|
Post by mumf14 on May 27, 2010 23:09:29 GMT
Has he gone? Gayman... No, I've just nipped out for some Vaseline..
|
|
|
Post by supersmashinggreat on May 28, 2010 7:06:45 GMT
its not right or natural though is it
too many pc do gooders now a days.
|
|
|
Post by suttonstokie99 on May 28, 2010 7:16:49 GMT
I thought it was a really good programme even if 'chappers' is the worst presenter(if you can call him that) in the media behind Colin Murray(But not in a gay way). That rugby player must get all sorts of stick though with all the touching involved in rugby as opposed to football where the fans are harder than the players(once more not in a gay way) I would not be surprised if no footballer came out gay for at least another three years. I know this may sound like I'm just going on rumours but I'm pretty sure Sol Campbell is gay....he has the words camp and bell in his name ffs... Rereading what I just put I felt obliged to put not in a gay way ;D My Dad designed the place where Campbell lived, and people said that one of the reasons he left Notts County was because the gay scene in Nottingham was crap.
|
|
|
Post by greyman on May 28, 2010 7:58:09 GMT
its not right or natural though is it too many pc do gooders now a days. There have always been gay people and always will be. You might as well blame the colour of the sky on the do-gooders, it makes as much sense.
|
|
|
Post by sirpineapple89 on May 28, 2010 11:57:56 GMT
its not right or natural though is it too many pc do gooders now a days. How is it 'not natural' if much of it is due to genes? Fuck me, some of you live in the 70's. I couldn't give a shit if they're cavemen or raging homosexuals. It's human nature. Everyone's different. P.S I also know a girl who went out with Pique, although they may have been more of an 'item' if what I was told is correct.
|
|
|
Post by mermaidsal on May 28, 2010 11:58:05 GMT
mumf, you're officially warned for homophobia in this thread (and elsewhere to be fair). Live in 1937 Fegg Hayes with Les Dawson hanging out his washing on the line in your own head by all means but the world's moved on, opinions are welcome but not knee jerk abuse
|
|
|
Post by stokie12345 on May 28, 2010 12:11:06 GMT
its not right or natural though is it too many pc do gooders now a days. using the device you're looking at right now, you can comminucate with people from all over the world? Thats not fucking natural Sort yourself out you stupid homophobe
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on May 28, 2010 12:36:02 GMT
As every primate species from lemurs and bush babys to chimpanzees and orangutans have individuals which display homosexual behaviour, I'd be interested to know exactly what mumf and supersmashinggreat's definition of "natural" is. Presumably "natural" is what they agree with and unnatural is what they do not agree with?
|
|
|
Post by thepremierbanksy on May 28, 2010 14:58:46 GMT
its not right or natural though is it too many pc do gooders now a days. I tell you what there is too much of nowadays, people justifying their bigotted views on various matters by making out that those who disagree with them are do-gooders, tree-huggers, sandal wearing left wing hippies with some sort of anti-common sense agenda out to ruin the ways of the common man when in actual fact they are just deploying a bit of decency and respect for other human beings.
|
|
|
Post by stokelad84 on May 28, 2010 17:21:49 GMT
One photo doesn't prove that the pair are gay!
|
|
|
Post by Trouserdog on May 28, 2010 18:11:40 GMT
its not right or natural though is it too many pc do gooders now a days. I tell you what there is too much of nowadays, people justifying their bigotted views on various matters by making out that those who disagree with them are do-gooders, tree-huggers, sandal wearing left wing hippies with some sort of anti-common sense agenda out to ruin the ways of the common man when in actual fact they are just deploying a bit of decency and respect for other human beings. What he said.
|
|
|
Post by Northy on May 28, 2010 19:38:59 GMT
the question is - did the presenter (of fthe vidoe clip) and her sister go to his house, and where's the photo's to prove it
|
|
|
Post by st2potter on May 28, 2010 20:02:16 GMT
Mumf seems you're still bitter bout when that group of inmates "Caved your backdoor in" when you did that 2 month stretch for indecent exposure mucker
|
|
scfc64
Youth Player
1-0,2-1,3-2 or even 52%-48%..A win is a win
Posts: 474
|
Post by scfc64 on May 28, 2010 20:03:27 GMT
I live in blackpool and theirs millions of the bleeders here. Tell you something,if you find a quid on the pavement,kick it home! Fuck me,not the blackpool homecoming last monday,but the other weekend there was a gay parade on the prom,they come right past my shop dressed up like fairies,prancing around and acting like the rubbish victorian trannys on little britain,but they where for real. i should sort out a straight parade for normal people,but our council up here dont cater for the minoritys ! Anyway,live and let live,thats my motto,i'm off to shave my legs and watch a re-run of supermarket sweep!
|
|
|
Post by swampmongrel on May 28, 2010 22:28:12 GMT
I tell you what there is too much of nowadays, people justifying their bigotted views on various matters by making out that those who disagree with them are do-gooders, tree-huggers, sandal wearing left wing hippies with some sort of anti-common sense agenda out to ruin the ways of the common man when in actual fact th ey are just deploying a bit of decency and respect for other human beings.What he said. What he said in bold.
|
|
|
Post by Northy on May 29, 2010 6:07:47 GMT
its not right or natural though is it too many pc do gooders now a days. How is it 'not natural' if much of it is due to genes? Fuck me, some of you live in the 70's. I couldn't give a shit if they're cavemen or raging homosexuals. It's human nature. Everyone's different. P.S I also know a girl who went out with Pique, although they may have been more of an 'item' if what I was told is correct. Natural, how is it natural? Male and female together are natural, male and male or female and female, or man and goat is un-natural. You say it's the gene's which make it natural? well it's defective genes which has made it happen, therefore it's not natural it's a defect of nature which is un-natural. The penis is meant to go in the vagina, the bowels are meant for storing waste from the body, how is it natural to put a penis in the bowels? Therefore It's defective nature, in the animal kingdon a defect would easily be spotted and that line of genes dies out.
|
|
|
Post by Stoke-on-Toronto on May 29, 2010 6:18:21 GMT
I always found it curious that certain people, such as northwichstokie, care so much about us homosexuals and try so bloody hard to convince people it's wrong, unnatural, or a defect. He plucks something like saying "it's a defect" out of thin air and basis his entire rant about it.
Does your penis belong in a woman's mouth? Well, no... that seems rather unnatural... but do I get on your case for putting it there? No. I don't care.
|
|
|
Post by Northy on May 29, 2010 6:28:41 GMT
I always found it curious that certain people, such as northwichstokie, care so much about us homosexuals and try so bloody hard to convince people it's wrong, unnatural, or a defect. He plucks something like saying "it's a defect" out of thin air and basis his entire rant about it. Does your penis belong in a woman's mouth? Well, no... that seems rather unnatural... but do I get on your case for putting it there? No. I don't care. I don't care about you very much, and I'm not trying bloody hard, and I haven't 'plucked it out of thin air' I'm just answering in a scientific way to somebody that had another side of the discussion saying that it is natural. I have no problems with homosexuals, I work with a couple, but my point was that it is defective genes that cause the effect, we all have defective genes, cancer, dementia, maybe etc
|
|
|
Post by ColonelMustard on May 29, 2010 6:28:42 GMT
Northwich, I guess it's more natural to rape a woman than have consenting sex with a man? In nature the genetic line of the rapist goes far and wide. In fact if he kills the offspring of his rivals his genes stand more chance too. Happens in nature all the time. It's natural. Don't let genetics write your moral code.
|
|
|
Post by Stoke-on-Toronto on May 29, 2010 6:32:57 GMT
I don't care about you very much, and I'm not trying bloody hard, and I haven't 'plucked it out of thin air' I'm just answering in a scientific way to somebody that had another side of the discussion saying that it is natural. I have no problems with homosexuals, I work with a couple, but my point was that it is defective genes that cause the effect, we all have defective genes, cancer, dementia, maybe etc Okay fair enough... but can we do this for fun? Please, tell me what you think of this The penis is meant to go in the vagina, the bowels are meant for storing waste from the body, how is it natural to put a penis in the bowels? Therefore It's defective nature, in the animal kingdon a defect would easily be spotted and that line of genes dies out. Thank you, Stokie. You've won me over and now I'm going to use your logic. (I'm assuming you are male, if not you can easily grasp what I'm would be saying if you were female) Does the penis belong in a woman's mouth? Well, no... that seems rather "unnatural" by your definition. The mouth is for consuming food and water. How is it natural to put a penis there? Therefor it's defective nature. You are a defect of nature.
|
|
|
Post by Northy on May 29, 2010 6:33:17 GMT
too late with your edit and as for putting penis in a woman's mouth, I've been marreid for nearly 25 years My genes help the human race to carry on naturally, if every human had homosexual genes, we wouldn't be here now discussing it
|
|
|
Post by Stoke-on-Toronto on May 29, 2010 6:35:35 GMT
too late with your edit and as for putting penis in a woman's mouth, I've been marreid for nearly 25 years My genes help the human race to carry on naturally, if every human had homosexual genes, we wouldn't be here now discussing it Late edit or not, is putting a penis in a womans mouth, putting a vagina in a mans mouth defective by nature? or is it different? Do you realize how offensive it is to proclaim without any real evidence that a whole group of people are defects of nature?
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on May 29, 2010 6:36:07 GMT
How is it 'not natural' if much of it is due to genes? Fuck me, some of you live in the 70's. I couldn't give a shit if they're cavemen or raging homosexuals. It's human nature. Everyone's different. P.S I also know a girl who went out with Pique, although they may have been more of an 'item' if what I was told is correct. Natural, how is it natural? Male and female together are natural, male and male or female and female, or man and goat is un-natural. You say it's the gene's which make it natural? well it's defective genes which has made it happen, therefore it's not natural it's a defect of nature which is un-natural. The penis is meant to go in the vagina, the bowels are meant for storing waste from the body, how is it natural to put a penis in the bowels? Therefore It's defective nature, in the animal kingdon a defect would easily be spotted and that line of genes dies out. "that line of genes dies out" - Northwich, that is the biggest load of crap I have heard. If it were true then how is it that all primate species have individuals who exhibit homosexual behaviour? I doubt if there is a gene for homosexuality - although there could be a random combination of genes which predisposes someone to be homosexual. However, it is never going to "die out" as you put it, because it will continue to crop up like clockwork in every generation. Always has and always will. What would be unnatural would be if it suddenly stopped happening. Scientists would be tearing their hair out to find out why a natural phenomenon which has been with us since we became Homo Sapiens had suddenly "switched itself off".
|
|
|
Post by Northy on May 29, 2010 6:37:04 GMT
Northwich, I guess it's more natural to rape a woman than have consenting sex with a man? In nature the genetic line of the rapist goes far and wide. In fact if he kills the offspring of his rivals his genes stand more chance too. Happens in nature all the time. It's natural. Don't let genetics write your moral code. tell me how many species in the animal world use rape to carry on the species? most species have an elaborate courtship with the male working hard to impress a female
|
|
|
Post by Stoke-on-Toronto on May 29, 2010 6:39:05 GMT
I do apologise for the late edit, northwichstokie. But you must understand, when somebody says such baseless things without any evidence, and seems to have no logic at all, a million counter arguments spring to mind and I like to use as many as i can when dealing with bigots.
|
|
|
Post by Northy on May 29, 2010 6:40:35 GMT
Natural, how is it natural? Male and female together are natural, male and male or female and female, or man and goat is un-natural. You say it's the gene's which make it natural? well it's defective genes which has made it happen, therefore it's not natural it's a defect of nature which is un-natural. The penis is meant to go in the vagina, the bowels are meant for storing waste from the body, how is it natural to put a penis in the bowels? Therefore It's defective nature, in the animal kingdon a defect would easily be spotted and that line of genes dies out. "that line of genes dies out" - Northwich, that is the biggest load of crap I have heard. If it were true then how is it that all primate species have individuals who exhibit homosexual behaviour? I doubt if there is a gene for homosexuality - although there could be a random combination of genes which predisposes someone to be homosexual. However, it is never going to "die out" as you put it, because it will continue to crop up like clockwork in every generation. Always has and always will. What would be unnatural would be if it suddenly stopped happening. Scientists would be tearing their hair out to find out why a natural phenomenon which has been with us since we became Homo Sapiens had suddenly "switched itself off". bit like most of your arse licking posts then forny If a homosexual animal in the animal kingdom does not mate then how is it going to reproduce? That line of genes dies out, it's bleeding obvious, try watching your squirrels for a while
|
|
|
Post by Northy on May 29, 2010 6:41:26 GMT
I do apologise for the late edit, northwichstokie. But you must understand, when somebody says such baseless things without any evidence, and seems to have no logic at all, a million counter arguments spring to mind and I like to use as many as i can when dealing with bigots. so you're calling me a bigot?
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on May 29, 2010 6:42:05 GMT
Northwich, I guess it's more natural to rape a woman than have consenting sex with a man? In nature the genetic line of the rapist goes far and wide. In fact if he kills the offspring of his rivals his genes stand more chance too. Happens in nature all the time. It's natural. Don't let genetics write your moral code. tell me how many species in the animal world use rape to carry on the species? most species have an elaborate courtship with the male working hard to impress a female Certainly Chimps and Orangutans have rapists in their species. Don't know how many other species do. Chimps also have murderers as well. Possibly they don't realise it isn't natural - if only they could benefit from reading Northwich's thoughts on this message board - they might learn summat! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Stoke-on-Toronto on May 29, 2010 6:43:33 GMT
I do apologise for the late edit, northwichstokie. But you must understand, when somebody says such baseless things without any evidence, and seems to have no logic at all, a million counter arguments spring to mind and I like to use as many as i can when dealing with bigots. so you're calling me a bigot? If you call an entire group of people defects of nature without any scientific proof, then yes. I am. Please, enlighten me.
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on May 29, 2010 6:43:47 GMT
It's pointless when people condemn or justify human behaviour by comparing with animals. Are we wrong not to chew the cud? Am I unnatural to be going baldy because monkeys don't?
|
|