|
|
Post by luke45 on Feb 20, 2012 14:44:47 GMT
www.stokecityfc.com/page/NewsDetail/0,,10310~2617467,00.html I'm glad we've appealed it. I highly doubt the FA will revoke or reduce the ban though, if they deem Huth's tackle against Sunderland worthy of a 3 match ban then it's hard to have any hope whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
Post by snapotter on Feb 20, 2012 14:46:14 GMT
TP has compiled his DVD me thinks  |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Feb 20, 2012 14:46:18 GMT
Waste of time. Not a sending off in a million years, won't get rescinded in a million years.
|
|
|
|
Post by seddonstandviewer on Feb 20, 2012 14:48:37 GMT
<cups hand to ear>
Is that the sound of ranks closing in the distance?
|
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Feb 20, 2012 14:51:07 GMT
Waste of time. Not a sending off in a million years, won't get rescinded in a million years. This ^^^ He won the ball but the FA will just say it was reckless and uphold it. Pointless appealling it, The FA are just gonna get shirty and possibly add another game. |
|
|
|
Post by cousindupree on Feb 20, 2012 14:54:10 GMT
No harm in making the appeal even though it wont get overturned. At least it keeps the poor decision in the spotlight for a few days
|
|
|
|
Post by stokiedj on Feb 20, 2012 14:57:05 GMT
Hope he gets a extra game. Not cause he deserves it, simply because were a better team without him, as shown again yesterday.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Feb 20, 2012 15:09:30 GMT
Hope he gets a extra game. Not cause he deserves it, simply because were a better team without him, as shown again yesterday. Oh do give it a fucking rest. |
|
|
|
Post by Roy Cropper on Feb 20, 2012 15:14:49 GMT
It won't get rescinded, the FA seem to have lost all reason in their pathetic backing of referee's. If the decision is incorrect then it is wrong to simply ignore the facts just to defend the officials.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2012 15:16:21 GMT
Won't get rescinded, but we need to do it on principle, so everybody knows about the atrocious refereeing towards tackles that is going on.
|
|
|
|
Post by fortressbritannia on Feb 20, 2012 15:23:51 GMT
I think Gordon Strachan made a good point on the FA cup highlights show last night that the referee's know the rules but don't know the game and on that principle I don't think that it'll get over turned the FA will close ranks again
|
|
|
|
Post by cubegame on Feb 20, 2012 15:26:37 GMT
Hope we're also appealing Collins not getting sent off.........
|
|
|
|
Post by prem4stoke on Feb 20, 2012 15:30:08 GMT
If the red card stands, I'm sorry but a sliding tackle must now be banned in the game. How can any player go into a sliding tackle without it being a red card?
|
|
|
|
Post by stokelad84 on Feb 20, 2012 15:32:22 GMT
I can't see the FA letting us off.
Unless it's against one of the rules/regulations for a 4th official to make the decision over the referee's head??
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Feb 20, 2012 15:33:18 GMT
If the red card stands, I'm sorry but a sliding tackle must now be banned in the game. How can any player go into a sliding tackle without it being a red card? And that's where Pulis has a major point about communication. That is a pretty major change in the game if the sliding tackle has been banned arbitarily by Mike Riley. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2012 15:33:22 GMT
Having had the pleasure of meeting Rory this morning whilst walking round Wesfield shopping centre in Derby i can only say that i'm surprised that the club are appealing the sending off given the chat i had with him.He thought with Probert giving the decision we had very little chance of getting it overturned.He also talked about the Huth sending off as well and told me the club were told within 10 minutes of the appeal going in that it wouldn't be overturned which i find remarkable.Told him i was flying out Thursday and he said it'll be a fantastic occasion for all our fantastic fans.Him and his mrs were a credit and and i felt like i'd known him for ages talking to him.Whether supporters feel Rory is good enough for the 1st team now or not[including myself] one thing is for sure he's a TOP BLOKE.
|
|
|
|
Post by boothenender7 on Feb 20, 2012 15:35:41 GMT
shitty rule, it was a good, hard tackle and the ball was won but the over-reacting crawley bench and the theatrics of the felled player stitched delap up, it should be-but wont be rescinded and dont be shocked if if delap gets an extra game added to his ban for a frivelous appeal!! the old boys at fa hq are a bunch of old bastards like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2012 15:36:24 GMT
Referees are a closed shop, won,t get rescinded!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2012 15:47:34 GMT
Not a chance it will get recinded. It's a joke, a 3 game ban for a superb tackle!
|
|
|
|
Post by mozzer68 on Feb 20, 2012 15:52:47 GMT
Can't see it being overturned.
As has already been stated, if they wouldn't overturn Huth's then this has no chance.
You have to be Lampard or Gerrard and the likes to get away with slide tackles.
The authorities won't be happy until they have outlawed tackes altogether, (well from Stoke players anyway)
Their is definately one rule for one and one for us.
|
|
|
|
Post by fca47 on Feb 20, 2012 15:55:00 GMT
Just like the Huth one, won't be successful.
|
|
|
|
Post by oasis on Feb 20, 2012 16:13:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Janet in ST5 on Feb 20, 2012 19:17:24 GMT
It's embarrassing, sending a player off after awarding a throw in. Watched it until I'm sick of it, but the ref holds his arm out awarding a throw in to Stoke because that's what he saw. Tosser on the line said different. Wonder how much of a tit Probert feels after not sending off Cabaye for something a whole lot worse?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jamo on the wing on Feb 20, 2012 19:20:06 GMT
It should be black and white but it won't be.
TP is quite right, if Probert didn't think Cabeye deserved a red for the challenge on Spearing then quite clearly Rory's challenge cannot be a sending off (it isn't ever a red card anyway).
The incident highlights just how inept Mr. Probert is but no doubt the F.A. will close ranks and back their man as seems the norm of late.
It's criminal that a player can be sent off for a legitimate tackle like that but the authorities will keep going until the real football fans are driven away from the sport.
It's football, not netball.
|
|
|
|
Post by Janet in ST5 on Feb 20, 2012 19:24:12 GMT
Having had the pleasure of meeting Rory this morning whilst walking round Wesfield shopping centre in Derby i can only say that i'm surprised that the club are appealing the sending off given the chat i had with him.He thought with Probert giving the decision we had very little chance of getting it overturned.He also talked about the Huth sending off as well and told me the club were told within 10 minutes of the appeal going in that it wouldn't be overturned which i find remarkable.Told him i was flying out Thursday and he said it'll be a fantastic occasion for all our fantastic fans.Him and his mrs were a credit and and i felt like i'd known him for ages talking to him.Whether supporters feel Rory is good enough for the 1st team now or not[including myself] one thing is for sure he's a TOP BLOKE. Thanks for sharing. Rory does always come across as a thoroughly decent type. Glad we have evidence now! He's also got snake hips!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Feb 20, 2012 19:38:58 GMT
Gareth Southgate, the FA's technical director, when commenting post match on ESPN said 'it's one we should appeal and get rescinded' so that's fooked it then, the FA's left and right hand don't know what's going on  |
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Feb 20, 2012 19:40:10 GMT
It should be black and white but it won't be. TP is quite right, if Probert didn't think Cabeye deserved a red for the challenge on Spearing then quite clearly Rory's challenge cannot be a sending off (it isn't ever a red card anyway). The incident highlights just how inept Mr. Probert is but no doubt the F.A. will close ranks and back their man as seems the norm of late. It's criminal that a player can be sent off for a legitimate tackle like that but the authorities will keep going until the real football fans are driven away from the sport. It's football, not netball. Good post. IMO the person who shoulders most of the blame for the current outlawing of legitimate tackling is the footballing anti-christ himself Arsehole Whinger from the nest of cunts at the Arsetime stadium. Until this despicable piece of garlic crunching slime leaves our game then I fear for its future as a decent, exciting contact sport. But alas I fear the damage may already be irreversible. |
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Feb 20, 2012 19:44:50 GMT
It should be black and white but it won't be. TP is quite right, if Probert didn't think Cabeye deserved a red for the challenge on Spearing then quite clearly Rory's challenge cannot be a sending off (it isn't ever a red card anyway). The incident highlights just how inept Mr. Probert is but no doubt the F.A. will close ranks and back their man as seems the norm of late. It's criminal that a player can be sent off for a legitimate tackle like that but the authorities will keep going until the real football fans are driven away from the sport. It's football, not netball. Good post. IMO the person who shoulders most of the blame for the current outlawing of legitimate tackling is the footballing anti-christ himself Arsehole Whinger from the nest of cunts at the Arsetime stadium. Until this despicable piece of garlic crunching slime leaves our game then I fear for its future as a decent, exciting contact sport. But alas I fear the damage may already be irreversible. Pisser ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Feb 20, 2012 19:46:28 GMT
Gareth Southgate, the FA's technical director, when commenting post match on ESPN said 'it's one we should appeal and get rescinded' so that's fooked it then, the FA's left and right hand don't know what's going on I thought he said we were likely to appeal it but wouldn't get it rescinded but then I am a bit mutton. What? |
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Feb 20, 2012 19:53:25 GMT
I can't see the FA letting us off. Unless it's against one of the rules/regulations for a 4th official to make the decision over the referee's head?? I think that this should be a major part of the appeal. and the outcome needs to clarify the role of all officials. Yes they are there to help each other but the referee is the one whose decision is final! It's not as if the referee hadn't made his mind up straightaway! He immediately awarded a THROW IN to Stoke - no free kick, no yellow card let alone a red one! He didn't feel the need to consult the official on the line , let alone the 4th official. |
|
