid to put in a shift.
|
|
|
|
Post by Plave on Aug 24, 2012 6:05:56 GMT
What happened to this financial fair play rule? People keep misunderstanding ffp, ffp is a Uefa ruling which they can use to sanction clubs who don't comply, the likely sanction to be exclusion from European competition. If you're not a club expecting to get into Europe ffp is meaningless |
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Aug 24, 2012 6:12:03 GMT
What happened to this financial fair play rule? People keep misunderstanding ffp, ffp is a Uefa ruling which they can use to sanction clubs who don't comply, the likely sanction to be exclusion from European competition. If you're not a club expecting to get into Europe ffp is meaningless Correct - although there are currently discussions as to whether ffp, or something similar, should be implemented in the Premier League. |
|
|
|
Post by andylgr on Aug 24, 2012 7:00:01 GMT
A mate of mine who's a Wolves fan is pissed off that we got Kightley so cheap, he thinks we got the best deal by far out of him and jarvis. And he rates Kightley higher.
|
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Aug 24, 2012 7:23:12 GMT
Kightly a great deal - Moses and Jarvis overpriced in my opinion
Let's hope he remains injury free and can provide some quality crosses / passes to Crouch
|
|
|
|
Post by timmymallett on Aug 24, 2012 9:06:11 GMT
I have read this thread with interest.
Jarvis is robbery ?
Palacios and Crouch for £18 million is certainly robbery. Jarvis is a fair price for somebody who has many years left to play.
You mention Kightly but not the above tripe from Spurs; oh dear oh dear. Blinkered.
|
|
|
|
Post by philb on Aug 24, 2012 9:16:59 GMT
I have read this thread with interest. Jarvis is robbery ? Palacios and Crouch for £18 million is certainly robbery. Jarvis is a fair price for somebody who has many years left to play. You mention Kightly but not the above tripe from Spurs; oh dear oh dear. Blinkered. Yes but he was only comparing the two deals for Wolves players, why should he mention the Palacios deal? |
|
|
|
Post by timmymallett on Aug 24, 2012 9:19:40 GMT
The thread is called Daylight Robbery when it is cleary not when compared to the money Pulis has wasted on so much of our current squad.
It is always wise to look at the bigger picture when starting such threads.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnnysoul60 on Aug 24, 2012 9:28:27 GMT
The comparison was across the three , I rate Kightly and Jarvis as pretty close and I think that Moses has the potential to be a top premiership player , so in that group I think Jarvis is expensive, no doubt palacios now looks a massive mistake , Crouch is quality just needs players with him who compliment his style
|
|
|
|
Post by riponstokie on Aug 24, 2012 10:07:08 GMT
Kightly scores more and has a better end product. How many times have you seen jarvis run the ball out of play or cross the ball over the crossbar, that said would still have liked to see him play for us!
|
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Aug 24, 2012 10:18:05 GMT
5 yr deal with an option for a 6th!
Now that's a deal....for Wolves...and Jarvis.
Not sure about West Ham, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by dozintheseventees on Aug 24, 2012 10:21:59 GMT
5 yr deal with an option for a 6th! Now that's a deal....for Wolves...and Jarvis. Not sure about West Ham, though. Looks like West Ham desperately need him to be good if they have THAT kind of financial commitment wrapped up in him. |
|
|
|
Post by bunnyscfc on Aug 24, 2012 10:22:41 GMT
Kightly is good value, but I would have loved to have seen Jarvis replace Ethers. He goes at the full back every single time, and although his crossing needs working on, he would give us far more of a presence on the left in the final third.
he would win us corners and set pieces galore, and also chips in.
Jarvis and Kightly for £13m combined is about right.
|
|
|
|
Post by dozintheseventees on Aug 24, 2012 10:35:35 GMT
I agree that I'd have liked him at Stoke Bunny but West Ham now have some £25 Million invested in one player (at a conservative estimate). It's far too much mate and glad we didn't join that race. I rate him and I think lots of clubs will but the price is crazy. Jarvis has done well and looks a good player but just where has he shown that he's a £10 million player?
|
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Aug 24, 2012 10:36:09 GMT
they've got to pay for those new empty seats somehow why didn't they just fill in the corners |
|
|
|
Post by bunnyscfc on Aug 24, 2012 10:43:50 GMT
whilst I don't really want to see any club in the trouble Pompey are in, there would be much arfage and guffawing by me if West Ham joined them
|
|
;D 
1
