|
|
Post by jezzascfc on Oct 31, 2011 22:16:36 GMT
...who thinks we should play Woodgate and Crouch ahead of Huth and Jones (not including you Tone!)?
|
|
|
|
Post by GrandStokie on Oct 31, 2011 22:18:04 GMT
In a word "no."
|
|
|
|
Post by pulismaskreplica on Oct 31, 2011 22:19:33 GMT
No
|
|
|
|
Post by mysteriojr on Oct 31, 2011 22:19:51 GMT
the crouch/Jones situation is debatable...... crouch isnt half bad.....but im starting to hope(* for the sake of the team) that woodgate breaks a toe or something)
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 31, 2011 22:20:47 GMT
No, Woodgate is awful and Crouch was about 7 million quid too much.
|
|
|
|
Post by pickins on Oct 31, 2011 22:23:22 GMT
Crouch was doing some great link up ( theory ) play tonight . . . only trouble was Walters was nowhere to be seen. As for Woodgate I can't see for the life of me how he comes ahead of Huth in the pecking order.
|
|
|
|
Post by tuum on Oct 31, 2011 22:28:48 GMT
Not me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tubes on Oct 31, 2011 22:30:38 GMT
I'd play Crouch over Jones any day of the week.
|
|
|
|
Post by luke2u on Oct 31, 2011 22:30:47 GMT
I don't think Crouch has done much right. His service is poor, but when he has the ball he's doing a lot of strange choices and poor passing. I haven't seen anything yet to justify his fee.
|
|
|
|
Post by knype on Oct 31, 2011 22:31:51 GMT
I don't think Crouch has done much right. His service is poor, but when he has the ball he's doing a lot of strange choices and poor passing. I haven't seen anything yet to justify his fee. His link up play is too clever for the 2 incompetent marathon men in CM.... |
|
|
|
Post by wattie on Oct 31, 2011 22:33:24 GMT
I have never rated Jones but have to say since hes had to fight for his place coz of Crouchies arrival he has improved loads and deserves to start based on current form .
|
|
|
|
Post by JP on Oct 31, 2011 22:34:55 GMT
jones fucks me off, doesnt run into the channels when either of the RB or RM has the ball and woodgate is wank in the air.
|
|
