|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2011 12:37:16 GMT
They are not better than Djourou, Vermaleen or Koscielny. I give you they are better than Squallaci Koscielny doesn't look anything special. That's in the games when he manages to keep himself on the pitch for 90 minutes.
|
|
wenger
Academy Starlet
Posts: 119
|
Post by wenger on Jan 3, 2011 12:39:51 GMT
They are not better than Djourou, Vermaleen or Koscielny. I give you they are better than Squallaci Koscielny doesn't look anything special. That's in the games when he manages to keep himself on the pitch for 90 minutes. Koscielny has just come to the PL....I will tell you this. He's the best reader of the game we have in our defence.....very intelligent classy defender who has been unlucky
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2011 12:40:12 GMT
No......because both can actually defend! then how come they have conceded more goals? I would have thought that was obvious even for a thick little cockney twat like yourself. Think about the teams they play for and you might just get your answer??????? One thing is for certain,like i said earlier,they are both far better centre halves than those 2 clowns you currently have masquerading as defenders. That complete wanker of a manager you have doesn't really have a good track record when it comes to centre halves,does he?
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Jan 3, 2011 12:41:00 GMT
Veramaelen is good
the other 3...
|
|
|
Post by scfcloyalist on Jan 3, 2011 12:42:04 GMT
hes not even a true fan mate, wouldnt even bother with him, he cant even spell names right of there OWN players, bet he lives in meir or somewhere, claims he watches them every week haha
|
|
|
Post by stokeyhunter on Jan 3, 2011 13:22:50 GMT
Vermaelen i like big centre half scores a lot of goals and is a very good defender Koscielny i havent seen much except when he gets sent off and has misses the easiest header to score so i cant really say much on him and Djourou just because he is at a top 4 team doesnt make him better than cahill and shawcross
|
|
|
Post by bettsy on Jan 3, 2011 13:31:18 GMT
cahill is a better all round player than shawcross, and you can see why he is ahead of ryan in the england set-up, however, they are both worth around that bracket, after how stupid the football world has gone, and with them both still being young they should bring around that money. totally agree he is a better all round player at the moment, however if ryan was more composed on the ball he would be better and coyle 20 to 30 million! keep off them crack pipes sunshine
|
|
|
Post by PickSCFC on Jan 3, 2011 14:37:14 GMT
Cahill is better than Shawcross imo
|
|
|
Post by tuncaysanli20 on Jan 3, 2011 15:04:05 GMT
£20 million for Cahill ;D ;D ;D Lescott was fucking ridiculous. Neither are worth more than £5 million.
That tombstone toothed twat Coyle makes me feel quite ill every time I see him. He looks like a gargoyle and his teeth must have 7 inch roots ;D
|
|