|
|
Post by glouscesterstokie on Apr 12, 2008 20:13:25 GMT
is he injured or dropped ?
cus if hes dropped thats a joke hes on of our best midfielders
|
|
|
|
Post by rindalstokie on Apr 12, 2008 20:14:12 GMT
He was sick according to BBC Stoke.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokecityscott on Apr 12, 2008 20:14:15 GMT
He had sickness.
|
|
|
|
Post by garymoore26 on Apr 12, 2008 20:41:58 GMT
in bed sick
|
|
|
|
Post by potters11 on Apr 12, 2008 20:46:07 GMT
Didn't think we missed him personally. Pugh + Delap were fine in the centre.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maccca100 on Apr 12, 2008 20:46:27 GMT
when asked how sick
he replied im doing my younger sister
|
|
|
|
Post by Championship Potter on Apr 12, 2008 21:02:16 GMT
I'd leave him on the bench for our next match, Pugh gives us more bite in midfield which is lacking when we play Whelan and Delap. Delap was very good today as well, I lost count of the amount of Coventry attacks he broke up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Big J on Apr 12, 2008 21:03:29 GMT
He was over the toilet puking his stomach acid up... Tidy.
|
|
|
|
Post by boothenendboy on Apr 12, 2008 21:08:05 GMT
lets face it,he wasn't sick.he had the shits.never mind glenny boy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stick It On Cort's Head on Apr 12, 2008 21:13:22 GMT
Thought Pugh was non existent,as was Pearson...
Whelan has to go straight back in.
Bite?
Thats Glenn's middle name. I think Pugh is a touch too lightweight to play in centre mid in this division( prob better in the prem , more time on the ball).
Whelan is our best centre mid , we definitley missed him today, luckily our hoofing and high pressure game worked and so we didnt need to pass it around .
|
|
|
|
Post by potters11 on Apr 12, 2008 21:17:06 GMT
SIOCH: I think you need to sort that location out!
|
|
|
|
Post by Stick It On Cort's Head on Apr 12, 2008 21:19:59 GMT
It will still be true though Potters ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Championship Potter on Apr 12, 2008 21:25:26 GMT
I guess it's all about opinions. Personally I think Whelan has been poor recently, he looked good when he first joined but he has had a dip in form. Pugh did a good job winning the ball and made some good runs going forward too, it's obvious centre midfield is his best position, but Pulis insists on playing him at left back or on the wing.
|
|
|
|
Post by glouscesterstokie on Apr 13, 2008 19:21:19 GMT
i would play whelan over pugh easily
|
|
|
|
Post by landofhopeandglory on Apr 13, 2008 20:09:59 GMT
whelan was our best player second half against palace,and has been on is own in midfield since he came here, he has had to put up with a unfit diao or that waste of space decrap and then theres no pace pugh, a fit diao would be ideal then whelan could get forward more and have a few more shots at goal and support the front men, so untill that happens we will not see the best from him, my be pearson is worth ago with him
|
|
|
|
Post by bobafett on Apr 13, 2008 20:12:44 GMT
Whelan will start saturday . I though Pugh had a shaky game saturday .
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2008 20:46:19 GMT
I don't think Ive seen anything like what I expected from Glenn Whelan yet.
Ive said this before - from what Ive seen so far, Id far prefer a James O'Connor or Daryl Russel over him (Whelan) presently.
My 'jury's' presently 'out' on Glenn Whelan and, I'm expecting much, much better before I am convinced.
To be fair, Liam Lawrence took quite a while to settle in too and, I recall, many was the debate (on here) over whether our Liam was a waste of money or not. too
That debate has now been settled I hasten to add !
|
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Apr 13, 2008 23:06:17 GMT
I completely agree with Tony...underawed is how I would describe it..!  |
|
