|
|
Post by spitthedog on Aug 18, 2012 18:47:47 GMT
A. Toss
B. Devoid of any goalscoring threat
C. Non-dimensional
or D. All 3
You decide?
We were comfortable with them on today, we were like a pub team when they went off.
It's not Rocket Science,
Ethers is getting alot of stick, but we really miss the option and his energy when he is not there.
|
|
|
|
Post by dieguito88 on Aug 18, 2012 18:49:34 GMT
D
|
|
|
|
Post by knype on Aug 18, 2012 18:49:53 GMT
D
|
|
|
|
Post by MayBankStokie_ST5 on Aug 18, 2012 18:50:08 GMT
D
|
|
|
|
Post by pombear on Aug 18, 2012 18:50:29 GMT
D
|
|
|
|
Post by Stokie Mcpot on Aug 18, 2012 18:51:02 GMT
E - Not as aggressive with attacks and always on the back foot
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Aug 18, 2012 18:51:46 GMT
Definitely D.
He hasn't come to terms with 4-5-1 as anything other than park the bus bollocks. It can be so much more but for whatever reason he can't see it.
|
|
|
|
Post by exiledstokie on Aug 18, 2012 18:56:43 GMT
We should never be in a position where we have 0 fucking wingers on the pitch though! There was nothing wrong with Kightly today, he could have carried on tormenting Reading until next Saturday!
It's infuriating watch the negative changes Pulis makes, because, they make no sense whatsoever, the only person that makes any sense out of the changes is the fucking useless dinosaur of manager!
|
|
bigboots
Youth Player
Annie eat your oatcake
Posts: 436
|
Post by bigboots on Aug 18, 2012 19:24:39 GMT
Dire
|
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Aug 18, 2012 19:32:59 GMT
D for Dire
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2012 19:33:40 GMT
F.... Fucking crap!
|
|
bigboots
Youth Player
Annie eat your oatcake
Posts: 436
|
Post by bigboots on Aug 18, 2012 19:43:19 GMT
Wingers are our escape route when we are up against it defensively, without them its like watching Zulu. The oppositon can windmill with no threat of a punch coming back, we turn into Audley Harrison.
|
|
