|
|
Post by tazi on Apr 4, 2011 10:23:31 GMT
For that dreadful/despicable two footed lunge on Pennant?.
If so then could someone please send the still to them because why the fuck should he get away scot free and yet wanky Walton sent off Ryan for a laces challenge?.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Apr 4, 2011 10:30:31 GMT
No, the referee gave a foul.
|
|
|
|
Post by scfcloyalist on Apr 4, 2011 10:33:52 GMT
You must be joking, he plays for chelsea you know!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by tazi on Apr 4, 2011 10:33:55 GMT
No, the referee gave a foul. Thank you. Then Walton should be brought to book and questioned as to why he never sent him off or at least to give a yellow because afterall for him to have given a freekick then he must have seen an offence take place and a quite shocking one at that. Edit -But you get to hear nothing and that is one of the main reasons why they've lost any respect that they may once have had. Wankers the lot of e'm. |
|
|
|
Post by scfcloyalist on Apr 4, 2011 10:41:30 GMT
He can still be punished because he didnt recieve a card, will he? Will he balls, its chelsea.
|
|
|
|
Post by ersaurebot 1, 000, 000 views on Apr 4, 2011 10:44:10 GMT
never even made it to MOTD did it
|
|
|
|
Post by Baggs on Apr 4, 2011 10:44:35 GMT
Impossible to have respect for referees while they duck out of making tough decisions. Vidic not being shown a red for hauling down the last man and/or scything down Ba start of second half very weak refereeing. Phil Dowd sending off the Bburn guy - bad decision but fair enough in real time, and at least he'd be able to rescind it on reflection.
I think they should be forced to face the press after the game - if a guy says "sorry I missed that, on reflection I would have done x" then everyone would be happy with it, especially if players could then retroactively be banned for cynical fouls/diving. It seems to me that the FA and this PMGO (Premier Match Game Officials or whatever, who supply the refs to the Prem - ridiculous set up) are so juiced in though that the status quo is unlikely to be challenged. Sad really because it takes so much away from the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by scfcloyalist on Apr 4, 2011 10:50:41 GMT
Couldnt agree more, the refs in this country are so corrupt.
|
|
|
|
Post by Will_75 on Apr 4, 2011 10:55:47 GMT
they might be many things, but are they fuck corrupt. grow up
|
|
|
|
Post by tazi on Apr 4, 2011 10:56:44 GMT
He can still be punished because he didnt recieve a card, will he? Will he balls, its chelsea. If i had the computer knowledge i'd send the still to the FA asking if they intend to take action. Will someone send it please, love to hear what they'd have to say about it?. |
|
|
|
Post by scfcloyalist on Apr 4, 2011 11:04:30 GMT
they might be many things, but are they fuck corrupt. grow up Are you for real? The number of times bottom half clubs have been shafted against the big clubs is a disgrace, neville vs wba, neville vs us, essien vs us, fabregas vs us last season, rooney vs us first season. The refs always DO favour the big sides and its wrong, the only ref whos got balls and actually goes against the top sides on the odd time is phil dowd. So HOW is this not corrupt? The way they favour the top sides? |
|
|
|
Post by tazi on Apr 4, 2011 11:11:00 GMT
For starters you can't really prove that Walton declined a few hundred grand from the Chelski hierachy.
|
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Apr 4, 2011 16:43:14 GMT
Can you imagine the outcry if Shawcross had done that?
It really makes your blood boil.
Has anyone actually seen it on video, just so we can be sure that it as as scandalously reckless a tackle as that one frame gives the impression it is?
|
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Apr 4, 2011 16:46:20 GMT
Hmm. Dunno what to make of it having seen this. It's a bloody strange tackle - but, got to be honest, not quite as violent and out of control as that one frame suggests.  |
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Apr 4, 2011 16:50:42 GMT
Can you imagine the outcry if Shawcross had done that? It really makes your blood boil. Has anyone actually seen it on video, just so we can be sure that it as as scandalously reckless a tackle as that one frame gives the impression it is? I've held off from saying this but still frames prove absolutely nothing - the Shawcross incident should have taught us that. I watched the replay on telly and it was a poor challenge but from what I recall he seemed to slip at the last minute, making a poorly-timed one-footed tackle into an unintentional two-footed one. There also wasn't much force in it because it was a late slip, which is why that still is surprising everyone - it simply wasn't as bad as it looks. It still deserved a yellow but no more imo. |
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Apr 4, 2011 17:27:47 GMT
He certainly aint going for the ball at all, so look again.
Its a definite Red.
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Apr 4, 2011 17:29:07 GMT
Barely a booking imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by scfcloyalist on Apr 4, 2011 17:30:51 GMT
You post some stupid posts potterlog but this tops the lot, how the fuck wasnt that a red? It looked shocking in real time and after seeing that picture it just proves he should have gone.
|
|
|
|
Post by fentonstokie1 on Apr 4, 2011 20:17:52 GMT
never even made it to MOTD did it Surely that doesn't surprise you ! |
|
|
|
Post by heavysoul on Apr 4, 2011 20:22:12 GMT
Defo red card - shoot the mofo  |
|
|
|
Post by padders01 on Apr 4, 2011 20:22:44 GMT
Come on you lot
It's the slighest touch on Pennant's legs, defintely not a red card
You are making us to sound like a bunch of moaning bastards, when we boo and slag John Terry off for doing the same thing
|
|
|
|
Post by fentonstokie1 on Apr 4, 2011 20:23:15 GMT
Can you imagine the outcry if Shawcross had done that? It really makes your blood boil. Has anyone actually seen it on video, just so we can be sure that it as as scandalously reckless a tackle as that one frame gives the impression it is? I've held off from saying this but still frames prove absolutely nothing - the Shawcross incident should have taught us that. I watched the replay on telly and it was a poor challenge but from what I recall he seemed to slip at the last minute, making a poorly-timed one-footed tackle into an unintentional two-footed one. There also wasn't much force in it because it was a late slip, which is why that still is surprising everyone - it simply wasn't as bad as it looks. It still deserved a yellow but no more imo. It was as red as Fergies nose, Jermaine saw it coming and got of the ground before it hit him else it could have been a really serious injury ffs. |
|
|
|
Post by lawrieleslie on Apr 4, 2011 20:33:45 GMT
Come on guys we are beginning to sound like arsehole cockney wankers. On another point who heard sheepshearer on motd justify the vidic yellow card for hauling down the last man because "the keeper was coming off his line to meet the attacker". Is this a "fergie only" rule or does it apply to everybody.
|
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Apr 4, 2011 20:34:48 GMT
You post some stupid posts potterlog but this tops the lot, how the fuck wasnt that a red? It looked shocking in real time and after seeing that picture it just proves he should have gone. It didn't look shocking in real time. It was hardly noticed and the ref didn't even book him. That's why people on here are so surprised at this photo. A yellow would have been the sensible decision. |
|
|
|
Post by tazi on Apr 5, 2011 11:32:24 GMT
Did he slip?.....Did he fuck.
Did he intend to play the ball?......Did he fuck.
Dirty Chelski rotten bastards.
Edit - Just for good measure Essian slid his studs down Pennants leg the scumbag.
As for Walton he's a fucking arsehole who should never ever officiate again the old cunting tosser.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dr Oetcake on Apr 5, 2011 11:41:19 GMT
Did Shawcross intend to break Ramseys leg, yet he was sent off for a far less worse challenge that the Essien one, its only because JP saw him coming and got airbourne that this wasnt a leg breaker.
|
|
|
|
Post by Squeekster on Apr 5, 2011 11:48:03 GMT
He can only be charged now if Walton has another look at it and says he made a mistake.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dr Oetcake on Apr 5, 2011 12:06:28 GMT
I think you will find Walton is back at his lumber mill worrying if Cora Beth is listening to his phone calls, as indeed would I be....
|
|
|
|
Post by dexter97 on Apr 5, 2011 13:28:49 GMT
Come on guys we are beginning to sound like arsehole cockney wankers. On another point who heard sheepshearer on motd justify the vidic yellow card for hauling down the last man because "the keeper was coming off his line to meet the attacker". Is this a "fergie only" rule or does it apply to everybody. Whether or not Essien's tackle was "morally" worthy of a red, using decisions on other similar tackles as a benchmarch, he should've walked. As the chant goes, "He plays for Stoke, you send him off". As regards Vidic, while there's no doubt he should've picked up a second yellow for chopping Ba down just before HT, I didn't think (as many do) that he deseved to go for the first challenge, when Ba was the "last man". Contrary to popular belief, it's not an offence to foul the last man unless in doing so the defender is denying a clear goalscoring opportunity. Ba didn't have the ball under control when he was fouled, so it doesn't matter that Vidic was the last man. |
|
|
|
Post by sirpineapple89 on Apr 5, 2011 14:05:22 GMT
If that's a red then I might as well give up watching football. It's a yellow at worst as it's definitely a high one but he's not going through at any real speed or with any real malice IMO. He's just slipped.
|
|
