|
|
Post by Beloved Monkfish on Apr 7, 2008 21:55:58 GMT
On the whole to be fair, we didn't do too badly tonight, especially in the 2nd half. Created enough chances and probably should/could have had 3 or 4. One huge positive was the performance of Glenn Whelan, thought he was excellent tonight.
BUT
Why does Pulis insist on continuing with Pugh at left back when we have the excellent Dickonson on the bench? Whenever we play he concedes, and he was woefully at fault for the first goal. There's not a chance in hell Dicko would have been beaten so easily.
Cresswell. For one how the hell was he man of the match? Granted he's out of position but at this stage of the season we can't have passengers and people 'putting in a shift' Why leave Cresswell on instead of Pearson, one of the few players who actually looked like creating something and playing in a more natural position?
the Fuller decision was always going to be a risky one and it backfired spectacularly. An unfit and disinterested Ameobi looked poor. The thing that annoyed me about Pulis in his reasoning of why Fuller didn't start was 'Ric hasn't played for 3 weeks'. How many games has Ameobi played this season and when was the last time he played for Newcastle's first team?
Pulis has done so well this season and has signed some very good players. So for fucks sake, play these players and play them in their proper positions! This season is fast turning into one of frsutartion.
If we can all see the galring mistakes in Pulis starting lineup, then why can't he!?
|
|
|
|
Post by bolognese on Apr 7, 2008 22:26:33 GMT
pretty much agree with those sentiments although Cresswell only played due to Liam's injury
|
|
|
|
Post by PulisCameraAction on Apr 7, 2008 22:35:01 GMT
Alright abs
|
|
