|
|
Post by mountain1863 on Mar 30, 2008 19:14:55 GMT
sorry its abit late but i thought stoke were the main match on the championship this morning saw 15mins worth of action when normally isnt it the first half hour?both me and me father watched it seperately and we soon as it finished we both went to say to each other about more coverage of chartonia and dingles.....how much did they show of chartonia and the Dingles about the same amount of time as stoke......?interviews with that cunt pardew and that mackem twat as well......hmmmmmmm main match my arse........!  lets look on rather than backwards aswell theres another 5 games to go.....go'arn stoke premiership here we come mountain1863 |
|
|
|
Post by Marc01 on Mar 30, 2008 19:18:53 GMT
I think about 10 mins for the main game (max) - seemed shorter than usual (but it was Stoke - so ITV didnt want to get too carried away).
The Charlton v Wolves game was on for at least as long and possibly longer than the 'main game' - which has never happened before when i've watched the prog.
|
|
|
|
Post by mountain1863 on Mar 30, 2008 19:22:35 GMT
we wernt the only ones then..... it does really get to me how 95% of the media either A)ignore us B)put the club and its acheivements this season down to fluke C)say we are a one ball team that doesnt play football (given this was true at the begging of the season but since before christmas i dont believe this to be true.....as much as before ) D)all three!!! |
|
|
|
Post by bettyswallocks on Mar 30, 2008 20:05:09 GMT
Must say though there wasnt too much to show was there
|
|
|
|
Post by beagriestache on Mar 30, 2008 20:29:08 GMT
So much paranoia out there! Looked a shite game, why show lots of boring football if that's what it was?
Relax
|
|
|
|
Post by **** Pulling Himself Off on Mar 30, 2008 20:31:19 GMT
I agree with beagriestache. People always moan about our coverage regardless.
|
|
|
|
Post by mountain1863 on Mar 30, 2008 21:00:46 GMT
i try not to moan about our coverage kinder this is and was my first moan at the coverage that stoke have recieved this season......i know it was a poor game but there have been many times when i have watched the main game and it has been poor but shown in full......
im not paranoid in the slightest just feel that the points above describe the way in which we are treated by the mass media out there when was the last time you saw/read a news article or sports report that stated stoke were the far superior side and won by great ways and means when we have in a match or was the last time you read an article that stated we are one trick ponies no class just 6'8" hoof ball specialists........
|
|
|
|
Post by tsueam on Mar 30, 2008 21:17:35 GMT
i was a bit disappointed with their coverage also:
they missed some of Stoke's attacking opportunities - when Bothroyd went through and buggered it up, when we countered and Pearson switched to Lawrence in the first half and he had a good chance, when Kav brought down Lawrence in the first-half on the edge of the area, when Ameobi did his bad (?) challenge in the first five mins, etc etc
And when they matched the clip to what Pulis was saying in interview i think they got the wrong penalty claim!
they could've shown these incidents.
the wolves charlton match was well worth giving coverage to and i think there should be scope for this if a good match suddenly comes up
|
|
|
|
Post by mountain1863 on Mar 30, 2008 21:22:29 GMT
thats a fair reply there tsueam
|
|
