|
|
Post by PickSCFC on Jul 1, 2010 21:24:30 GMT
What numpty put a clause in his contract letting him leave on a free ffs, simmo IS a quality keeper and should NEVER have been allowed to leave on a free, he is worth atleast £1million imo, i cant believe we hav given him away for fuck all  |
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Jul 1, 2010 21:26:43 GMT
Wasn't he out of contract when that new one was agreed? Not exactly a strong position to be making demands.
|
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Jul 1, 2010 21:27:51 GMT
chuffed for him
|
|
|
|
Post by sufolkstokie on Jul 1, 2010 21:27:45 GMT
It is what it is, get over it - we got him on a free = top deal all round
|
|
|
|
Post by PickSCFC on Jul 1, 2010 21:28:44 GMT
Wasn't he out of contract when that new one was agreed? Not exactly a strong position to be making demands. he signed a 12 month contract not long ago, we should have got some money for him |
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Jul 1, 2010 21:29:04 GMT
Knowing he'd have an exit on a free, making him attractive in the market, was probably the only reason he signed the 1-yr extension in the spring though.
There probably aren't going to be many C'ship teams with sizeable money available to sign someone like Simo.
It probably suited everyone that we, however briefly, had 3 keepers available, but Simo could cover himself at the same time by leaving when and if a better, more attractive and longer-term deal turned up for him.
|
|
|
|
Post by PickSCFC on Jul 1, 2010 21:29:48 GMT
It is what it is, get over it - we got him on a free = top deal all round yeah great deal isnt it, weve a let a quality keeper leave for naff all |
|
|
|
Post by sufolkstokie on Jul 1, 2010 21:52:03 GMT
It is what it is, get over it - we got him on a free = top deal all round yeah great deal isnt it, weve a let a quality keeper leave for naff all Have you ever posted owt positive? We got him on a free, he did great for us and now he has gone - he aint greedy and the whole deal leaves SCFC better for having Simmo |
|
|
|
Post by PickSCFC on Jul 1, 2010 21:53:25 GMT
yeah great deal isnt it, weve a let a quality keeper leave for naff all Have you ever posted owt positive? We got him on a free, he did great for us and now he has gone - he aint greedy and the whole deal leaves SCFC better for having Simmo yes i have, im just a bit peeved that we have given him away for nowt when he is clearly worth good money |
|
|
|
Post by sufolkstokie on Jul 1, 2010 21:58:52 GMT
Have you ever posted owt positive? We got him on a free, he did great for us and now he has gone - he aint greedy and the whole deal leaves SCFC better for having Simmo yes i have, im just a bit peeved that we have given him away for nowt when he is clearly worth good money Ok - but over his wee lifetime with us we got great value - yes we should of got some money but we got him for nowt so not like buying Carson for gazillions and selling him for 1p Actually it is rather refreshing to look after a bloke who cares for SCFC and we came to a deal which was want ya but cant really play ya as 1st or 2nd - here is the fairest deal we can come up with Anyways I am talking bollocks - awesome at Spuds Simo - ta |
|
|
|
Post by One-Two on Jul 1, 2010 21:58:54 GMT
Without that clause in his contract, he would have just left on a free and not signed that extension. So thanks to that clause, we had 3 'keepers for a few months.
The choices were either, keep him for a while and then let him go on a free when somebody wants him, or let him go on a free straight away. There is nothing to complain about there!
|
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Jul 1, 2010 22:07:00 GMT
Without that clause in his contract, he would have just left on a free and not signed that extension. So thanks to that clause, we had 3 'keepers for a few months. The choices were either, keep him for a while and then let him go on a free when somebody wants him, or let him go on a free straight away. There is nothing to complain about there! That's what i was trying to say. Thanks for making a better job of it than i did.  |
|
|
|
Post by bostonstokie on Jul 1, 2010 22:44:46 GMT
Without that clause in his contract, he would have just left on a free and not signed that extension. So thanks to that clause, we had 3 'keepers for a few months. The choices were either, keep him for a while and then let him go on a free when somebody wants him, or let him go on a free straight away. There is nothing to complain about there! This. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jul 1, 2010 22:48:14 GMT
Without that clause in his contract, he would have just left on a free and not signed that extension. So thanks to that clause, we had 3 'keepers for a few months. The choices were either, keep him for a while and then let him go on a free when somebody wants him, or let him go on a free straight away. There is nothing to complain about there! This. + 1 |
|
|
|
Post by stokelad84 on Jul 1, 2010 22:48:55 GMT
+2
|
|
|
|
Post by johnfarmersmum on Jul 1, 2010 22:51:04 GMT
Simmo added the clause...................... Simple
|
|
|
|
Post by Aleksandr Orlov on Jul 2, 2010 12:27:03 GMT
we signed him on a free. Let him go on a free. What's the issue?
he's been a great servant to the club over the years and especially in our promotion season which he was top class.
|
|
