|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2010 23:40:06 GMT
How much more are we likely to spend...?
Wasn't there talk of a £20 million War Chest..?
|
|
|
|
Post by entropy92 on Aug 22, 2010 23:41:37 GMT
How much more are we likely to spend...? Wasn't there talk of a £20 million War Chest..? how is it only 4.75? I think we'll break the bank again on Rodders to be honest |
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Aug 22, 2010 23:43:54 GMT
you mean £10.75m
|
|
|
|
Post by stokie23 on Aug 22, 2010 23:44:08 GMT
1 more big signin....plus gibson season long loan  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2010 23:46:06 GMT
No....I mean £ 4.75 million. £ 2 million on Kenwyne Jones. £ 2.75 on Walters. Total is £ 4.75 Million. |
|
|
|
Post by french toast on Aug 22, 2010 23:46:11 GMT
he means how we pay 2 mill a year for kenny.
pulis also said we are paying the walters fee over a period of time aswell
|
|
|
|
Post by entropy92 on Aug 22, 2010 23:48:34 GMT
its still 10.75 no matter how u look at it
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2010 23:50:29 GMT
its still 10.75 no matter how you look at it No....It means that £ 6 Million is still in the bank...Coates' bank. |
|
|
|
Post by entropy92 on Aug 22, 2010 23:52:19 GMT
its still 10.75 no matter how you look at it No....It means that £ 6 Million is still in the bank...Coates' bank. whatever! |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Aug 22, 2010 23:55:30 GMT
its still 10.75 no matter how you look at it No....It means that £ 6 Million is still in the bank...Coates' bank. That's the way it seemed to me. I agree with You mumf!  |
|
|
|
Post by Inverness Stokie on Aug 22, 2010 23:56:21 GMT
Nobody actually knows how much money as gone out of the club SO FAR.
We have signed two players and the total amount of the fees for both players is £10.75M or in the region of that fee.
|
|
|
|
Post by One-Two on Aug 22, 2010 23:58:25 GMT
FloCuv probably cost a bit too
|
|
|
|
Post by Inverness Stokie on Aug 22, 2010 23:59:35 GMT
FloCuv probably cost a bit too Over a period of time possibly One-Two, I wasn't aware that we paid a fee for the kiddie though. |
|
|
|
Post by Malex on Aug 22, 2010 23:59:59 GMT
However we aparently paid KJ a large signing on fee to make sure he didn't lose out on taking a lower wage. If reports are true that he's halved his weekly from £60k p/w to £30k p/w then we must have paid him a signing on fee in the region of £6,250,000 which would take our actual spending to £11M so far and over half of our alleged £20M war-chest.
|
|
|
|
Post by entropy92 on Aug 23, 2010 0:00:19 GMT
FloCuv probably cost a bit too forgot about him i hope he makes an appearance or 2 this season he looked good |
|
|
|
Post by entropy92 on Aug 23, 2010 0:01:18 GMT
However we aparently paid KJ a large signing on fee to make sure he didn't lose out on taking a lower wage. If reports are true that he's halved his weekly from £60k p/w to £30k p/w then we must have paid him a signing on fee in the region of £6,250,000 which would take our actual spending to £11M so far and over half of our alleged £20M war-chest. surely theres no way we would of paid that much signing on fee |
|
|
|
Post by One-Two on Aug 23, 2010 0:03:18 GMT
Sunderland gave him a massive get lost gift, which meant the signing on fee was much less for us.
|
|
|
|
Post by Inverness Stokie on Aug 23, 2010 0:04:02 GMT
Didn't they call it some sort of loyalty bonus as he didn't personally request a transfer?
|
|
|
|
Post by french toast on Aug 23, 2010 0:04:35 GMT
However we aparently paid KJ a large signing on fee to make sure he didn't lose out on taking a lower wage. If reports are true that he's halved his weekly from £60k p/w to £30k p/w then we must have paid him a signing on fee in the region of £6,250,000 which would take our actual spending to £11M so far and over half of our alleged £20M war-chest. surely theres no way we would of paid that much signing on fee sunderland gave him a golden handshake not us of course he had a signing on fee but i doubt it was even a million |
|
|
|
Post by Malex on Aug 23, 2010 0:05:56 GMT
However we aparently paid KJ a large signing on fee to make sure he didn't lose out on taking a lower wage. If reports are true that he's halved his weekly from £60k p/w to £30k p/w then we must have paid him a signing on fee in the region of £6,250,000 which would take our actual spending to £11M so far and over half of our alleged £20M war-chest. surely theres no way we would of paid that much signing on fee I don't have a clue if that's the actual fee or not, it's just what it works out to if the rumours are to be believed. However some of that, or maybe even a lot of that, was reportedly paid by Sunderland anyways. Is nothing but pure speculation at the end of the day  |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Aug 23, 2010 0:07:00 GMT
surely theres no way we would of paid that much signing on fee sunderland gave him a golden handshake not us of course he had a signing on fee but i doubt it was even a million That is standard practise what Sunderland did though. We would have done the same with Beattie. To get him in our wage structure we have alledgedly paid him a massive signing on fee. Obviously none of us know but the figures above make sense if as alledged he is still on what he was at Sunderland. |
|
|
|
Post by entropy92 on Aug 23, 2010 0:09:20 GMT
sunderland gave him a golden handshake not us of course he had a signing on fee but i doubt it was even a million That is standard practise what Sunderland did though. We would have done the same with Beattie. To get him in our wage structure we have alledgedly paid him a massive signing on fee. Obviously none of us know but the figures above make sense if as alledged he is still on what he was at Sunderland. doesnt make sense to me its alright doing that to keep every other player sweet but whats happens if we sold him  |
|
|
|
Post by stantheman7 on Aug 23, 2010 8:11:05 GMT
i don't think it makes any difference what we've think we've spent up to yet . lets see what we've spent at the end of the window then if people want to they can applaud or criticize .
with regards to paying transfer fees over a period of time or not . they have still committed stoke city to over £10 million .who'd have thought they'd ever see us paying £8 million for a player a few yrs ago ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mozzaa on Aug 23, 2010 8:13:32 GMT
Every club bar the big boys pay in installements its not a wide known fact though to be fair.
|
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Aug 23, 2010 8:24:18 GMT
sunderland gave him a golden handshake not us of course he had a signing on fee but i doubt it was even a million That is standard practise what Sunderland did though. We would have done the same with Beattie. To get him in our wage structure we have alledgedly paid him a massive signing on fee. Obviously none of us know but the figures above make sense if as alledged he is still on what he was at Sunderland. and because the 8m is in 2m installments even if we have given him up to 2m up fron it only amounts to an initial payment of 4m very good business |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2010 9:13:12 GMT
We only need to spend another £16 million and we'll catch up Wolves... Midfield hopefully.
|
|
