|
Post by Olgrligm on Mar 15, 2008 20:18:23 GMT
Between 1 and 10. Hmm.
|
|
|
Post by MrMagic on Mar 15, 2008 20:21:18 GMT
I'm going to give him a 7
Was considering a lower mark, but...
He had the balls to try something different, and when he was interviewed on RStoke he seemed as bemused at the performance of the players as anyone else.
Would have been higher had he done something about our inability to keep hold of the ball and wear 10 men down sooner.
|
|
|
Post by pulismaskreplica on Mar 15, 2008 20:41:46 GMT
7. Agree with magic. Would have loved the win but at the end of the day we've picked up a good point.
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Mar 15, 2008 20:53:59 GMT
0!
Unnecessarily negative, ridiculous substitutions (Pugh for Dicko) and sending out the team with the sole intention of getting a 0-0 draw.
I just hope he isn't retreating into his shell again!
Be brave, and lets start playing like we are top of the league!
|
|
|
Post by fingers on Mar 15, 2008 20:55:58 GMT
6 not the best today against 10 men.davejonno absolutely fookin stupid score get real mate.
|
|
|
Post by boothenendboy on Mar 15, 2008 20:58:36 GMT
8,tried something different
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Mar 15, 2008 21:01:43 GMT
Simply my opinion Fingers, and I also know for a fact that we HADN'T worked on the formation that we started the game with.
Early this morning, we were 4-4-2 with Pugh at left back. God only knows what changed, but we got it wrong today.
A point we would all have taken at the start of the day, but a very very disappointing effort that was negative in the extreme.
If we do go up, imagine our line-up against the likes of Manure and Arsenal! That should be a real sight to behold.
Poor today mate, and a day saved primarily by results elsewhere!
|
|
|
Post by ruts66 on Mar 15, 2008 21:05:13 GMT
4.
5-4-1 against 10 not particularly good men...
|
|
|
Post by fingers on Mar 15, 2008 21:40:25 GMT
dave i agree it was poor but 0 as a score is just not right imho.
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on Mar 15, 2008 21:43:18 GMT
Wasn't there so I'm only going on commentary and just back reports. This is a hard one to rate, on the face of it we got a good point, we've gone top and Tone seemed to make some brave decisions. But, if Nash hadn't played out of his boots we wouldn't have got the point and it sounds like the selection and the substitutions just didn't really work. Anyway, a 6 from me at the end of that little essay
|
|
|
Post by ChesterStokie on Mar 15, 2008 22:54:45 GMT
0! Unnecessarily negative, ridiculous substitutions (Pugh for Dicko) and sending out the team with the sole intention of getting a 0-0 draw. I just hope he isn't retreating into his shell again! Be brave, and lets start playing like we are top of the league! Agree with the comments but 0 is a little harsh. I'll go for 2/10.
|
|
|
Post by york stokie on Mar 15, 2008 23:00:59 GMT
7. Was pleased with the changes that were made at half time. Although them going down to ten men probably had something to do with the changes, it doesnt always follow that Pulis makes them.
|
|
|
Post by garyhackett on Mar 15, 2008 23:03:17 GMT
I think tone thought that the only way of winning this was by the element of surprise with the team selection, unfortunately it didnt pay off with the performance however a point away at watford after a win at norwich is a good result.
6/10
|
|
|
Post by One-Two on Mar 15, 2008 23:09:40 GMT
good from pulis. started out out defensively (understandably) 2nd half switched to 4-4-2 Gally on for Cort was a good decision. team selection OK. 7.5/10
|
|