|
|
Post by itscoldatwork on Jan 31, 2011 20:11:12 GMT
sky sports show BA signing for west ham for 500k, what is that all about?
|
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Jan 31, 2011 20:14:32 GMT
The rest was paid in Porno mags. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by GerrysGonnaGetYa on Jan 31, 2011 20:16:03 GMT
I saw that too, must be a shed load of extras if he ever gets fit and plays....
|
|
|
|
Post by itscoldatwork on Jan 31, 2011 20:19:55 GMT
must be 500k upfront and then 3 million per knee if they last til the end of the season
|
|
|
|
Post by numpty40 on Jan 31, 2011 20:24:10 GMT
How many millions were we going to pay for hime a couple of weeks ago?
|
|
|
|
Post by stokemark on Jan 31, 2011 20:37:48 GMT
We fucked this deal right up with our 'loan' bravado
We could have done a similar deal but we conna negotiate our way out of a paper bag
|
|
|
|
Post by teanite on Jan 31, 2011 22:38:16 GMT
i saw that too, missed chance i think!!! a proper fuck up!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by petershiltonsmini on Jan 31, 2011 22:39:44 GMT
we will see not convinced of his quality yet
|
|
|
|
Post by DentySCFC on Jan 31, 2011 22:40:10 GMT
It has to be a typo. No club would sell a player valued at £6m one week, then sell him for £500k the next.
They've got Sidwell to Fulham on there for £250k as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Somebody_Told_Me on Jan 31, 2011 22:40:18 GMT
The way West Ham give money away it's a mistake and they put his first months wages.
|
|
|
|
Post by kevan45 on Jan 31, 2011 22:42:26 GMT
The player's knacked
|
|
|
|
Post by stokeyhunter on Jan 31, 2011 22:58:23 GMT
West Ham are desperate
|
|
|
|
Post by PenkhullStokie on Jan 31, 2011 23:12:08 GMT
It's the loan fee.
|
|
|
|
Post by nott1 on Jan 31, 2011 23:17:31 GMT
It's £500k as far as the TAXMAN is concerned!  |
|
