DICKO

[Premiership for hutchstokie]

sending off or not? I personally thought no but after seeing it on the championship i would have to say hes been very lucky.

[stennymuir]

Whilst at the game i thought yellow card at the most but after seeing it on tv i reckon he was lucky not to get sent off.

[Stick It On Cort's Head]

No, just a mistimed challenge .

Worthy of a yellow.

[trebor63]

I was still far too 'down' to watch the Championship this morning but at the match i thought yellow was right.

The fact that seven or eight Wednesday players surrounded the ref like a gang of hysterical schoolgirls at every opportunity made some challenges appear worse than they were. The treatment on Lawro was very ott but we've got proper men playing for us and they didn't squeal cos we got fouled!

[dexter97]

Given the current clampdown on tackling, and The Wendies' hysterical reaction to it, I wouldn't have been surprised if he'd walked. However IMHO it was just a late tackle - not high, studs-up or two-footed, so a yellow was about right.

Credit to the ref for not being bullied into giving a red. Having said that, looking at the penalty claim, maybe he just bottles controversial decisions.

[Tony Clueless]

I was at the game and i thought that he should have definitely been sent off. It was one of the worst challenges that have seen all season

[owlzat]

It was a shocking tackle, both late and taking both the young lads legs away.

I'm not surprised by some of our players reactions to it as like I said, he is only a young lad who's just gotton into tghe first team in the last few months and performed well so is going to be protected by the older players.

[sirpineapple89]

Fucking woman. Get up and get on with it.

[dexter97]

owlzat said:

It was a shocking tackle, both late and taking both the young lads legs away.

Cut the hyperbole, Owlzat - The fact that it was late and took his legs away does not make it a "shocking tackle". High or two-footed and I'd have agreed with you, but this is a man's game, or have you forgotten that in Yorkshire? It was a poor tackle, deserving of a yellow. Nothing more.

owlzat said:

I'm not surprised by some of our players reactions to it as like I said, he is only a young lad who's just gotton into tghe first team in the last few months and performed well so is going to be protected by the older players.

This wasn't the only occasion your lot were getting in the ref's face. Not too dissimilar in fact to their counterparts across the city during Colin's tenure.

[owlzat]

Maybe it has something to do with the game at the Brittania when Shawcross took Jeffers out with a shocking challenge from behind too ?

[Stick It On Cort's Head]

Jeffers is just an injury prone twat.

Strong challenge from Ryan. He buckled.

[Jamo on the wing]

Neither tackle was THAT bad owl, I thought you were supposed to be real men up Yorkshire, you're beginning to sound like those hysterical Barnsley boys.
My three year old could tackle Franny Jeffers and snap him in two, he's long had an allergy to grass look at his injury record.

[swampySCFC]

owlzat said:

Maybe it has something to do with the game at the Brittania when Shawcross took Jeffers out with a shocking challenge from behind too ?

Dont talk fucking stupid. That injury was a pure accident and you know it.

[sovietonion]

A red for me, it was just plain late and reckless and with some of the hair trigger refs lately he was fortunate.

I'd have been fucking livid if an oppo player did that on one of ours and only got a yellow. We got lucky there!

[bobafett]

It was a yellow card . It was late but not high . Dicko was trying to play the ball and mistimed it . The way the Wednesday players surrounded the referee led by Graham Greedy Crabanagh was laughable .

[robin1302]

Yellow at most, wasn't high was it, he slide along the ground and caught him late

[Soi Cowboy]

Red- wreckless, dangerous and late



Had roles been reversed sure so many above would have changed their tunes


Lucky boy

[Olgrligm]

Yellow, but at the start of the season would have only been a foul. Credit to the referee for not jumping on the bandwagon.

[markscfc72]

hutchstokie said:

sending off or not? I personally thought no but after seeing it on the championship i would have to say hes been very lucky.

good job we didnt have Rennie judging by what he sent Kabba off for!!, nothing compared to Dickos challenge!

[kingdeano]

certain red, late and synical. bloody great one show the kids tho! dicko dicko dicko

[Deleted]

thought the ref got it spot on

with all the windy fuss surprised he didn'nt get sent off

[bettyswallocks]

No malice in it however to break somebodys leg you dont need malice, it was a very poor tackle. Yes this is a mans game but the player had that edge on Dicko and got lucky being able to play on. Any other day and it would of been a red card. How kav didnt get sent off I do not no.

[Premiership for hutchstokie]

he deliberately bought down lawrence when clear on goal well was on the right hand side abit and what did the ref do? FUCK ALL!!!

[kingdeano]

if he only booked dicko for his then their was no way he was sending kav off for his tackle, no where near as bad as dickos.

[Deleted]

When I saw it, I thought he was off - straight red would have been right.

Sheff Weds players went to town with the ref on every tackle we made - especially Kav

[potters11]

At the time I thought red!

[nostrilsmoffat]

Haven't seen it yet, is the Championship repeated does anybody know?