|
|
Post by scfc2010 on May 25, 2010 15:44:32 GMT
Me too, ish, ..Carragher would go instead of Dawson though...... Who would play right back if Johnson got injured? you see this is where Shawcross would solve all the problems  |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 25, 2010 15:45:18 GMT
Who would play right back if Johnson got injured? you see this is where Shawcross would solve all the problems Playing at right back? He's a crap right back. |
|
|
|
Post by effloresce on May 25, 2010 20:09:00 GMT
As long as Heskey is out and Adam Johnson is in then I'll be happy. Johnson could seriously rip some defenders to shreds, maybe even have an affect like Rooney in Euro 2004 (But not as good as Rooney's ofc).
|
|
|
|
Post by french toast on May 25, 2010 20:17:20 GMT
you see this is where Shawcross would solve all the problems Playing at right back? He's a crap right back. this. carra has to go, |
|
|
|
Post by gaznandi on May 25, 2010 20:33:18 GMT
Me too, ish, ..Carragher would go instead of Dawson though...... Who would play right back if Johnson got injured? I'd have had, urgh, Gary Neville there instead... |
|
|
|
Post by jimmygscfc on May 26, 2010 9:03:01 GMT
Huddlestone must have touched the ball twice the other night and looks too ponderous for international football. And there's no way on God;s earth Capello will take Lennion, Walcotta and SWP. Johnson could possibly be the wildcard as he's a left winger who can also play on the right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bick on May 26, 2010 10:07:15 GMT
green, james, hart
johnson, king, terry, cole, warnock, dawson, carragher
gerrard, milner, lampard, barry, lennon, walcott, cole, parker, johnson
rooney, crouch, Heskey, defoe
|
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on May 29, 2010 15:00:15 GMT
What happens if Bent notches a hat-trick tomorrow?
I bet Heskey and Defoe are concerned
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 29, 2010 15:03:35 GMT
The worry for me is the lack of Joe Cole tomorrow. I don't think Capello will take him.  And fuck wit Walcott will go instead. |
|
|
|
Post by magicmanfuller on May 29, 2010 15:08:10 GMT
green, james, hart johnson, king, terry, cole, warnock, dawson, carragher gerrard, milner, lampard, barry, lennon, walcott, cole, parker, johnson rooney, crouch, Heskey, defoe you would leave out the captain then?? and pick carragher/dawson instead - madness |
|
|
|
Post by magicmanfuller on May 29, 2010 15:09:20 GMT
The worry for me is the lack of Joe Cole tomorrow. I don't think Capello will take him. And fuck wit Walcott will go instead. You mean theo walcott who scored a hatrick in the key game in croatia? What has joe cole done exactly in the last two years? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2010 15:11:32 GMT
The worry for me is the lack of Joe Cole tomorrow. I don't think Capello will take him. And fuck wit Walcott will go instead. You mean theo walcott who scored a hatrick in the key game in croatia? What has joe cole done exactly in the last two years? Joe Cole's done a fuckload more for club and country than Walcott has over the last four years. Other than the Croatia hat trick, what the fuck has Walcott done? He's all pace and nothing else. Brainless footballer who has no idea when to release the ball or vision to pick a pass. There are at least three better options for the right hand side than him, arguably 4-5. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 29, 2010 15:14:40 GMT
Ahhh one game 18 months ago. Joe Cole is the better player and as such should go, he offers something we don't have much of and that is technical ability. Walcott has no end product bar one hat-trick that he is living off. Walcott should not go to the World Cup. Milner, Lennon, Johnson and Cole are all better and all should go and offer more than waster. Great potential but he needs to fulfil it and he hasn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on May 29, 2010 15:18:08 GMT
I can see the logic of Walcott as a specific bench option, late in the game against tiring opponents, but I think everyone's baffled why Capello seems to see him as an option to start.
The selection of Bent tomorrow is intriguing though. He must be seriously considering him as an option, at the expense of Heskey/Defoe.
|
|
|
|
Post by magicmanfuller on May 29, 2010 15:19:03 GMT
You mean theo walcott who scored a hatrick in the key game in croatia? What has joe cole done exactly in the last two years? Joe Cole's done a fuckload more for club and country than Walcott has over the last four years. Other than the Croatia hat trick, what the fuck has Walcott done? He's all pace and nothing else. Brainless footballer who has no idea when to release the ball or vision to pick a pass. There are at least three better options for the right hand side than him, arguably 4-5. Its the last 1/2 years that count though isnt it. 4 years ago darius vassell was an england regular, does that mean he should go. Walcott hasnt been fit all season bar the last few games, and it is obvious that now he has got afew games under his belt he is good enough to go and he has proven he can do it at this level in the qualifiers. Joe Cole hasnt done that even at club level THIS SEASON |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 29, 2010 15:20:06 GMT
Walcott has done fuck THIS SEASON. He couldn't even beat Danny Collins at our place!  |
|
|
|
Post by magicmanfuller on May 29, 2010 15:20:21 GMT
I can see the logic of Walcott as a specific bench option, late in the game against tiring opponents, but I think everyone's baffled why Capello seems to see him as an option to start. The selection of Bent tomorrow is intriguing though. He must be seriously considering him as an option, at the expense of Heskey/Defoe. If Bent goes in place of Defoe that would be a joke |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 29, 2010 15:21:06 GMT
I can see the logic of Walcott as a specific bench option, late in the game against tiring opponents, but I think everyone's baffled why Capello seems to see him as an option to start. The selection of Bent tomorrow is intriguing though. He must be seriously considering him as an option, at the expense of Heskey/Defoe. Why? Defoe is pretty avarage in an England shirt imo. If Bent goes in place of Defoe that would be a joke |
|
|
|
Post by magicmanfuller on May 29, 2010 15:21:09 GMT
Walcott has done fuck THIS SEASON. He couldn't even beat Danny Collins at our place! So you dont think in the last few league games of the season walcott was playing well for arsenal? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2010 15:22:12 GMT
I can see the logic of Walcott as a specific bench option, late in the game against tiring opponents, but I think everyone's baffled why Capello seems to see him as an option to start. The selection of Bent tomorrow is intriguing though. He must be seriously considering him as an option, at the expense of Heskey/Defoe. If Bent goes in place of Defoe that would be a joke Why exactly? Bent has scored goals wherever he's been and has the better scoring record out of the two. What is a joke is Bent's lack of international opportunities over the last few years despite being a consistent goalscorer. |
|
|
|
Post by magicmanfuller on May 29, 2010 15:22:44 GMT
Why? Defoe is pretty avarage in an England shirt imo. If Bent goes in place of Defoe that would be a joke Defoe is having a bad run, is doesnt discount the fact that he is a proven goalscorer at all levels, unlike bent who has never done a thing for england when given the chance and hes had afew |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 29, 2010 15:22:42 GMT
Walcott has done fuck THIS SEASON. He couldn't even beat Danny Collins at our place! So you dont think in the last few league games of the season walcott was playing well for arsenal? No. He has had a shocking season. The 4 I listed above all have the end product and 2 can offer the pace of Walcott too. I don't see the need for him. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2010 15:23:27 GMT
Walcott has done fuck THIS SEASON. He couldn't even beat Danny Collins at our place! So you dont think in the last few league games of the season walcott was playing well for arsenal? I think there are 4-5 far better options. |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 29, 2010 15:23:41 GMT
Defoe is having a bad run, is doesnt discount the fact that he is a proven goalscorer at all levels, unlike bent who has never done a thing for england when given the chance and hes had afew Defoe will go, don't worry.  |
|
|
|
Post by magicmanfuller on May 29, 2010 15:24:01 GMT
So you dont think in the last few league games of the season walcott was playing well for arsenal? No. He has had a shocking season. The 4 I listed above all have the end product and 2 can offer the pace of Walcott too. I don't see the need for him. So you dont think 3 goals i croatia for your national team in the key match of the qualifying group equals end product |
|
|
|
Post by magicmanfuller on May 29, 2010 15:24:54 GMT
So you dont think in the last few league games of the season walcott was playing well for arsenal? I think there are 4-5 far better options. Milner wouldn be the only one for me. Lennon and Theo are at a similar level |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 29, 2010 15:26:00 GMT
No. He has had a shocking season. The 4 I listed above all have the end product and 2 can offer the pace of Walcott too. I don't see the need for him. So you dont think 3 goals i croatia for your national team in the key match of the qualifying group equals end product It was ONE game. What else has he done? He runs into cul-de-sacs and doesn't deliver a final ball to score from. Mama scored 2 in a match once, doesn't make him a sublime goalscorer does it? If he was consistent with it then I'd agree but he isn't. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2010 15:26:04 GMT
I think there are 4-5 far better options. Milner wouldn be the only one for me. Lennon and Theo are at a similar level Lennon is twice the player. Has far more influence on games, has improved his final ball this season and is a constant menace - more intelligent footballer than Walcott. |
|
|
|
Post by magicmanfuller on May 29, 2010 15:27:01 GMT
If Bent goes in place of Defoe that would be a joke Why exactly? Bent has scored goals wherever he's been and has the better scoring record out of the two. What is a joke is Bent's lack of international opportunities over the last few years despite being a consistent goalscorer. thats because it is clear he isnt an international quality player. Yes he can score goals at club level, and as a result deserves his chance. why hasnt he had that? because he offers nothing else then the goals, which we both know would be alot harder to come by at international level |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2010 15:27:57 GMT
Defoe is having a bad run, is doesnt discount the fact that he is a proven goalscorer at all levels, unlike bent who has never done a thing for england when given the chance and hes had afew Bent has started two games for England. Tomorrow is his sixth cap. If he'd had the opportunities Defoe has had he'd have done similarly as well imo. The vast majority of Defoe's goals have come against the likes of Andorra. |
|
And fuck wit Walcott will go instead.
